The politics of requesting: Strategic behavior and public utility regulation

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 395-423

  Campbell, Heather E ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030546268     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199622)15:3<395::AID-PAM4>3.0.CO;2-D     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alabama in re Continental Telephone Co. of the South (1984), 62 PUR 4th.
2. Averch, Harvey and Leland L. Johnson (1962), "Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint," The American Economic Review 52(5), pp. 1052-1069.
3. Baron, David P. (1994), "Electoral Competition with Informed and Uninformed Voters," The American Political Science Review 88(1) (March), pp. 33-47.
4. Berry, William D. (1984), "An Alternative to the Capture Theory of Regulation: The Case of State Public Utility Commissions," American Journal of Political Science 28(3), pp. 524-558.
5. Boyes, William J. and John M. McDowell (1989), "The Selection of Public Utility Commissioners: A Reexamination of the Importance of Institutional Setting," Public Choice 61, pp. 1-13.
6. Campbell, Heather E. (1992), Rate Cases, Political Intervention, and Strategy: An Empirical Study of State Telephone Regulation, Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
7. Campbell, Heather E. (1993), "Looking in the Wrong Place? Implications of a Strategic Model of the Rate Case Process for the Effect of Election of Public Utility Regulators," in Jean Pasquero and Denis Collins (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society.
8. Campbell, Heather E. (1995), "Influencing Bureaucracy? A Research Note on Implications of Measuring Participation in Public Utility Rate Cases," Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 5(3), pp. 319-329.
9. Chirinko, Robert S. and Edward P. Harper Jr. (1993), "Buckle Up or Slow Down? New Estimates of Offsetting Behavior and Their Implications for Automobile Safety Regulation," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12(2) (Spring), pp. 270-296.
10. Cohen, Jeffrey E. (1992), The Politics of Telecommunications Regulation: The States and the Divestiture of AT&T, (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe).
11. Costello, Kenneth W. (1984), "Electing Regulators: The Case of Public Utility Commissioners," Yale Journal on Regulation 2, pp. 83-105.
12. Cudahy, Richard D. (1989), "Return on Investment and Fairness in Regulation," Public Utilities Fortnightly (February), pp. 19-23.
13. Federal Power Commision et al. v. Hope Natural Gas Co. (1944), 320 US 591.
14. Georgia in re Southern Bell Telephone Co. (1985), 63 PUR 4th.
15. Gormley, William T., Jr. (1979), "A Test of the Revolving Door Hypothesis at the FCC," American Journal of Political Science 23(4) (November), pp. 665-683.
16. Gormley, William T., Jr. (1981a), "Nonelectoral Participation as a Response to Issue-Specific Conditions: The Case of Public Utility Regulation," Social Science Quarterly 62(3) (September), pp. 527-539.
17. Gormley, William T., Jr. (1981b), "Public Advocacy in Public Utility Commission Proceedings," Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 17(4), pp. 446-462.
18. Gormley, William T., Jr. (1982), "Alternative Models of the Regulatory Process: Public Utility Regulation in the States," Western Political Quarterly 35 (September), pp. 297-317.
19. Gormley, William T., Jr. (1983a), The Politics of Public Utility Regulation (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press).
20. Gormley, William T., Jr. (1983b), "Policy, Politics, and Public Utility Regulation," American Journal of Political Science 27(1), pp. 86-105.
21. Gormley, William T., Jr. (1986a), "Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System," Polity 18(4) (Summer), pp. 595-620.
22. Gormley, William T., Jr. (1986b), "The Representation Revolution: Reforming State Regulation through Public Representation," Administration and Society 18(2) (August), pp. 179-196.
23. Gormley, William T., Jr. (1987), "Institutional Policy Analysis: A Critical Review," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 6(2), pp. 153-169.
24. Gormley, William T., Jr., John Hoadley, and Charles Williams (1983), "Potential Responsiveness in the Bureaucracy: Views of Public Utility Regulation," The American Political Science Review 77, pp. 704-717.
25. Hagerman, Robert L. and Brian T. Ratchford (1978), "Some Determinants of Allowed Rates of Return on Equity to Electric Utilities," The Bell Journal of Economics 9(1), pp. 46-55.
26. Harris, Malcolm C. and Peter Navarro (1983), "Does Electing Public Utility Commissioners Bring Lower Electric Rates," Public Utilities Fortnightly (September), pp. 23-27.
27. Iowa in re Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. (1988), RPU-88-6.
28. Joskow, Paul L. (1972), "The Determination of the Allowed Rate of Return in a Formal Regulatory Hearing," The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 3, pp. 632-644.
29. Joskow, Paul L. (1973), "Pricing Decision of Regulated Firms: A Behavioral Approach," The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4(1), pp. 118-140.
30. Kamerschen, David R., James B. Kau, and Chris W. Paul, II (1982), "Political Determinants of Rates in Electric Utilities," Policy Studies Review 1(3), pp. 546-556.
31. Kelman, Steven (1992), "Adversary and Cooperationist Institutions for Conflict Resolution in Public Policymaking," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11(2) (Spring), pp. 178-206.
32. Knetsch, Jack L. (1995), "Assumptions, Behavioral Findings, and Policy Analysis," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 14(1) (Winter), pp. 68-78.
33. Lowi, Theodore (1979), The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States, 2nd ed., (New York: W. W. Norton).
34. Lupia, Arthur (1994), "Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections," The American Political Science Review 88(1) (March), pp. 63-76.
35. Meier, Kenneth J. (1993), Politics and the Bureaucracy: Policymaking in the Fourth Branch of Government, 3rd ed., (Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing).
36. National Association of Regulatory U tility Commissioners (1982-1990), Annual Report on Utility and Carrier Regulation (Washington, DC: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners).
37. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Office of Policy Analysis and Development (1985), "Summary of State Telephone Regulatory Data" (Washington, DC: National Telecommunications and Information Administration).
38. Noll, Roger G. (1986), "State Regulatory Responses to Competition and Divestiture in the Telecommunications Industry," in Ronald E. Grieson (ed.), Antitrust and Regulation (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, D.C. Heath and Company).
39. Noll, Roger G. (1987), "The Twisted Pair: Regulation and Competition in Telecommunications," Regulation 11(3/4), pp. 15-22.
40. Olson, Mancur (1971), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
41. Primeaux, Walter J., Jr. and Patrick C. Mann (1985), "Voter Power and Electricity Prices," Public Choice 47, pp. 519-525.
42. Primeaux, Walter J., Jr. and Patrick C. Mann (1986), "Regulator Selection Methods and Electricity Prices," Land Economics 62(1), pp. 1-13.
43. Raifa, Howard (1982), The Art and Science of Negotiation, (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).
44. Roberts, Blaine R., G. S. Maddala, and Gregory Enholm. (1978). "Determinants of the Requested Rate of Return and the Rate of Return Granted in a Formal Regulatory Process," The Bell Journal of Economics 9(2), pp. 611-621.
45. Saltzstein, Grace Hall (1992), "Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Conceptual Issues and Current Research," Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2(1) (January), pp. 63-87.
46. Teske, Paul Eric (1990), After Divestiture: The Political Economy of State Telecommunications Regulation, (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press).
47. Teske, Paul Eric (1991a), "Interests and Institutions in State Regulation," American Journal of Political Science 35(1) (February), pp. 139-54.
48. Teske, Paul Eric (1991b), "Rent-Seeking in the Deregulatory Environment: State Telecommunications," Public Choice 68, pp. 235-243.