Medical publishing - Dissemination of knowledge or personal promotion?;Medisinsk publisering - Kunnskapsformidling eller personlig promovering?

Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening

Volumn 116, Issue 30, 1996, Pages 3652-3655

  Nylenna, Magne ^a  

^a Tidsskrift Den Norske Laegeforening   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; REVIEW;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH;

EID: 0030579390     PISSN: 00292001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskab. Ein kort presentasjon. Trondheim: Tapir. 1992.
2. Larsen Ø. Lindskog BI. Sundhetstidende 1778-1781. Johann Clemens Tode. Oslo: Seksjon for medisinsk historie, Universitetet i Oslo, 1991.
3. Lock S. As things really were? I: Lock S. red. The future of medical journals. London: British Medical Journal, 1991.
4. Fye WB. Medical authorship: traditions, trends, and tribulations. Ann Intern Med 1990: 113: 317-25.
5. Benson KR. Science and the single author: historical reflections on the problem of authorship. Cancer Bull 1991; 43: 324-31.
6. Sobal J, Ferentz KS, Abstract creep and author inflation. N Engl J Med 1990; 323: 488-9.
7. Strub RL, Black FW. Multiple authorship. Lancet 1976; 2: 1090-1.
8. Drenth JPH. Authorship inflation: a trend reversed. Lancet 1995; 345: 1242-3.
9. Richards RK. Physicians' self-directed learning. A new perspective for continuing medical education. I. Reading. Möbius 1986; 6, nr. 2: 1-13.
10. Stinson ER, Mueller DA. Survey of health professionals' information habits and needs. JAMA 1980; 243: 140-3.
11. Nylenna M, Aasland OG, Falkum E. Keeping professionally updated: perceived coping and CME-profiles among physicians. The Journal of Continuing Education in Health Professions 1996; under trykking.
12. Nylenna M. Scientific literature and the shaping of a medical profession in Norway. I: Larsen Ø, red. The shaping of a profession. Oslo: Den norske lægeforening, 1996; under trykking.
13. Gross PKL, Gross EM. College libraries and chemical education. Science 1927; 66: 385-9.
14. Garfield E. Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 1955; 122: 108-11.
15. Seglen P. Bruk av siteringsanalyser og andre bibliometriske metoder i evaluering av forskningskvalitet. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1989; 109: 3229-34.
16. Grøn F. Det norske medicinske Selskab 1833-1933. Oslo: Steenskeboktrykkeri Johannes Bjørnstad a/s, 1933.
17. Lock S. One hand clapping. BMJ 1990; 301: 677-8.
18. Warren KS. From papyrus to parchment to paper to pixels: information technology and the future of medical publishing. I: Lock S, red. The future of medical journals. London: British Medical Journal, 1991.
19. de Solla Price DJ. Science since Babylon. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1961.
20. Varmus H. Shattuck lecture -Biomedical research enters the steady state. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 811-5.
21. Durack D. The weight of medical knowledge. N Engl J Med 1978; 298: 773-5.
22. Cooter M. Demographics. European Science Editing 1994; 52: 13.
23. Regalado A. Multiauthored papers on the rise. Science 1995; 268: 25.
24. Epstein RJ. Six authors in search of a citation: villains or victims of the Vancouver convention BMJ 1993; 306: 765-7.
25. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Guidelines on authorship. BMJ 1985; 291: 722.
26. Shapiro DW, Wenger NS, Shapiro MF. The contribution of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. JAMA 1994; 271: 438-42.
27. Goodman NW. Survey of fulfilment of criteria for authorship in published medical research. BMJ 1994; 309: 1482.
28. Horton R, Smith R. Time to redefine authorship BMJ 1996; 312: 723.
29. Eriksen TB. Budbringerens overtak. Perspektiver på skriftkulturen. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. 1987.