Consultant verbal control and consultee perceptions

Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 107-118

  Houk, Jack L ^a,c   Lewandowski, Lawrence J ^b  

^a Syracuse City School District

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Syracuse University ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030556075     PISSN: 10474412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532768xjepc0702_1     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bergan, J., & Tombari, M. (1975). The analysis of verbal interactions occuring during consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 13, 209-225.
2. Bergan, J., & Tombari, M. (1976). Consultant skill and efficiency and the implementation and outcome of consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 14, 3-14.
3. Caplan, G. (1970). The theory and practice of mental health consultation. New York: Basic Books.
4. Conoley, J., & Conoley, C. (1981). Toward prescriptive consultation. In J. C. Conoley & C. M. Conoley (Eds.), Consultation in schools (pp. 265-293). New York: Academic.
5. Conoley, J., & Welsh, K. (1988). The empowerment of women in school psychology: Paradoxes of success and failure. Professional School Psychology, 3, 13-19.
6. Erchul, W. (1987). A relational communication analysis of control in school consultation. Professional School Psychology, 2, 113-124.
7. Gutkin, T., & Curtis, M. (1982). School-based consultation: Theory and techniques. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 796-828). New York: Wiley.
8. Harris, A., Ingraham, C., & Lam, M. (1994). Teacher expectations for female and male school-based consultants. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 5, 115-142.
9. Little, S. (1990, April). Analogue acceptability research: External validity. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, San Francisco, CA.
10. Martens, B., Lewandowski, L., & Houk, J. (1989a). A correlational analysis of verbal interactions during the consultative interview and subsequent consultee perceptions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 234-339.
11. Martens, B., Lewandowski, L., & Houk, J. (1989b). The effects of entry information on the consultation process. School Psychology Review, 18, 225-234.
12. Pryzwansky, W. (1986). Indirect service delivery: Considerations for future research in consultation. School Psychology Review, 15, 479-488.
13. Rogers, L., & Farace, R. (1975). Analysis of relational communication in dyads: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1, 222-239.