Further exploration of the flight from discretion: The role of risk/need instruments in probation supervision decisions

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 109-121

  Schneider, Anne L ^a   Ervin, Laurie ^b   Snyder Joy, Zoann ^c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030524949     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0047-2352(95)00059-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Berry, R., ed. (1988). Department of Corrections Division of Probation and Parole, assessment history since 1976. Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma Department of Corrections.
2. Brennan, T. (1987a). Classification: An overview of selected methodological issues. In Prediction and classification, crime and justice, vol. 9, A review of research, eds. D. Gottfredson and M. Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Brennan, T. (1987b). Classification for control in jails and prisons. In Prediction and Classification, Crime and Justice, vol. 9, A review of research, eds. D. Gottfredson and M. Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Carroll, J. (1987). A psychological approach to deterrence: The evaluation of crime opportunities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36:1512-20.
5. Collins, D. (1988). Analysis of the Wisconsin assessment of client risk as implemented in Oklahoma. In Department of Corrections Division of Probation and Parole, assessment history since 1976, ed. R. Berry. Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma Department of Corrections.
6. Cornish, D. B., and Clarke, R. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Dawes, R. (1975). Case by case vs. rule-generated procedures for the allocation of scarce resources. In Human judgement and decision processes in applied settings, eds. M. Kaplan and S. Schwartz. New York: Academic Press.
8. Dawes, R., and Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin 81:95-106.
9. Dryzek, J. (1990). Discursive democracy. London: Cambridge University Press.
10. Farrington, D. and Tarling, R. (1983). Criminal prediction. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
11. Fischer, F. (1980). Values and public policy: The problem of methodology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
12. Glaser, D. (1987). Classification for risk. In Prediction and classification, crime and justice, vol. 9, A review of research, eds. D. Gottfredson and M. Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Gottfredson, D. M., and Tonry, M., eds. (1987). Prediction and classification, crime and justice, vol. 9, A review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Gottfredson, M. R., and Gottfredson, D. M. (1988). Decision making in criminal justice. New York: Plenum Press.
15. Gottfredson, S. D. (1987). Prediction: An overview of selected methodological issues. In Prediction and classification, crime and justice, vol. 9, A review of research, eds. D. M. Gottfredson and M. Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Gottfredson, S. D., and Gottfredson, D. M. (1986). The accuracy of prediction. In Criminal careers and "career criminals", eds. A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. Roth, and C. Visher. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
17. Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation crisis. Translated by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
18. Hatley, E. (1989). Interviews with Oklahoma Correctional Personnel, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
19. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
20. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage.
21. Meehl, P. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
22. Petersilia, J., and Turner, S. (1987). Guideline-Based justice: Prediction and racial minorities. In Prediction and classification, crime and justice, vol. 9, A review of research, eds. D. M. Gottfredson and M. Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Pinkele, C. F., and Louthan, W. C. (1985). Discretion, justice, and democracy. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
24. Sigler, R., and Williams, J. J. (1994). A study of the outcomes of probation officers and risk-screening instruments classifications. Journal of Criminal Justice 22:495-502.
25. Simon, J. (1993). Poor discipline. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Stone, D. (1993). Clinical authority in the construction of citizenship. In Public policy and democracy, eds. H. Ingram and S. R. Smith. Washington, DC: Brookings.
27. Walker, S. (1993). Taming the system: The control of discretion in criminal justice, 1950-1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Wright, G. (1984). Behavioral decision theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Wright, K., Clear, T., and Dickson, P. (1984). Universal applicability of probation risk-assessment instruments: A critique. Criminology 22:113-34.