A Comparison of Three Prompting Methods for Training Software Use

Journal of Organizational Behavior Management

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 27-44

  Karlsson, Thorlakur ^a   Chase, Philip N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030547469     PISSN: 01608061     EISSN: 15408604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J075v16n01_03     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderson, R. C., & Faust, O. W. (1973). Educational psychology: The science of irisrruction & learning. New York: Harper & Row.
2. Bradley-Johnson, S., Sundennan, P., & Johnson, C. M. (1983). Comparison of delayed prompting and fading for teaching preschoolers easily confused letters & numbers. Journal of School Psychology, 21,321-335.
3. Brownell, B. A. (1985). Usirig microcomputers. Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
4. Chase, P. N. (1985). Designing courseware: Prompts from behavioral instruction. The Behavior Analyst, 465-77.
5. Chase, P. N., Hyten, C., Karlsson, T., Silberman, D., & Smith, J. (1986, August). Esiablishing criteriori reference software reviews: A behavior analysis sysiern. Paper presented at the 94th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington D.C.
6. Gilbert, T. F. (1978). Human Conipeience: Engineering worthy peqlorrnance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Gist, M. E, Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-eficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal Applied Psychology, 74, 884-891.
8. Goldstein, I. R. (1986). Training in organizaiioris: Needs assessmeni, developrnenl, and evaluaiioit (2nd ed.). Montery, CA: BrookslCole.
9. Gollin, E. S., & Savoy, P. (1968). Fading procedures and conditional discrimination in children. Journal of ilte Experitnenial Analysis of Behavioc 11, 443-451.
10. Halle, J. W., Marshall, A. M., & Spradlin, J. E. (1979). Time delay: A technique to increase language use and facilitate generalization in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12,431-439.
11. Holland, A. L., & Matthcws, J. (1963). Application ofteaching machine concepts to speech pathology and audiology. Asha, 5,474-482.
12. Karlsson, T. (1989). A comparison of three-prompt fading methods in computer software training (Doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, 1988). Disserialion Absiracis Iniernalional, 51,26-51B.
13. Mace, S. (1986, March 31). Back to school for micro training. Info World, pp. 28-29, 31.
14. Markle, S. M. (1983). Designs for insiruciional designers. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing Company.
15. Moore, R., & Goldiamond, I. (1964). Errorless establishment of visual discrirnination using fading procedures. Jotrrnal of the Experirnenial Analysis of Behavior, 7,269-272.
16. Poppen, L., & Poppen, R. (1988). The use of behavioral principles in educational sotlware. Educaiional Technology, 28,31-41.
17. Sidman, M., & Stoddard, L. T. (1967). The effectiveness of fading in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children. Journal of the Experirnenial Analysis of Behavior, 10,3-15.
18. Snell, M. E. (1982). Analysis of time delay procedures in teaching daily living skills to retarded adults. Aiialysis and lnierveniiott in Developmenial Disabilities, 2, 139-155.
19. Terrace, H. S. (1963). Discrimination learning with and without “errors.” Journal of the Experitnenial Analysis of Behavior, 6, 1-27.
20. Tiemann, P. W., & Markle, S. M. (1986). Efecis ofvatying inieraciive strategies provided by compuier-based luiorials for a sofhvare applicaiion program. (Tech. Rep. No. 2-86). Chicago: University of Illinois, Instructional Research and Development Laboratory.
21. Touchette, P. E. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of ihe Experinienial Analpis of Behavior, 18, 347-354.
22. vom Saal, W., & Jenkins, H. J. (1970). Blocking the development of stimulus control. Learning and Moiivalion, 1, 52-64.