Attitude constraint and stability among elite and mass in Sweden

European Journal of Political Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 59-72

  Granberg, Donald ^a   Holmberg, Sören ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030549099     PISSN: 03044130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1996.tb00641.x     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Achen, C. (1975). Mass political attitudes and the survey response, American Political Science Review 69: 1218-1231.
2. Bennulf, M. & Holmberg, S. (1990). The Green breakthrough in Sweden, Scandinavian Political Studies 13: 165-184.
3. Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics, pp. 206-261 in D. Apter (ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.
4. Converse, P. & Markus, G. (1979). Plus ça change .... The new CPS election study panel, American Political Science Review 73: 32-49.
5. Converse, P. & Pierce, R. (1986). Political representation in France. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. Granberg, D. & Holmberg, S. (1988). The political system matters: Social psychology and voting behaviour in Sweden and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Holmberg, S. (1974). 'Riksdagen representerar Svenska folkef Empiriska studier i representativ demokrati. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
8. Holmberg, S. (1989). Political representation in Sweden, Scandanavian Political Studies 12: 1-36.
9. Holmberg, S. (1991). The impact of party on nuclear power attitudes in Sweden, Stockholm: Statens Kärnbränsle Nämnd.
10. Holmberg, S. (1994). Election studies: The Swedish way, European Journal of Political Research 25: 309-322.
11. Holmberg, S. & Esaiasson, P. (1988). De folkvalda. En bok om Riksdagledamöterna och den representativa demokrati i Sverige. Stockholm: Bonniers.
12. Inglehart, R. (1985). Aggregate stability and individual-level flux in mass belief systems: The level of analysis paradox, American Political Science Review 79: 97-116.
13. Jennings, K. (1992). Ideological thinking among mass publics and political elites, Public Opinion Quarterly 56: 419-441.
14. Judd, C. & Milburn, M. (1980). The structure of attitude systems in the general public: Comparisons of a structural equations model, American Sociological Review 45: 627-643.
15. Kelley, H. & Volkart, E. (1952). The resistance to change of group-anchored attitudes, American Sociological Review 17: 453-465.
16. Kinder, D. & Sears, D. (1985). Public opinion and political action, pp. 659-741 in G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (eds.), Handbook of social psychology, 3rd edn. New York: Random House.
17. McAllister, I. (1991). Party elites, voters and political attitudes: Testing three explanations for mass-elite differences, Canadian Journal of Political Science 24: 237-268.
18. Nie, N., Verba, S. & Petrocik, J. (1976). The changing American voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
19. Niemi, R. & Westholm, A. (1984). Issues, parties, and attitude stability: A comparative study of Sweden and the United States, Electoral Studies 3: 65-83.
20. Page, B. & Shapiro, R. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Petersson, O., Hirdman, Y., Persson, I., Olsen, J. & Westholm, A. (1990). Demokrati och maki i Sverige. (SOU 1990: 44) Stockholm: Graphic Systems.
22. Pollis, N. (1967). Relative stability of scales formed in individual, togetherness and group situations, British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 6: 249-255.
23. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.
24. Sidanius, J., Brewer, R., Banks, E. & Ekehammar, B. (1987). Ideological constraint, political interest and gender: A Swedish-American comparison, European Journal of Political Research 15: 471-492.
25. Stone, W. (1967). Autokinetic norms: An experimental analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5: 76-81.
26. Sullivan, J., Piereson, J. & Marcus, G. (1978). Ideological constraint in the mass public: A methodological critique and some new findings, American Journal of Political Science 22: 233-249.