Eyewitness testimony and memory distortion

Japanese Psychological Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 5-13

  Manning, Charles G ^a   Loftus, Elizabeth F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Attribution; Cues; Memory; Memory distortion; Misinformation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030554237     PISSN: 00215368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.1996.tb00003.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Alba, J. W., & Hasher, L. (1983). Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 93, 203-231.
2. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press.
3. Belli, R. F., Windschitl, P. D., McCarthy, T. T., c Winfrey, S. E. (1992) Detecting memory impairment with a modified test procedure: Manipulating retention interval with centrally presented event items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 356-367.
4. Birch, S. L., & Brewer, W. F. (1990). Memory permanence versus memory replacement in sentence recall. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
5. Brainerd, C., & Ornstein, P. A. (1991). Children's memory for witnessed events. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections (pp. 10-20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Weingardt, K. R., Toland, H. K., & Loftus, E. F. (1994). Reports of suggested memories: Do people truly believe them? In D. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Togila (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Zaragoza, M. S., & Lane, S. M. (1994). Source mis-attributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 934-945.