What is wrong with 'Variable Sociology'?

European Sociological Review

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 159-166

  Esser, Hartmut ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030517512     PISSN: 02667215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018183     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Boudon, R. (1981) The Logic of Social Action. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
2. Diekmann, A. and Mitter, P. (1984) A comparison of the 'sickle function' with alternative stochastic models of divorce rates. In Diekmann, A. and Mitter, P. (eds.) Stochastic Modelling of Social Processes. Orlando, Academic Press, pp. 123-53.
3. Durkheim, E. (1966) The Rules of the Sociological Method. New York, The Free Press.
4. Giddens, A. (1976) New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. London, Hutchinson, pp. 155-62.
5. Granovetter, M. (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1420-43.
6. Schnell, R. und Kohler, U. (1995) Empirische Untersuchung einer Individualisierungs hypothese am Beispiel der Parteipräferenz von 1953-1992, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 4, 634-57.