Effects of transferred ova per recipient and dual use of donors as recipients on production of transgenic swine

Theriogenology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 201-209

  Pursel, V G ^a   Wall, R J ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Donor; Embryo transfer; Recipient; Swine; Transgenic

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BREEDING; EMBRYO INDUCTION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ESTRUS CYCLE; FEMALE; LITTER SIZE; MICROINJECTION; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; OOCYTE DONATION; OVULATION INDUCTION; SWINE; TRANSGENIC ANIMAL;

ANIMALIA; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0030585782     PISSN: 0093691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691X(96)00178-1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 1. Baker RD, Shaw GA, Dodds JS. Control of estrus and litter size in gilts with Aimax (I.C.I. 33,828) and pregnant mare's serum. Can J Anim Sci 1970;50-25-29.
2. 2. Bazer FW, Robison OW, Clawson AJ, Ulberg LC. Uterine capacity at two stages of gestation in gilts following embryo superinduction. J Anim Sci 1969;29:30-34.
3. 3. Brem G, Brenig B, Goodman HM, Selden RC, Graf F, Kruff B, Springman K, Hondele J, Meyer J, Winnaker E-L, Krausslich H. Production of transgenic mice, rabbits and pigs by microinjection into pronuclei. Zuchthygiene 1985;20:251-252
4. 4. Brem G, Springmann K, Meier, E., Krausslich H, Brenig B, Muller M, Winnaker E-L. Factors in the success of transgenic pig programs. In: Church RB (ed), Transgenic Models in Medicine and Agriculture. New York. Wiley-Liss, 1989;116:61-72.
5. 5. Christenson RK, Leymaster KA, Young LD. Justification of unilateral hysterectomy-ovariectomy as a model to evaluate uterine capacity in swine. J Anim Sci 1987;65:738-744.
6. 6. Christenson RK, Pope CE, Zimmerman-Pope VA, Day BN. Synchronization of estrus and ovulation in superovulated gilts. J Anim Sci 1973;36:914-918.
7. 7. Cunningham PJ, England ME, Young LD, Zimmerman DR. Selection for ovulation rate in swine: correlated response in litter size and weight. J Anim Sci 1979;48:509-516.
8. 8. Dziuk PJ, Effect of number of embryos and uterine space on embryo survival in the pig. J Anim Sci 1968;27:673-676.
9. 9. Ebert KM, Schindler JES. Transgenic farm animals: progress report. Theriogenology 1993;39:121-136.
10. 10. Fenton FR, Bazer FW, Robison, OW, Ulberg LC. Superinduction of gilts with 7-day pig embryos. J Anim Sci 1969;27:144 abstr.
11. 11. French AJ, Zviedrans P, Ashman RJ, Heap PA, Seamark RF. Comparison of prepubertal and postpubertal young sows as a source of one-cell embryos for microinjection. Theriogenology 1991;35:202 abstr.
12. 12. Hajdu MA, Krisher RL, Knight JW, Canseco RS, Velander WH, Pearson RE, Gwazdauskas FC. Effect of culture conditions, donor age, and injection site on in vitro development of DNA micrinjected porcine zygotes. J Anim Sci 1994;72:1299-1305.
13. 13. Hammer RE, Pursel VG, Rexroad CE, Jr, Wall RJ, Bolt DJ, Ebert KM, Palmiter RD Brinster RL. Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection. Nature 1985;315:680-683.
14. 14. Hammer RE, Pursel VG, Rexroad CE, Jr, Wall RJ, Bolt DJ, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL. Genetic engineering of mammalian embryos. J anim sci 1986;63:269-278.
15. 15. Hunter RHF, The effect of superovulation on fertilization and embryonic survival in the pig. Anim Prod 1966;8:457-465.
16. 16. Johnson, RK, Zimmerman DR, Kittok, RJ. Selection for components of reproduction in swine. Livestock Prod Sci 1984;11:541-557.
17. 17. Lamberson WR, Day BN. Response to selection for increased superovulation rate in swine. Proc 3rd World Congr of Genet Applied to Livestock Prod 1986;XI:249-253.
18. 18. Longenecker DE, Day BN. Fertility level of sows superovulated at post-weaning estrus. J Anim Sci 1968;27:709-711.
19. 19. Martin MJ, Houtz J, Adams C, Thomas D, Freeman B, Keirns J, Cottrill F. Effect of pronuclear DNA microinjection on in vivo development of porcine ova. Beltsville Symposium XX, Biotechnology's Role in the Genetic Improvement of Farm Animals, Beltsville MD 1995;P38 abstr.
20. 20. Pinkert CA, Koouman DL, Baumgartner A, Keisler, DH. In vitro development of zygotes from superovulated prepuberal and mature gilts. J Reprod Fertil 1989; 87:63-66.
21. 21. Polge C, Day BN, Groves TW. Synchronization of ovulation and artificial insemination in pigs. Vet Rec 1968;83:136-141.
22. 22. Pope CE, Christenson R K, Zimmerman-Pope VA, Day BN Effect of number of embryos on embryonic survival in recipient gilts. J Anim Sci 1972;35:805-808.
23. 23. Pursel VG, Rexroad CE, Jr. Status of research with transgenic farm animals. J Anim Sci 1993;71(Suppl. 3):10-19.
24. 24. Pursel VG, Wall RJ. Use of donor gilts as recipients of microinjected ova. J Anim Sci 1991;67 (Suppl 1):375 abstr.
25. 25. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6, SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC 1985.
26. 26. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1980;233-236.
27. 27. Vincent CK, Robison OW, Ulberg LC. A technique for reciprocal embryo transfer in swine. J Anim Sci 1964;23:1084-1088.
28. 28. Wall RJ, Pursel VG, Hammer RE, Brinster RL. Development of porcine ova that were centrifuged to permit visualization of pronuclei and nuclei. Biol Reprod 1985;32:645-651.
29. 29. Wei Q, Fan J, Chen D. Effect of number of transferred microinjected embryos on pregnancy rate and litter size of pigs. Theriogenology 1993;39:338 abstr.
30. 30. Williams BL, Sparkes AET, Krisher RL, Canseco RS, Knight JW, Johnson WH, Velander WH, Page RL, Drohan WN, Young JM, Pearson RE, Wilkins TD, Gwazdauskas FC. In vitro development of zygotes from prepubertal gilts after microinjection of DNA. J Anim Sci 1992;70:2207-2211.