Field analysis of occupancy sensor operation: Parameters affecting lighting energy savings

Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 83-92

  Richman, E E ^a   Dittmer, A L ^a   Keller, J M ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DATA ACQUISITION; DAYLIGHTING; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; LIGHTING FIXTURES; PERFORMANCE; SENSORS; TESTING;

BUILDING SPACES; LIGHTING ENERGY SAVINGS; LIGHTING WATTAGE; OCCUPANCY LIGHTING CONTROL; OCCUPANCY SENSOR; WASTED LIGHT HOURS;

LIGHTING;

EID: 0030559787     PISSN: 00994480     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00994480.1996.10748136     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Maniccia, D., and Luan, X., 1994. Methods for assessing the maintained and initial detection performance of occupancy sensors. J of the IES 23 (no. 2):108–115.
2. Stolshek, J.D., and Koehring, P.A., Jr. 1984. Ultrasonic technology provides for control of lighting. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 20 (no. 6);1564–1572.
3. Dagle, J.E., 1992. A field demonstration of energy conservation using occupancy sensor lighting control in equipment rooms PNL-8320, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA. Springfield, VA:NTIS.
4. Jankowski, W., 1993. Occupancy sensors yield 25–75 percent energy savings. Facilities Des and Mgmt 12 (no. 4):25.
5. DeLeo, D., 1986. Sensors light the way from security to energy savings. Energy Mgmt Technol 10 (no. 1):48–49.