Methodology for establishing correlations between sensory and instrumental attributes of crisp products with slight texture differences;Mode d'établissement de corrélations entre données sensorielles et instrumentales pour des produits croustillants présentant de faibles différences de texture

Sciences des Aliments

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 3-22

  Henry Bressolette, Agnès ^a   Launay, Bernard ^b   Danzart, Marc ^b  

^a Ctr Tech Utilisateurs Cereales B   (France)

^b AGROPARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

Canonical variate analysis; Correlation; Sensory analysis; Texture

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030539875     PISSN: 02408813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. AFNOR VO3-707, 1976. Céréales et produits céréaliers - Détermination de la teneur en eau.
2. ANDERSSON Y., DRAKE B., GRANQUIST A., HALLDIN L., JOHANSSON B., PANGBORN R.M., AKESSON C., 1973. Fracture force, hardness and brittleness in crisp bread, with a generalized regression analysis approach to instrumental-sensory comparisons. J. Texture Stud., 4, 119-144.
3. BASSAL A., 1993. Étude de l'activité de l'eau dans les aliments au dessus de 100°C. Thèse de doctorat, Génie des Procédés, Ensia, Massy, France.
4. BEILKEN S.L., EADIE L.M., GRIFFITHS I., JONES P.N., HARRIS P.V., 1991. Assesment of the textural quality of meat patties : correlation of instrumental and sensory attributes. J. Food Sci., 56, 1465-1469.
5. EPESSE PRISO H., DANZART M., HOSSENLOPP J., 1994. A statistical analysis of difference tests with replications. J. Sens. Stud., 9, 121-130.
6. GAZANO G., 1990. De l'importance des différences inter-individuelles en psychophysique descriptive. Thèse de doctorat, Sciences alimentaires, Ensia - Paris VII -Paris XIII, France.
7. HENRY W.F., KATZ M.H., PILGRIM F.J., MAY A.T., 1971. Texture of semi-solid foods: sensory and physical correlates, J. Food Sci., 36, 155-161.
8. ISO 11035, 1994. Sensory analysis -Methodology - Identification of descriptors for establishing a sensory profile (NF V 09-021).
9. ISO 11036, 1994. Sensory analysis - Methodology - Texture profile analysis.
10. LAUNAY B., 1994. Expansion des matériaux amylacés en sortie de filière : caractérisation expérimentale et interprétation, In : COLONNA P., DELLA VALLE G. (éds),La cuisson extrusion, 165-198, Technique et documentation-Lavoisier, Paris.
11. MACFIE H.J.H., BRATCHELL N., GREENHOFF K., VALLIS L.V., 1989. Designs to balance the effect order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests. J. Sens. Stud., 4, 129-148.
12. MACFIE H.J.H., HEDDERLEY D., 1993. Current practice in relating sensory perception to instrumental measurements. Food Qual. Prefer., 4, 41-49.
13. MIOCHE L., PEYRON M-A., 1993. The use of intraoral load cells in the study of texture perception. J. Texture Stud., 24, 361-373.
14. PEYRON M-A., MIOCHE L., 1993. Rôle de la force de morsure dans la perception de la dureté de produits visco-élastiques. Sci. Aliments, 13, 359-365.
15. SCHLICH P., 1993. Risk tables for discrimination tests. Food Qual. Prefer.,4, 141-151.
16. SHERMAN P., DEGHAIDY F.S., 1978. Force-deformation conditions associated with the evaluation of brittleness and crispness in selected foods. J. Texture Stud., 9, 437-459.
17. SZCZESNIAK A.S., 1968. Correlations between objective and sensory texture measurements. Food Technol., 22, 49-54.
18. SZCZESNIAK A.S., 1991. Textural perceptions and food quality. J.Food Qual, 14, 75-85.
19. SZCZESNIAK A.S., BRANDT M.A., FRIEDMAN H.H., 1963. Development of standard rating scales for mechanical parameters of texture and correlation between the objective and the sensory methods of texture evaluation. J. Food Sci 28, 397-403.