|
|
|
Volumn , Issue , 1996, Pages
|
|
The justices' life-or-death choices.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COMPASSION IN DYING V. STATE OF WASHINGTON;
CRIMINAL LAW;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
HUMAN;
INDUCED ABORTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PHYSICIAN;
POPULAR APPROACH/SOURCE;
QUILL V. VACCO;
RIGHT TO DIE;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
COMPASSION IN DYING V. STATE OF WASHINGTON;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
POPULAR APPROACH/SOURCE;
QUILL V. VACCO;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CRIMINAL LAW;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
NEW YORK;
PHYSICIANS;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
TERMINALLY ILL;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WASHINGTON;
|
|
EID: 0030573397
PISSN: 03624331
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (1)
|
|
References (0)
|
