The capital jury: Is it tilted toward death?

Judicature

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 220-223

  Bowers, William J ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030556686     PISSN: 00225800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. 408 U.S. 238 (1972) (per curiam).
2. States have been chosen to represent the principal forms of guided discretion capital statutes, and to ensure regional diversification of the sample. See Bowers, The Capital Jury Project: Rationale, Design, and Preview of Early Findings, 70 IND. L.J. 1043 (1995) for a discussion of the state sample selection criteria and a listing of the participating states.
3. Luginbuhl and Howe, Discretion in Capital Sentencing Instructions: Guided or Misguided?, 70 IND. L.J. 1161, 1170 (1995).