How Do the Efficiencies of Reading Subcomponents Relate to Looking Back in Text?

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 537-545

  Walczyk, Jeffrey J ^a,c   Taylor, Robert W ^b  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BENEDICTINE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030523015     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.537     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baddeley, A., Logie, R., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Brereton, N. (1985). Components of fluent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 119-131.
2. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In D. P. Pearson, M. Kamil, R. Barr, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
3. Cambell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation of multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
4. Chabot, R. J., Miller, T. J., & Juola, J. F. (1976). The relationship between repetition and depth of processing. Memory & Cognition, 4, 677-682.
5. Chabot, R. J., Petros, T. V., & McCord, G. (1983). Developmental and reading ability differences in accessing information from semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 128-142.
6. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 561-584.
7. Frederiksen, J. R., & Warren, B. M. (1987). A cognitive framework for developing expertise in reading. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 15, 84-93.
9. Glenberg, A. M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (1987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 119-136.
10. Howell, D. C. (1992). Statistical methods for psychology. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
11. Jackson, M. D., & McClelland, J. L. (1979). Processing determinants of reading speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 151-181.
12. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228-238.
13. Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integrating model. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
14. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. E. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
15. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
16. Lorch, R. F., Balota, D. A., & Stamm, E. G. (1986). Locus of inhibition effects in the priming of lexical decisions: Pre-or post-lexical access? Memory & Cognition, 14, 95-103.
17. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1980). The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphorical reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 668-682.
18. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 76(1, Pt. 2), 26-40.
19. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Perfetti, C. A. (1988). Verbal efficiency in reading ability. In M. Daneman, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: advances in theory and practice (pp. 109-143). New York: Academic Press.
21. Perfetti, C. A., & Goldman, S. R. (1976). Discourse memory and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 33-42.
22. Perfetti, C. A., & Roth, S. F. (1981). Some of the interactive processes in reading and their role in reading skill. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 269-279). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. Royer, J. M., Abranovic, W. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1987). Using entering reading comprehension performance as a predictor of performance in college classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 19-26.
25. Royer, J. M., & Hambleton, R. K. (1983). Normative study of 50 reading comprehension passages that use the sentence verification technique. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
26. Royer, J. M., Hastings, C. N., & Hook, C. (1979). A sentence verification technique for measuring reading comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 355-363.
27. Royer, J. M., Lynch, D. J., Hambleton, R. K., & Bulgarelli, C. (1984). Using the sentence verification technique to assess the comprehension of technical text as a function of subject matter expertise. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 839-869.
28. Salthouse, T. A. (1994). The aging of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8, 535-543.
29. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual priming effects in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 12, 315-328.
30. Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
31. Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review, 10, 72-100.
32. Walczyk, J. J. (1993). Are general resource notions still viable in reading research? Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 127-135.
33. Walczyk, J. J. (1995). Testing a compensatory-encoding model. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 396-408.
34. Walczyk, J. J., & Raska, L. J. (1992). The relation between low- and high-level reading skills in children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 38-46.