The internet as mass medium

Journal of Communication

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 39-50

  Morris, Merrill ^a   Ogan, Christine ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030538912     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01460.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ang, I. (1991.) Desperately seeking the audience. London: Routledge.
2. Bell, D. (1960). The end of ideology. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
3. Boyd-Barrett, O., & Scanlon, E. (Eds.). (1991). Computers and learning. Workingham, England: Addison-Wesley.
4. Blumler, J., & Katz, E. (Eds.). (1974). The uses of mass communications. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5. Cathcart, R., & Gumpert, G. (1983). Mediated interpersonal communication: Toward a new typology. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 267-268
6. Chaffee, S.H., & Mutz, D.C. (1988). Comparing mediated and interpersonal communication data. In R. P. Hawkins et al. (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 19-43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Connolly, T., & Thorn, B.K. (1991). Discretionary data bases: Theory, data, and implications. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield ( Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 219-233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. DeFleur, M., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (1989). Theories of mass communication. 5th Ed. New York: Longman.
9. Dennis, A., & Gallupe, R. (1993). A history of group support systems empirical research: Lessons learned and future directions. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives (pp. 59-77). New York: Macmillan.
10. Fejes, F. (1984). Critical mass communications research and media effects: The problem of the disappearing audience. Media, Culture and Society, 6, 219-232.
11. Krol, E. (1994). The whole Internet: User's guide & catalog (2nd ed). Sebastopol, CA: Reilly.
12. Kuhn, T. (1974). Second thoughts on paradigms. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 459-482). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
13. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people's choice. New York: Duell, Sloan, & Pearce.
14. Lyotard, J.-F. (1983). Answering the question: What is postmodernism? In I. Hassan & S. Hassan (Eds.) Innovation/renovation (pp. 71-82). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
15. Markus, M. ( 1991). Toward a "critical mass" theory of interactive media. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 194-218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. McLuhan, M. (1960) Effects of the improvements of communication media, Journal of Economic History, 20, pp. 566-575.
18. McQuail, D., & Windahl, S. (1993) Communication models for the study of mass communication (2nd ed ). New York: Longman.
19. McQuail, D. (1987). Mass communication theory: An introduction. 2nd Ed. London: Sage.
20. Oates, W. (1982). Effects of computer-assisted instruction in writing skills on journalism students in beginning newswriting classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University., Bloomington.
21. Ogan, C. (1993). Listserver communication during the Gulf War: What kind of medium is the electronic bulletin board? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37(2), 177-196.
22. Oliver, P., Marwell, G., & Teixeira, R. (1985). A theory of the critical mass: Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3) 522-556.
23. O'Shea, T., & Self, J. (1983). Learning and teaching with computers: Artificial intelligence in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24. Poole, M., & Jackson, M. (1993). Communication theory and group support systems. In L. Jessup & J. Valacich (Eds J, Group support systems: New perspectives (pp. 281-293). New York: Macmillan.
25. Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. Hawkins et al. (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (16, pp. 110-134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Rafaeli, S. (1986). The electronic bulletin board: A computer-driven mass medium. Computers and the Social Sciences, 2, 123-136.
27. Rakow, L. (1992). Gender on the line: Women, the telephone and community life. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
28. Reardon, K., & Rogers, E. (1988). Interpersonal versus mass media communication: A false dichotomy. Human Communication Research 15(2), 284-303.
29. Rheingold, H. (1994). The virtual community: Finding connection in a computerized world. London: Seeker & Warburg.
30. Rogers, E. (1986). Communication technology: The new media in society. New York: Free Press.
31. Rogers, E. (1983). Communication as an academic discipline: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 33(3) 18-30.
32. Rosengren, K. (1974). Uses and gratifications: A paradigm outlined. In J. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications (pp. 269-286). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33. Schudson, M. (1992). Was there ever a public sphere? If so, when? Reflections on the American case. In C. Calhoun (Ed.). Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 143-163). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Swift, C. R. (1989). Audience activity in computer-mediated communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
36. Walther, J. B. (1992a). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90.
37. Walther, J. B. (1992b, May). When mediated dyadic communication is not interpersonal. Paper presented at the International Communication Association annual meeting, Miami, FL.
38. Warner, M. (1992). The mass public and the mass subject. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 359-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Wartella, E., & Reeves, B. (1985). Historical trends in research on chldren and the media. Journal of Communication, 35(2), 118-133.