A model 2DLEAF of leaf gas exchange: Development, validation, and ecological application

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 93, Issue 1-3, 1996, Pages 1-18

  Pachepsky, L B ^a,b   Acock, B ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Model building; Photosynthesis; Transpiration; Validation

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 0030590828     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3800(95)00207-3     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Institute of Physics Handbook, Vol. 1. 1972. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 250 pp.
2. 2 world. Plant Cell Environ., 14: 13-20.
3. Ball, J.T., Woodrow, I.E. and Berry, J.A., 1987. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: J. Biggens (Editor), Progress in Photosynthesis Research, Vol. IV. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 221-224.
4. 2 levels. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 21: 167-196.
5. Brezhnev, D.D., 1958. Tomato. In: P.M. Zhukovsky (Editor), Flora of Cultivated Plants, Vol. XX. Vegetable Plants Family Solanaceae (tomato, common eggplant, black hightshade, pepino, pepper, hush tomato, mandrake). State Agricultural Publishing Office, Moscow, pp. 1-307 (in Russian).
6. 3 species. Planta, 149: 78-90.
7. 2. J. Exp. Bot., 41: 785-795.
8. Hahn, B.D., 1987. A mathematical model of photorespiration and photosynthesis. Ann. Bot., 60: 157-169.
9. Hanson, H.C., 1917. Leaf structure as related to environment. Am. J. Bot., 4: 533-560.
10. 3 leaves to environmental factors. In: K.J. Boote and R.S. Loomis (Editors), Modeling Crop Photosynthesis - from Biochemistry to Canopy. CSSA Special Publication Number 19. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 17-39.
11. 2. Plant Cell Environ., 15: 271-282.
12. Istok, J., 1989. Groundwater Modeling by the Finite Element Method. Water Resource Monograph 13. Am. Geophys. Union, Washington, DC, 495 pp.
13. Jones, H.G., 1992. Plants and Microclimate. A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 428 pp.
14. Kaitala, V., Hari, P., Vapaavuori, E. and Salminen, R., 1982. A dynamic model for photosynthesis. Ann. Bot., 50: 385-396.
15. 2 stimulation of growth and yield under environmental restraints. In: H.Z. Enoch and B.A. Kimball (Editors), Carbon Dioxide Enrichment of Greenhouse Crops. Vol II. Physiology, Yield, and Economics. CSC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 53-67.
16. 2 alter stomatal density? Flora, 181: 253-257.
17. Laisk, A., 1993. Mathematical modelling of free-pool and channeled electron transport in photosynthesis: evidence for a functional supercomplex around photosystem I. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 251: 243-251.
18. 2 enrichment on internal leaf surface area in soybeans. Bot. Gaz., 148: 137-140.
19. Leuning, R., 1983. Transport of gases into leaves. Plant Cell Environ., 6: 181-194.
20. Lewis, M.C., 1972. The physiological significance of variation in leaf structure. Sci. Prog. (London), 60: 25-51.
21. Ludwig, L.G. and Withers, A.C., 1978. Effect of temperature on single leaf photosynthesis and respiration in tomato. In: 1977 Report of the Glasshouse Crops Research Institute. Littlehampton, UK. pp. 51-52.
22. 2-concentration on the morphological, histological, and cytological changes in tomato plants. Acta Agric. Scand., 23: 241-246.
23. Miroslavov, E.A., 1974. Structure and Function of the Leaf Epidermis of Angiosperm Plants. Nauka, Leningrad, 301 pp. (in Russian).
24. Moskaleva, G.I. and Sinel'nikova, V.N., 1977. Characteristics of the anatomical structure of tomato leaf as affected by cultivation under conditions of salinization. Bull. Vses, Inst. Rast., 74: 6-11 (in Russian).
25. Nobel, P.S., 1991. Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology. Acad. Press, San Diego, 635 pp.
26. 2 concentration increases stomate numbers in Phaseolus uulgaris leaves. Bot. Gaz., 142: 438-441.
27. Pachepsky, L.B., Haskett, J.D. and Acock, B., 1995. A two-dimensional model of leaf gas exchange with special reference to leaf anatomy. J. Biogeogr., 22: 209-214.
28. Pachepsky, L.B., Haskett, J.D. and Acock, B., 1996. An adequate model of photosynthesis. 1. Parameterization, validation, and comparison of models. Agric. Syst., 50: 209-225.
29. 2 and other gases inside leaves. Tansley Review No. 65. New Phytol., 120: 449-479.
30. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. and Wetterling, W.T., 1986. Numerical Recipes. The Art of Scientific Programming. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 818 pp.
31. Rogers, H.H., Bingham, G.E., Cure, J.D., Heck, W.W., Heagle, A.S., Israel, D.W., Smith, J.M., Surano, K.A. and Thomas, J.F., 1980. Field studies of plant responses to elevated carbon dioxide levels. DOE Report 001 in Series Response of Vegetation to Carbon Dioxide. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 113 pp.
32. Salisbury, F.B. and Ross, C.W., 1991. Plant Physiology, 4th edition. Wadsworth, Belmont, 682 pp.
33. 2. Photosynthetica, 29: 487-497.
34. Tallman, G., 1992. The chemosmotic model of stomatal opening revisited. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 11: 35-57.
35. Ticha, I., 1982. Photosynthetic characteristics during ontogenesis of leaves. 7. Stomata density and sizes. Photosynthetica, 16: 375-471.
36. Van Volkenburgh, E. and Davies, W.J., 1977. Leaf anatomy and water relations of plant grown in controlled environments and in the field. Crop Sci., 17: 353-359.
37. 2 from pre-industrial levels. Nature, 327: 617-618.
38. Zeiger, E., 1983. The biology of stomatal guard cells. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 34: 441-475.