Modelling of stochastic dynamic systems using Hamilton's law of varying action

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Volumn 192, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 399-412

  Agrawal, O P ^a   Sonti, Venkata R ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; DYNAMICS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MECHANICAL CONTROL EQUIPMENT; POLYNOMIALS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

EXTERNAL FORCING FUNCTIONS; GAUSSIAN RANDOM VARIABLES; HAMILTONS LAW OF VARYING ACTION; KARHUNEN LOEVE EXPANSION; POLYNOMIAL COEFFICIENTS; SPRING MASS DAMPED SYSTEM; STATE VARIABLES; STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC SYSTEMS;

VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

EID: 0030563724     PISSN: 0022460X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1996.0194     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. W. R. HAMILTON 1834 Transactions of the Royal Society London 124, 247-308. On a general method in dynamics.
2. W. R. HAMILTON 1835 Transactions of the Royal Society 125, 95-144. Second essay on a geneal method in dynamics.
3. C. D. BAILEY 1975 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal 13, 1154-1157. Application of Hamilton's law of varying action.
4. C. D. BAILEY 1976 Computational Methods in Applied Mechanical Engineering 7, 235-247. Method of Ritz applied to the equation of Hamilton.
5. C. D. BAILEY 1976 Journal of Applied Mechanics 43, 684-688. Hamilton's, Ritz and elastodynamics.
6. D. L. HITZL 1980 Journal of Computational Physics 38, 185-211. Implementing Hamilton's law of varying action with shifted Legendre polynomials.
7. O. P. AGRAWAL and S. SAIGAL 1987 International Journal of Mechanical Science 29, 285-292. A novel, computationally efficient approach for Hamilton's law of varying action.
8. T. E. SIMKINS 1978 American Institute of Aernautics and Astronautics Journal 16, 559-563. Unconstrained variational statements for initial and boundary-value problems.
9. n correct formulations.
10. M. BORRI, G. L. GHIRINGHELLI, M. LANZ, P. MANTEGAZZA and T. MERLINI 1985 Computers and Structures 20, 495-508. Dynamic response of mechanical systems by a weak Hamiltonian formulation.
11. D. A. PETERS and A. IZADPANAH 1988 Computational Mechanics 3, 73-88. hp-Version finite elements for the space time domain.
12. D. H. HODGES and R. R. BLESS 1991 Journal of Guidance 14, 148-156. Weak Hamiltonian finite element method for optimal control problems.
13. V. R. SONTI and O. P. AGRAWAL 1995 International Journal of Mechanical Science 37, 601-613. Design sensitivity analysis of dynamic systems using Hamilton's law of varying action.
14. Y. K. LIN 1967 Probabilistic Theory of Structural Dynamics. New York: McGraw Hill.
15. N. C. NIGAM 1983 Introduction to Random Vibrations. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
16. D. E. NEWLAND 1993 An Introduction to Random Vibrations, Spectral and Wavelet Analysis. New York: John Wiley.
17. H. L. VAN-TREES 1968 Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part 1. New York: John Wiley.
18. H. J. LARSON and B. O. SHUBERT 1979 Probabilistic Models in Engineering Sciences, Volume 2. New York: John Wiley.
19. M. R. SPIEGEL 1968 Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables. New York: McGraw Hill.