Telecasts and recruiting in NCAA division I football: The impact of altered property rights

Journal of Sport Management

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 359-372

  Fizel, John L ^a   Bennett, Randall W ^b  

^a BEHREND COLLEGE   (United States)

^b GONZAGA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030519652     PISSN: 08884773     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jsm.10.4.359     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Fizel, J.L., & Bennett, R.W. (1989). The impact of college football telecasts on college football attendance. Social Science Quarterly. 70(4), 980-988.
2. Fleisher, III, A.A., Goff, B.L., Shughart, II, W.L., & Tollison, R.D. (1988). Crime or punishment? Enforcement of the NCAA football cartel. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 10(4), 433-451.
3. Greenspan, D. (1988). College football's biggest fumble: The economic impact of the Supreme Court's decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma. The Antitrust Bulletin, 33(1), 1-65.
4. Gujarati, D.N. (1995). Basic econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Koch, J.V. (1986). Intercollegiate athletics association. In W. Adams (Ed.), Structure of American industry (pp.325-346). New York: MacMillan.
6. National Collegiate Athletic Association. (1981). 1980 NCAA television committee report. Shawnee Mission, KS: Author.
7. National Collegiate Athletic Association. (1982). Various issues 1981-1992. NCAA football. Overland Park, KS: Author.
8. Stelzer, Irwin M. (1986). Selected antitrust cases: Landmark decisions. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
9. Televised College Football. 98th Cong., 2d Sess. (1984). (Hearings held July 31, 1984, Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations).