Measurement Error in the Response in the General Linear Model

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Volumn 91, Issue 434, 1996, Pages 633-642

  Buonaccorsi, John P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Calibration; Errors in variables; Imputation; Nonlinear regression; Pseudo maximum likelihood

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030538766     PISSN: 01621459     EISSN: 1537274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476932     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brown, P. J., and Fuller, W. (Eds.) (1990), Statistical Analysis ofMeasurement Error Models and Applications, Providence, RI: American Mathematics Society.
2. Buonaccorsi, J. P. (1989), –Errors in Variables With Systematic Biases,— Communications in Statistics, Part A-Theory and Methods, 18, 10011-021.
3. Buonaccorsi, J. P. (1990a), –Double Sampling For Exact Values in Some Multivariate Measurement Error Problems,— Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 1075-1082.
4. Buonaccorsi, J. P. (1990b), –Double Sampling for Exact Values in The Normal Discriminant Model With Applications to Binary Regression,— Communications in Statistics, Part A-Theory and Methods, 19, 4569-4586.
5. Buonaccorsi, J. P. (1991), –Measurement Error, Linear Calibration, and Inferences for Means,— Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 11, 239-257.
6. Buonaccorsi, J. P., and Tosteson, T. D. (1983), –Measurement Error and Nonlinear Calibration for the Dependent Variable in the Linear Model,— Communications in Statistics, Part A-Theory and Methods, 22, 26872-702.
7. Byar, D., and Gail, M. (Eds.) (1989), –Workshop on Errors in Variables,— Statistics in Medicine, 8, 1020-1179.
8. Carroll, R. J., Gail, M. H., and Lubin, J. H. (1993), "Case-Control Studies With Errors in Covariates, ' Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 185-199.
9. Carroll, R J., and Ruppert, D. (1988), Transformations and Weighting in Regression, London: Chapman and Hall.
10. Carroll, R J., and Stefanski, L. A. (1990), –Approximate Quasi-Likelihood Estimation in Models With Surrogate Predictors,— Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 652-663.
11. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B. (1977), –Maximum Likelihood Estimation From Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm— (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 39, 1-38.
12. Fuller, W. A. (1987), Measurement Error Models, New York: John Wiley.
13. Garden, J. S., Mitchell, D. G., and Mills, W. N. (1990), –Nonconstant Variance Regression Techniques for Calibration Curve-Based Analysis,— Analytical Chemistry, 52, 2310-2315.
14. Huber, P. 1. (1981), Robust Statistics, New York: John Wiley.
15. Osborne, C. (1991), –Statistical Calibration: A Review,— International Statistical Review, 59, 309-336.
16. Pepe, M. S. (1992), –Inference Using Surrogate Outcome Data and a Validation Sample,— Biometrika, 79, 355-365.
17. Rodbard, D., Lenox, R, Wray, H., and Ramseth, D. (1976), –Statistical Characterization of the Random Errors in the Radioimmunoassay DoseResponse Variable,— Clinical Chemistry, 22, 350-358.
18. Rosner, B., Spiegelman, D., and Willett, W. C. (1990), –Correction of Logistic Regression Relative Risk Estimates and Confidence Intervals for Measurement Error: The Case of Multiple Covariates Measured With Error,— American Journal of Epidemiology, 132, 734-745.
19. SAS Institute, Inc. (1980), SAS!STAT User's Guide, Version 6, Vol. 2 (4th ed.), Cary, NC: Author.
20. Seber, G. A E, and Wild, C. 1. (1989), Nonlinear Regression, New York: John Wiley.
21. Spall, J. C. (1989), –Effect of Imprecisely Known Nuisance Parameters on Estimates of Primary Parameters,— Communications in Statistics, Part A-Theory and Methods, 18, 219-237.
22. Tosteson, T. D., Stefanski, L. A, and Schafer, D. W. (1989), –A Measurement Error Model for Binary and Ordinal. Regression,— Statistics in Medicine, 8, 1139-1148.
23. White, H. (1980), "Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity, ' Econometrica, 48, 817-83.