Who should manage information and privacy conflicts?: Institutional design for third-party mechanisms

International Journal of Conflict Management

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 21-44

  Duncan, George T ^a   Kaufman, Sanaa ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030551525     PISSN: 10444068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb022774     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anonymous (1993). Canada. Direct Marketing, 56 (4), 69-70.
2. Banks, J. S. (1995). The design of institutions: an agency theory perspective. In D. L. Weimer (Ed.), Institutional design (pp. 17-36). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Cormick, G. W. (1980). The theory and practice of environmental mediation. Environmental Professional, 2 (1), 24-33.
4. Dalenius, T. (1993). Discussion: Informed consent and notification. Journal of Official Statistics, 9, 377-381.
5. Drucker, P. F. (1992). The new society of organizations. Harvard Business Review, 70 (5), 95-104.
6. Duncan, G. T., Jabine, T., & de Wolf, V. (1993). Private lives and public policies: Confidentiality and accessibility of govertment statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Duncan, G. T., & Pearson, R. W. (1991). Enhancing access to data while protecting confidentiality: Prospects for the future. Statistical Science, 6, 219-239.
8. Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (Eds.). (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Flaherty, D. H. (1989). Protecting privacy in suiveillance societies. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
10. Frye, T. (1995). Caveat Emptor: Institutions, contracts and commodity exchanges in Russia. In D. L. Weimer (Ed.), Institutional design (pp. 37-62). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
11. Hoaglin, D. C., Light, R., McPeak, B., Mosteller, F., & Stoto, M. (1982). Data for decisions: Information strategies for policy makers. New York: University Press of America.
12. Kagan, R. (1991). Adversarial legalism and American Government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10, 369-406.
13. Kaufman, S., & Duncan, G. T. (1988). The role of mandates in third party intervention. Negotiation Journal, 4, 403-412.
14. Kaufman, S., & Duncan, G. T. (1989). Third party intervention: A theoretical framework. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 273-289). New York: Praeger.
15. Lax, D., & James S. (1986). The manager as negotiator. New York: Free Press.
16. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
17. Marshall, E. (1993, July 16). Court orders 'sharing' of data. Science, 261, 284-286.
18. Panetta, L. E. (1993). Circular No. A-130. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.
19. Rosenblatt, R. (1993, January 31). Who killed privacy? New York Times Magazine, pp. 24-28.
20. Seymour, J. (1991, February 4). Lotus' Marketplace succumbs to market hysteria. PC Week, p. 57.
21. Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. J., & Minton, J. W. (1992). Organizational justice. New York: Lexington Books.
22. Smith, J. P. (1991, August). Data confidentiality: A researcher's perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Statistical Association, Anaheim, CA.
23. Weimer, D. L. (Ed.). (1995). Institutional design. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
24. Winner, L. (1991). A victory for computer populism. Technology Review, 94 (4), 66.
25. Woodside, K. B. (1995). Institutions for the settlement of trade disputes: The case of the Canada-United States free trade agreement. In D. L. Weimer (Ed.), Institutional design (pp. 113-160). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.