What do disputants want? Preferences for third party resolution procedures

Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 130-140

  Schuller, Regina A ^a   Hastings, Patricia A ^b  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030560289     PISSN: 0008400X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0008-400X.28.2.130     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bies, R.J., & Shapiro, D.L. (1987). Interactional justice: The influence of causal accounts. Justice Research, 1, 199-218.
2. Bies, R.J., & Tyler, T.R. (1993). The litigation mentality in organizations: A test of alternative psychological explanations. Organization Science, 4, 352-366.
3. Brett, J.M., & Goldberg, S.B. (1983). Grievance mediation in the coal industry: A field experiment. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 37, 49-69.
4. Gulliver, P.H. (1979). Disputes and negotiations: A cross-cultural perspective. New York: Academic Press.
5. Heuer, L.B., & Penrod, S. (1986). Procedural preference as a function of conflict intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 700-710.
6. Houlden, P., LaTour, S., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. (1978). Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 13-30.
7. Howell, D.C. (1992). Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: PWS-Kent.
8. Keashly, L. (1994). The influence of intervention role on criteria for dispute intervention: Parents and friends as intervenors. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 22-33.
9. Kelly, J.B., & Gigy, L.L. (1989). Divorce mediation: Characteristics of clients and outcomes. In K. Kressel & Dean G. Pruitt (Eds.), Mediation research (pp. 263-283). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Kressel, K., & Pruitt, D.G. (1989). Conclusion: A research perspective on the mediation of social conflict. In K. Kressel & D.G. Pruitt (Eds.), Mediation Research, (pp. 394-435). San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. LaTour, S., Houlden, P., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. (1976). Some determinants of preference for modes of conflict resolution. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20, 319-356.
12. Leung, K. (1987). Some determinants of reactions to procedural models for conflict resolution: A cross-national study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 898-908.
13. Leung, K., & Lind, E.A. (1986). Procedural justice and culture: Effects of culture, gender, and investigator status on procedural preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1134-1140.
14. Leung, K., Bond, M.H., Carment, D.W., Krishnan, L., & Liebrand, W.B.G. (1990). Effects of cultural femininity on preference for methods of conflict processing: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 373-388.
15. Lewicki, R.J., & Sheppard, B.H. (1985). Choosing how to intervene: Factors affecting the use of process and outcome control in third party dispute resolution. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 6, 49-64.
16. Lind, E.A., & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
17. Lissak, R.I., & Sheppard, B.H. (1983). Beyond fairness: The criterion problem in research on dispute intervention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 45-65.
18. McEwen, C.A., & Maiman, R.J. (1984). Mediation in small claims court: Achieving compliance through consent. Law and Society Review, 18, 11-50.
19. McEwen, C.A., & Maiman, R.J. (1986). In search of legitimacy: Toward an empirical analysis. Law & Policy, 8, 257-273.
20. Nader, L., & Todd, H.F. (1978). The disputing process: Law in ten societies. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. Pearson, J. (1982). An evaluation of alternatives to court adjudication. The Justice System Journal, 7, 420-444.
22. Pearson, J., & Thoennes, N. (1989). Divorce mediation: Reflections on a decade of research. In K. Kressel & Dean G. Pruitt (Eds.), Mediation research (pp. 9-30). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
23. Pinkley, R.L. (1990). Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 117-126.
24. Poythress, N.G., Schumacher, J., Wiener, R., & Murrin, M. (1994). Procedural justice judgments of alternative procedures for resolving medical malpractice claims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1639-1658.
25. Pruitt, D.G., Peirce, R.S., McGillicuddy, N.B., Welton, G.L., & Castrianno, L.M. (1993). Long-term success in mediation. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 313-329.
26. Roehl, J.A., & Cook, R.F. (1985). Issues in mediation: Rhetoric and reality revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 161-178.
27. Roehl, J.A., & Cook, R.F. (1989). Mediation in interpersonal disputes: Effectiveness and limitations. In K. Kressel & Dean G. Pruitt (Eds.), Mediation research (pp. 31-52). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. Sarat, A. (1976). Alternatives in dispute processing: Litigation in a small claims court. Law and Society, 339-375.
29. Shapiro, D.L., & Brett, J.M. (1993). Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1167-1177.
30. Sheppard, B.H. (1984). Third party conflict intervention: A procedural framework. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 141-190.
31. Sheppard, B.H., Saunders, D.M., & Minton, J.W. (1988). Procedural justice from the third-party perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 629-637.
32. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Thibaut, J., Walker, L., LaTour, S., & Houlden, P. (1974). Procedural justice as fairness. Stanford Law Review, 26, 1271-1289.
34. Triandis, H.C. (1987). Collectivism vs. individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural social psychology. In C. Bagley & G.K. Verma (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and values: Cross-cultural perspectives of childhood and adolescence (pp. 60-95). London: MacMillan.
35. Tyler, T.R. (1987). In theory: The psychology of disputant concerns in mediation. Negotiation Journal, 367-374.
36. Tyler, T.R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
37. Vidmar, N. (1984). The small claims court: A reconceptualization of disputes and an empirical investigation. Law and Society Review, 18, 515-550.
38. Vidmar, N. (1986). The mediation of small claims court disputes: A critical perspective. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 187-206.
39. Vidmar, N. (1987). Assessing the effects of case characteristics and settlement forum on dispute outcomes and compliance. Law and Society Review, 21, 155-164.
40. Vidmar, N. (1992). Procedural justice and alternative dispute resolution. Psychological Science, 3, 224-228.
41. Walker, L., LaTour, S., Lind, E.A., & Thibaut, J. (1974). Reactions of participants and observers to modes of adjudication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 295-310.