Contextual Control of Latent Inhibition by the Reinforcer

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 45-59

  Killcross, Simon ^a,b   Dickinson, Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030555199     PISSN: 02724995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713932613     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baker, A.G., & Mackintosh, N.J. (1977). Excitatory and inhibitory conditioning following uncorrelated presentations of CS and UCS. Animal Learning and Behavior, 5, 315-319.
2. Baker, A.G., & Mackintosh, N.J. (1979). Preexposure to the CS alone, US alone, or CS and US uncorrelated: Latent inhibition, blocking by context or learned irrelevance? Learning and Motivation, 10, 278-294.
3. Baker, A.G., & Mercier, P. (1982). Extinction of context and latent inhibition. Learning and Motivation, 13, 391-416.
4. Bianchi, C., & Marazzi-Uberti, E. (1969). Acquisition and retention of a conditioned avoidance response in mice as influenced by pemoline, by some of its derivatives and by some CNS stimulants. Psychopharmacologia, 15, 9-18.
5. Bouton, M.E. (1991). Context retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning. In L.W. Dachowski, & C.F. Flaherty (Eds.), Current topics in animal learning: Brain emotion and cognition (pp. 25-53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Bouton, M.E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
7. Bouton, M.E., & King, D.A. (1983). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear: Tests for the associative value of the context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 248-265.
8. Bouton, M.E., & King, D.A. (1986). Effect of context on performance to conditioned stimuli with mixed histories of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 4-15.
9. Bouton, M.E., Rosengard, C., Achenbach, G.G., Peck, C.A., & Brooks, D.C. (1993). Effects of contextual conditioning and unconditional stimulus presentation on performance in appetitive conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46B (1), 63-95.
10. Geller, I., & Seifter, J. (1960). The effects of meprobamate, barbiturates, d-amphetamine, and promazine on experimentally induced conflict in the rat. Psychopharmacologia, 1, 482-492.
11. Hall, G. (1991). Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12. Hall, G., & Channell, S. (1985). Differential effects of contextual change on latent inhibition and on the habituation of the orienting response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 470-481.
13. Hall, G., & Channell, S. (1986). Context specificity of latent inhibition in taste aversion learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38B, 121-139.
14. Hall, G., & Minor, H. (1984). A search for context stimulus associations in latent inhibition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36B, 145-169.
15. Hall, G., & Pearce, J.M. (1979). Latent inhibition of CS during CS-US pairings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 31-42.
16. Hall, G., & Pearce, J.M. (1982). Changes in stimulus associability during conditioning: implications for theories of acquisition. In M.L. Commons, R.J. Hernstein, & A.R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behaviour (pp. 221-239). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
17. Kalat, J.W., & Rozin, P. (1973). "Learned safety" as a mechanism in long-delay taste aversion learning in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 83, 198-207.
18. Kelleher, R.T., & Morse, W.H. (1968). Determinants of the specificity of behavioural effects of drugs. Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Experimental Pharmacology, 60, 1-56.
19. Killcross, A.S., Dickinson, A., & Robbins, T.W. (1994a). Amphetamine-induced disruptions of latent inhibition are reinforcer mediated: Implications for animal models of schizophrenic attentional dysfunction. Psychopharmacology, 115, 185-195.
20. Killcross, A.S., Dickinson, A., & Robbins, T.W. (1994b). Effects of the neuroleptic α-flupenthixol on latent inhibition in aversively-and appetitively-motivated paradigms: Evidence for dopamine reinforcer interactions. Psychopharmacology, 115, 196-205.
21. Killcross, A.S., & Robbins, T.W. (1993). Differential effects of intra-accumbens and systemic amphetamine on latent inhibition using an on-baseline, within-subject conditioned suppression paradigm. Psychopharmacology, 110, 449-459.
22. Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23. Kulkarni, A.S. (1968). Facilitation of instrumental avoidance learning by amphetamine: an analysis. Psychopharmacologia, 13, 418-425.
24. Kumar, R. (1968). Psychoactive drugs, exploratory activity and fear. Nature, 218, 587-588.
25. Lovibond, P.F., Preston, G.C., & Mackintosh, N.J. (1984). Context specificity of conditioning, extinction, and latent inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 360-375.
26. Lubow, R.E. (1973). Latent inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 398-407.
27. Mackintosh, N.J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
28. Mackintosh, N.J. (1983). Conditioning and associative learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. McLaren, I.P.L., Bennett, C., Plaisted, K., Aitken, M., & Mackintosh, N.J. (1994). Latent inhibition, context specificity, and context familiarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 387-400.
30. Matzel, L.D., Schactman, T.R., & Miller, R.R. (1988). Learned irrelevance exceeds the sum of CS-preexposure and US-preexposure deficits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 311-319.
31. Randich, A., & LoLordo, V.M. (1979). Associative and nonassociative theories of the UCS preexposure phenomenon: Implications for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 523-548.
32. Rescorla, R.A. (1971). Summation and retardation tests of latent inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 67, 504-509.
33. Rescorla, R.A., & Wagner, A.R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A.H. Black & W.F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
34. Wagner, A.R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N.E. Spear & R.R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
35. Young, S.L., & Fanselow, M.S. (1992). Associative regulation of Pavlovian fear conditioning: Unconditional stimulus intensity, incentive shifts and latent inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 400-413.