Donor/acceptor coupling in mixed-valent dinuclear iron polypyridyl complexes: Experimental and theoretical considerations

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 118, Issue 22, 1996, Pages 5221-5228

  Elliott, C Michael ^a   Derr, Daniel L ^a   Ferrere, Suzanne ^a,c   Newton, Marshall D ^b   Liu, Y P ^b  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DONOR ACCEPTOR COUPLING; ELECTRON TRANSFER; IRON POLYPYRIDYL COMPLEXES; MIXED VALENT DINUCLEAR COMPLEXES; SEPARATION DISTANCES; SUPEREXCHANGE COUPLING;

CALCULATIONS; CHARGE TRANSFER; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; THEORY;

ORGANOMETALLICS;

IRON; IRON POLYPYRIDYL COMPLEX; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 0030570268     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja954297q     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Deisenhofer, J.; Michel, H. In Chlorophylls; Scheer, H., Ed.; CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 1991; p 613.
2. El-Kabbani, O.; Chang, C. H.; Tiede, D.; Norris, J.; Schiffer, M. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 5361.
3. Iwata, S.; Ostermeier, C.; Ludwig, B.; Michel, H. Nature 1995, 376, 660.
4. Tsukihara, T.; Aoyama, H.; Yamashita, E.; Tomizaki, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Shinzawa-Itoh, K.; Nakashima, R.; Yaono, R.; Yoshikawa, S. Science 1995, 269, 1069.
5. Sutin, N. Progr. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 30, 441.
6. Ferrere, S.; Elliott, C. M. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 5818.
7. Mulliken, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 600. Mulliken, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 811. Mulliken, R. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1952, 56, 801.
8. Mulliken, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 600. Mulliken, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 811. Mulliken, R. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1952, 56, 801.
9. Mulliken, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 600. Mulliken, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1952, 74, 811. Mulliken, R. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1952, 56, 801.
10. Hush, N. S. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1967, 8, 391.
11. Serr, B. R.; Andersen, K. A.; Elliott, C. M.; Anderson, O. P. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 4499.
12. Sawyer, D. T.; Roberts, J. L. Experimental Electrochemistry for Chemists; Wiley: New York, 1974.
13. Gould, S.; Strouse, G. F.; Meyer, T. J.; Sullivan, P. B. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 2942.
14. (a) Rudolph, M. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1991, 314, 13.
15. (b) Rudolph, M. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1992, 338, 85.
16. (c) Rudolph, M. In Physical Chemistry: Principles, Methods and Applications; Rubenstein, I., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1995; pp 81-129.
17. (a) Mayo, S. L.; Olafson, B. D.; Goddard, W. A., III. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 8897.
18. (b) Rappé, A. K.; Goddard, W. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 3358.
19. (c) Stouch, T. R.; Jurs, P. C. J. Chem. Int. Comput. Sci. 1986, 26, 4.
20. O'Dea, J. J.; Osteryoung, J.; Osteryoung, R. A. Anal. Chem. 1981, 53, 695.
21. IT for the 4+ and 6+ oxidation states could have been constrained to be the values obtained from the initial and final spectra. However, given the signal-to-noise ratio in this spectral region and the likely measurement error, it seemed more reasonable to obtain these values from the fit since it is significantly overdetermined.
22. (a) Brunschwig, B. S.; Ehrenson, S.; Sutin, N. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3657.
23. (b) Goodman, B. A.; Raynor, J. B. Adv. Inorg. Radiochem. 1970, 19, 135.
24. (a) Baker, J.; Engelhardt, L. M.; Figgis, B. N.; White, A. H. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1975, 530.
25. (b) Zalkin, A.; Templeton, D. H.; Veki, T. Inorg. Chem. 1973, 12, 1641.
26. Cruetz, C. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 30, 1 and references therein.
27. Cannon, R. D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1977, 49, 299.
28. Brown, G. M.; Sutin, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 883.
29. 1/2(4+/5+), solvent studies have not yet been undertaken.
30. (a) Lowery, M. D.; Hammack, W. S.; Drickamer, H. G.; Hendrickson, D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 8019.
31. (b) Hupp, J. T.; Dong, Y.; Blackboum, R. L.; Lu, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 97, 3278.
32. (a) Zerner, M. C.; Loew, G. H.; Kirchner, R. F.; Mueller-Westerhoff, U. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 589.
33. (b) ZINDO: A comprehensive semiempirical SCF/CI package written by M. C. Zerner and co-workers, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
34. (a) Newton, M. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 30.
35. (b) Newton, M. D.; Ohta, K.; Zhong, E. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 2317.
36. (c) Newton, M. D. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 767.
37. Cave, R. J.; Newton, M. D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 249, 15.
38. (a) Reimers, J. R.; Hush, N. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 9773.
39. (b) Creutz, C; Newton, M. D.; Sutin, N. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 1994, 82, 47.
40. The validity of this assumption has been demonstrated by more detailed calculations, which take explicit account of the expansion coefficients for the orbital and CI eigenfunctions (Cave, R. J.; Newton, M. D. To be published).
41. Shin, Y.-G. K., Brunschwig, B. S.; Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8668.
42. Newton, M. D.; Cave, R. J. In Molecular Electronics; Jortner, J., Ratner, M. A., Eds.; Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, in press.
43. Liang, C.; Newton, M. D. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 3199.
44. (a) Creutz, C.; Taube, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 3988.
45. (b) Creutz, C.; Taube, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 1086.
46. (c) Callahan, R. W.; Brown, G. M.; Meyer, T. J. Inorg. Chem. 1975, 14, 1443.
47. (d) Goldsby, K. A.; Meyer, T. J. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 3002.