Evaluation of subsurface oxygen sensors for remediation monitoring

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 106-111

  Li, Dong X ^a   Lundegard, Paul D ^a  

^a CHEVRON ENERGY TECHNOLOGY COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; DATA ACQUISITION; FLOW OF FLUIDS; GASES; IMPURITIES; MONITORING; SOIL POLLUTION; SOILS; VAPORS;

AIR SPARGING; BIOREMEDIATION; BIOVENTING; REMEDIATION MONITORING; SOIL GASES; SUBSURFACE OXYGEN SENSORS;

OXYGEN SENSORS;

EID: 0030551291     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1996.tb00577.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Deyo, B.G., G.A. Robbins, and G.K. Binkhorst. 1993. Use of portable oxygen and carbon dioxide detectors to screen soil gas for subsurface gasoline contamination. Ground Water 31, no. 4: 598-604.
2. Dupont, R.R., W.J. Doucette, and R.E. Hinchee. 1991. Assessment of in situ bioremediation potential and the application of bioventing at a fuel-contaminated site. In Proceedings of the 1991 International Conference on On-Site and In Situ Bioremediation, ed. R.E. Hinchee and R.E. Olfenbuttal, 262-282. Stoneham, Massachusetts: Butterworth-Heineman.
3. Hinchee, R.E., and S.K. Ong. 1992. A rapid in situ respiration test for measuring aerobic biodegradation rates of hydrocarbons in soil. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 42, 1303-1312.
4. Hoeppel, R.E., R.E. Hinchee, and M.F. Arthur. 1991. Bioventing soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. J. Ind. Microbiol. 141-146.
5. Johnson, R.L., P.C. Johnson, D.B. McWhorter, R.E. Hinchee, and I. Goodman. 1993. An overview of in situ air sparging, Ground Water Monitoring Review 13, no. 4: 127-135.
6. Li, D.X. 1995a. Continuous bioventing monitoring using a new sensor technology. In Monitoring and verification of bioremediation 3(5), ed. R.E. Hinchee, G.S. Douglas, and S.K. Ong. 115-126. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle.
7. Li, D.X. 1995b. Bioventing feasibility, assessment, and system design using subsurface oxygen sensors. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 45, 762-769.
8. Lundegard, P.D. 1994. Actual versus apparent radius of influence - An air sparging pilot test in a sandy aquifer. In Proceedings of the 1994 Conference of the Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water, 191-206, by National Ground Water Association. Dublin, Ohio: NGWA/API.
9. Lundegard, P.D., and D. LaBrecque. 1995. Air sparging in a sandy aquifer (Florence, Oregon): Actual and apparent radius of influence. J. Contain. Hydrology 19, 1-27.
10. Madsen, E.L. 1991. Determining in situ biodegradation: Facts and challenges. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25, no. 10:1663-1673.
11. Mohr, D.H. 1995. Mass transfer concepts applied to in situ air sparging. Presented at the 3rd International In Situ and On-Site Bioreclamation Symposium, San Diego, California.
12. Ririe, G.T., and R.E. Sweeney. 1993. Comparison of hydrocarbon gases in soils from natural seeps and anthropogenic sources. In Proceedings of the 1993 Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection, and Restoration, 593-607, by National Ground Water Association. Dublin, Ohio: NGWA.
13. U.S. EPA. 1991. Chemical Sensors Session, Second International Symposium on Field Screening Methods for Hazardous Waste and Toxic Chemicals. Las Vegas, Nevada: U.S. EPA/EMSL.
14. U.S. EPA. 1993. Chemical Sensors Sessions, the 1993 U.S: EPA/A&WMA International Symposium on Field Screening Methods for Hazardous Waste and Toxic Chemicals. Vol. 1. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Air & Waste Management Association.