Attentional allocation to syllables in American English

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 893-909

  Finney, Steven A ^a   Protopapas, Athanassios ^b   Eimas, Peter D ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030529313     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0046     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ALLOPENNA, P. (1995). A re-examination of the syllable's role in the on-line segmentation of English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Brown University.
2. ANDERSON, R., & JONES, C. (1974). Three theses concerning phonological representations. Journal of Linguistics, 10, 1-26.
3. BRADLEY, D., SÁNCHEZ-CASAS, R., & GARCÍA-ALBEA, J. (1993). The status of the syllable in the perception of Spanish and English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 197-233.
4. CONNINE, C. M., BLASKO, D. G., & TITONE, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 193-210.
5. CUTLER, A. (1990). Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. CUTLER, A., & BUTTERFIELD, S. (1992). Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 218-236.
7. CUTLER, A., BUTTERFIELD, S., & WILLIAMS, J. (1987). The perceptual integrity of syllabic onsets. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 406-418.
8. CUTLER, A., MEHLER, J., NORRIS, D., & SEGUÍ, J. (1986). The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385-400.
9. CUTLER, A., & NORRIS, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121.
10. FRAUENFELDER, U., SEGUÍ, J., & DIJKSTRA, T. (1990). Lexical effects in phonemic processing: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 77-91.
11. KAHN, D. (1980). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. New York: Garland.
12. LIBERMAN, A. M., COOPER, F. S., SHANKWEILER, D. P., & STUDDERT-KENNEDY, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
13. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14. MEHLER, J., DOMMERGUES, J. Y., FRAUENFELDER, U., & SEGUÍ, J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 298-305.
15. MILBERG, W., BLUMSTEIN, S., & DWORETZKY, B. (1988). Phonological factors in lexical access: Evidence from an auditory lexical decision task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 305-308.
16. MYERS, S. (1987). Vowel shortening in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 485-518.
17. NORRIS, D., & CUTLER, A. (1988). The relative accessibility of phonemes and syllables. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 541-550.
18. PALLIER, C. (1994). Role de la syllabe dans la perception de la parole: Etudes attentionnelles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris.
19. PALLIER, C., SEBASTIÁN-GALLÉS, N., FELGUERA, T., CHRISTOPHE, A., & MEHLER, J. (1993). Attentional allocation within the syllable structure of spoken words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 373-389.
20. PISONI, D. B., & LUCE, P. A. (1987). Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition. Cognition, 25, 21-52.
21. PITT, M., & SAMUEL, A. (1990). Attentional allocation during speech perception: How fine is the focus? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 611-632.
22. POSNER, M., & SNYDER, C. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and Performance V. New York: Academic Press.
23. ROSNOW, R. L., & ROSENTHAL, R. (1995). "Some things you learn aren't so": Cohen's paradox, Asch's paradigm, and the interpretation of interaction. Psychological Science, 6, 3-9.
24. SAVIN, H. B., & BEVER, T. G. (1970). The nonperceptual reality of the phoneme. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 295-302.
25. SEBASTIÁN-GALLÉS, N., DUPOUX, E., SEGUÍ, J., & MEHLER, J. (1992). Contrasting syllable effects in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 18-32.
26. TREIMAN, R., & DANIS, C. (1988). Syllabification of intervocalic consonants. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 87-104.
27. Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary. (1984). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin (Riverside Publishing Company).
28. ZWITSERLOOD, P., SCHRIEFERS, H., LAHIRI, A., & VAN DONSELAAR, W. (1993). The role of syllables in the perception of spoken Dutch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 260-271.