Borel equivalence relations and classifications of countable models

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 221-272

  Hjorth, Greg ^a,b   Kechris, Alexander S ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030589733     PISSN: 01680072     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-0072(96)00006-1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. [1] S. Adams, Trees and amenable equivalence relations, Ergodic Theory Dynamical Systems 10 (1990) 1-14.
2. [2] S. Adams and R. Lyons, Amenability, Kazhdan's property and percolation for trees, groups and equivalence relations, Israel J. Math. 75 (1991) 341-370.
3. [3] S. Adams and R. Spatzier, Kazhdan groups, cocycles and trees, Amer. J. Math. 112 (1990) 271-287.
4. [4] C. Akemann and M. Walter, Unbounded negative definite functions, Canad. J. Math. 33 (4) (1981) 862-871.
5. [5] J. Barwise, Admissible Sets and Structures (Springer. New York, 1975).
6. [6] H. Becker and A.S. Kechris, The descriptive set theory of Polish group actions, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series, Cambridge Univ. Press, to appear.
7. [7] C. Berg, J.P.R. Christensen, and P. Ressel, Harmonic Analysis on Semigroups, Grad. Texts in Math. (Springer, New York, 1984).
8. [8] P. de la Harpe and A. Valette, La propriété (T) de Kazhdan pour les groups localement compacts, Asterisque, Soc. Math, de France 175 (1989).
9. [9] R. Dougherty, S. Jackson and A.S. Kechris, The structure of hyperfinite Borel equivalence relations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 34 (1) (1994) 193-225.
10. [10] E. Effros, Transformation groups and C*-algebras, Ann. of Math. 81 (1) (1965) 38-55.
11. [11] J. Feldman and C.C. Moore, Ergodic equivalence relations, cohomology and von Neumann algebras, I. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 234 (2) (1977) 289-324.
12. [12] H. Friedman and L. Stanley, A Borel reducibility theory for classes of countable structures, J. Symbolic Logic 54 (1989) 894-914.
13. [13] L. Fuchs, Infinite Abelian Groups (Academic Press, New York, 1970).
14. [14] L. Harrington, A.S. Kechris and A. Louveau, A Glimm-Effros dichotomy for Borel equivalence relations, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (4) (1990) 903-928.
15. [15] G. Hjorth and A.S. Kechris, Analytic equivalence relations and Ulm-type classifications, J. Symbolic Logic 60 (1995) 1273-1300.
16. [16] S. Jackson, A.S. Kechris, and A. Louveau, Countable Borel equivalence relations, in preparation.
17. [17] A.S. Kechris, Amenable equivalence relations and Turing degrees, J. Symbolic Logic 56 (1991) 182-194.
18. [18] A.S. Kechris, Countable sections for locally compact group actions, Ergodic. Theory Dynamical Systems. 12 (1992) 283-295.
19. [19] A.S. Kechris, The structure of Borel equivalence relations, in: H. Judah, W. Just and H. Woodin, eds., Set theory of the Continuum, MSRI Publications, 26 (Springer, New York, 1992) 89-102.
20. [20] A.S. Kechris, Classical Descriptive Set Theory (Springer, New York, 1995).
21. [21] A.S. Kechris, Notes on definable group actions and equivalence relations, preprint.
22. [22] H.J. Keisler, Model Theory for Infinitary Logic (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1971).
23. [23] A. Louveau, Ensembles analytiques et boréliens dans les espaces produits, Asterisque, 78, Soc. Math. de France (1980).
24. [24] A. Louveau. On the reducibility order between Borel equivalence relations, preprint.
25. [25] W. Magnus, A. Karrass, and D. Solitar, Combinatorial Group Theory (Wiley, New York, 1966).
26. [26] A. Mekler, Stability of nilpotent groups of class 2 and prime exponent, J. Symbolic Logic 46 (1981) 781-788.
27. [27] G. Melles, One cannot show from ZFC that there is an Ulm-type classification of the countable torsionfree abelian groups, in: H. Judah, W. Just and H. Woodin, eds., Set Theory of the Continuum, MSRI Publications, 26 (Springer, New York, 1992).
28. [28] A.W. Miller, On the Borel classification of the isomorphism class of a countable model, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 24 (1) (1983) 22-34.
29. 0α separation principle, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 242 (1978) 185-204.
30. [30] Y.N. Moschovakis, Descriptive Set Theory (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1980).
31. [31] M. Nadel, Scott sentences and admissible sets, Ann. Math. Logic 7 (1974) 267-294.
32. [32] R.L. Sami, Polish group actions and the Vaught conjecture, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 341 (1994) 335-353.
33. [33] D. Sullivan, B. Weiss, and J.D.M. Wright, Generic dynamics and monotone complete C*-algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 295 (2) (1986) 795-809.
34. [34] Y. Suzuki, Orbits of denumerable models of complete theories, Fund. Math. 67 (1970) 89-95.
35. [35] R. Zimmer, Ergodic Theory and Semisimple Groups (Birkhauser, Boston, 1984).