Serving students in middle school content classes: A heuristic study of critical variables linking instruction and assessment

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 414-432

  Tindal, Gerald ^a   Nolet, Victor ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030554743     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002246699602900404     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alexander, P. A., Shallert, D. L., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 61, 315-343.
2. Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1988). On selecting "considerate" content area textbooks. Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 47-52.
3. Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
4. Carnine, D. (1991). Curricular interventions for teaching higher order thinking to all students: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 261-269.
5. Educational Products Information Exchange Institute. (1977). Report on a national study of the nature and quality of instructional materials most used by teachers and learners (Report No. 76). New York: Author.
6. Grossen, B., & Carnine, D. (1992). Translating research on text structure into classroom practice. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24, 48-53.
7. Howell, K., Morehead, M. K., & Fox, S. (1993). Curriculum-based evaluation. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8. Lenz, B. K., Bulgren, J., & Hudson, P. (1990). Content enhancement: A model for promoting the acquisition of content by individuals with learning disabilities. In T. E. Scruggs & B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 122-165). New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Lovitt, T. C., & Horton, S. V. (1994). Strategies for adapting science textbooks for youth with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 105-116.
10. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1992). Science for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 62, 377-412.
11. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1994). Text versus hands-on science curriculum: Implications for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 72-85.
12. McKenzie, R. G. (1991a). Content area instruction delivered by secondary learning disabilities teachers: A national survey. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 115-122.
13. McKenzie, R. G. (1991b). The form and substance of secondary resource models: Content area versus skill instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 467-470.
14. Newmann, F. M. (1991, February). Linking restructuring to authentic student achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 458-463.
15. Nolet, V., & Tindal, G. (1993). Special education in content area classes: Development of a model and practical procedures. Remedial and Special Education, 14(1), 36-48.
16. Psychological Corporation. (1990). Stanford achievement test (8th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Author.
17. Putnam, L. (1992). Testing practices of mainstream secondary classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 13(5), 11-21.
18. Roid, G. H., & Haladyna, T. M. (1982). A technology for test-item writing. New York: Academic Press.
19. Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 376-391). New York: Macmillan.
20. Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1993). Current approaches to science education: Implications for mainstream instruction of students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 14(1), 15-24.
21. Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1992). Performance assessments: Political rhetoric and measurement reality. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 22-27.
22. Tindal, G., Nolet, V., & Blake, G. (1993). Focus on assessment and learning in content classes (Training module no. 4). Eugene: University of Oregon Resource Consultant Training Program.
23. Vavrus, L. (1990, August). Put portfolios to the test. Instructor, pp. 48-51.
24. Wiggins, G. (1990). CLASS. Rochester, NY: Consultants on Learning, Assessment, and School Structure.
25. Woodward, J. (1994). The role of models in secondary science instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 15(2), 94-104.
26. Yell, M., Deno, S. L., & Marston, D. (1992). Barriers to implementing curriculum-based measurement. Diagnostique, 18, 99-112.