Recidivism, proportionalism, and individualized punishment

American Behavioral Scientist

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 474-487

  Finkel, Norman J ^a   Maloney, Stephen T ^a   Valbuena, Monique Z ^a   Groscup, Jennifer ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030540132     PISSN: 00027642     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002764296039004010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Dewar, H. (1992, June 7). When whispers are heard as shouts. Washington Post, p. A23.
2. Edwards, D. (1993, June 7). Congress swamped the courts. Washington Post, p. A21.
3. Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782 (1982).
4. Finkel, N. J. (1990). Capital felony-murder, objective indicia, and community sentiment. Arizona Law Review, 32, 819-913.
5. Finkel, N. J. (1993). Socioscientific evidence and Supreme Court numerology: When justices attempt social science. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 11, 67-77.
6. Finkel, N. J. (1995). Commonsense justice: Jurors' notions of the law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Finkel, N. J., & Duff, K. B. (1991). Felony-murder and community sentiment: Testing the Supreme Court's assertions. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 405-429.
8. Finkel, N. J., Hughes, K. C., Smith, S. F., & Hurabiell, M. L. (1994). Killing kids: The juvenile death penalty and community sentiment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 12, 5-20.
9. Finkel, N. J., & Smith, S. F. (1993). Principals and accessories in capital felony-murder: The proportionality principle reigns supreme. Law & Society Review, 27, 129-156.
10. Fletcher, G. P. (1978). Rethinking criminal law. Boston: Little, Brown.
11. Fox, J. A., Radelet, M. L., & Bonsteel, J. L. (1990-1991). Death penalty opinion in the post-Furman years. Review of Law & Social Change, 18, 499-528.
12. Gillers, S. (1980). Deciding who dies. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 129, 1-124.
13. Goldfarb, R. (1993, May 31). Mindless sentencing. Washington Post, p. A19.
14. Hans, V. P. (1986). An analysis of public attitudes toward the insanity defense. Criminology, 24, 393-414.
15. Isikoff, M. (1993, September 23). Death penalty for drug "kingpins" dropped from crime bill. Washington Post, p. A15.
16. McNamara, E. (1991, November 24). Crime and punishment: . . . How do we punish children who kill? The Boston Globe, p. 14.
17. Regina v. Morgan, 2 W.L.R. 923 (1975); Director of Public Prosecutions v. Morgan, A.C. 182 (1976).
18. Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263 (1980).
19. Seven, R. (1992, October 3). 15-year-old may face death penalty trial. Seattle Times, p. A16.
20. Singer, R. (1987). The resurgence of mens rea: II - Honest but unreasonable mistake of fact in self defense. Boston College Law Review, 28, 459-519.
21. Smith, V. L. (1991). Prototypes in the courtroom: Lay representations of legal concepts. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61, 857-872.
22. Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 (1983).
23. Staff. (1992, June 22). Swamping the courts. Washington Post, p. A16.
24. Staff. (1993, July 7). Mandatory madness. Washington Post, p. A20.
25. Stalans, L. (1993). Citizen's crime stereotypes, biased recall, and punishment preferences in abstract cases: The educative role of interpersonal sources. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 451-470.
26. Stalans, L. J., & Diamond, S. S. (1990). Formation and change in lay evaluations of criminal sentencing: Misperception and discontent. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 199-214.
27. Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989).
28. Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988).
29. Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137 (1987).
30. Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958).
31. Weems v. United States, 217 U.S. 349 (1910).
32. York, M. (1993, April 30). Judge rejects federal sentencing guidelines. Washington Post, p. D5.