|
|
Volumn 347, Issue 9002, 1996, Pages 683-
|
|
UK bioethics council wants stricter controls on xenotransplantation.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADVISORY COMMITTEE;
ANIMAL;
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
GENETIC MANIPULATION ADVISORY GROUP (GREAT BRITAIN);
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HEART;
HISTORY;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
IMUTRAN LTD.;
INDUSTRY;
NUFFIELD COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS;
ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION;
POLICY;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
RISK;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
SWINE;
TRANSGENIC ANIMAL;
TRANSPLANTATION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED KINGDOM;
XENOGRAFT;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
GENETIC MANIPULATION ADVISORY GROUP (GREAT BRITAIN);
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
IMUTRAN LTD.;
NUFFIELD COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS;
ADVISORY COMMITTEES;
ANIMALS;
ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED;
ETHICS COMMITTEES;
ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HEART;
HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INDUSTRY;
ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RISK;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL;
SWINE;
TRANSPLANTATION;
TRANSPLANTATION, HETEROLOGOUS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
|
EID: 0030576131
PISSN: 01406736
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91231-3 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (2)
|
|
References (0)
|
