The role of data and theory in covariation assessment: Implications for the theory-ladenness of observation

Journal of Mind and Behavior

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 321-344

  Freedman, Eric G ^a   Smith, Laurence D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; OBSERVATION; PERSONALITY; REVIEW; THEORY;

EID: 0030513219     PISSN: 02710137     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Alloy, L.B., and Tabachnik, N. (1984). Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychological Review, 91, 112-149.
2. Anderson, C A. (1983). Abstract and concrete data in the theory perseverance of social beliefs: When weak data lead to unshakable beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 93-108.
3. Anderson, C.A., Lepper, M.R., and Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037-1049.
4. Anderson, J.R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
5. Anscombe, F.J. (1973). Graphs in statistical analysis American Statistician, 27, 17-21.
6. Arkes, H.R., and Harkness, A.R. (1983). Estimates of contingency between two dichotomous variables. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 117-135.
7. Bechtel, W. (1988). Philosophy of science. An overview for cognitive science. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
8. Berman, J., and Kenny, D.A. (1976). Correlational bias in observer ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 263-273.
9. Beyth-Marom, R. (1982). Perception of correlation reexamined. Memory and Cognition, 10, 511-519.
10. Billman, D., Bornstein, B., and Richards, J. (1992). Effects of expectancy on assessing covariation in data: "Prior belief" versus "meaning." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proceses, 53, 74-88.
11. Bobko, P., and Karren, R. (1979). The perception of Pearson product moment correlations from bivariate scatterplots. Personnel Psychology, 32, 313-325.
12. Borkenau, P. (1986), Toward an understanding of trait interrelations: Acts as instances for several traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 371-381.
13. Brewer, W.F., and Samarapungavan, A. (1991). Children's theories vs. scientific theories: Differences in reasoning or differences in knowledge? In R.R. Huffman and D.S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives (pp. 209-232). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
14. Brown, H.I. (1977). Perception, theory and commitment: The new philosophy of science Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Brush, S.G. (1974) Should the history of science be rated X? Science, 183, 1164-1172.
16. Carnap, R. (1969). The logical structure of the world [Rolf A. George, Trans.]. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1928)
17. Chapman, L.J., and Chapman, J.P. (1969). Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 271-280.
18. Churchland, P.M. (1989a). The neurocomputational perspective: The nature of the mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
19. Churchland, P.M. (1989b). On the nature of theories: A neurocomputational perspective. In C.W. Savage (Ed.), The nature of theories (volume 14). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20. Churchiand, P.M. (1992), A deeper unity: Some Feyerabendian themes in neurocomputational form. In R.N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 341-363). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
21. Clark, J.A., and Paivio, A. (1989). Observational and theoretical terms in psychology: A cognitive perspective on scientific language. American Psychologist, 44, 500-513
22. Cleveland, W.S. (1994). The elements of graphing data (revised edition). Summit, New Jersey: Hobart Press.
23. Cleveland, W.S., Diacoins, P., and McGill, R. (1982) Variables on scatterplots look more highly correlated when scales are increased. Science, 216, 1138-1141.
24. De Mey, M. (1980). The interaction between theory and data in science. In K.D. Knorr, R. Krohn, and R. Whitley (Eds.), Sociology of the sciences: Volume 4 The social process of scientific investigation (pp. 3-23). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
25. De Mey, M. (1981). The cognitive paradigm. Boston: Reidel.
26. Donovan, A., Laudan, L., and Laudan, R. (Eds.). (1988). Scrutinizing science.: Empirical studies of scientific change. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
27. Ebbesen, E.B., and Allen, R.B. (1979). Cognitive processes in implicit personality trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 471-488.
28. Erlick, D.E. (1966). Human estimates of statistical relatedness. Psychonomic Science, 5, 365-366.
29. Erlick, D.E., and Mills, R. (1967). Perceptual quantification of conditional dependency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 9-14.
30. Faust, D. (1984). The limits of scientific reasoning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
31. Feigl, H. (1970). The "orthodox" view of theories. In M. Radner and S. Winokur (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (volume 4, pp. 3-16). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32. Fodor, J.A. (1984). Observation reconsidered. Philosophy of Science, 51, 23-43.
33. Freedman, E.G., and Smith, L.D. (1985). Implications from cognitive psychology for the philosophy of science. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, California.
34. Fuller, S. (1988). Social epistemology. Bloomington; Indiana University Press.
35. Gholson, B., Freedrnan, E.G., and Houts, A.C. (1989). Cognitive psychology of science: An introduction. In B. Gholson, W.R. Shadish, R.A. Neimeyer, and A.C. Houts (Eds.), Psychology of science. Contributions to metascience (pp. 267-274). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Giere, R.N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Giere, R.N. (1994). The cognitive structure of scientific theories. Philosophy of Science, 61, 276-296.
38. Goldman, A.I. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
39. Gorman, M.E. (1992). Simulating science: Heuristics, mental models, and technoscientific thinking. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
40. Grandy, R.E. (1992). Information, observation and measurement from the viewpoint of a cognitive philosophy of science. In R.N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 187-206). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
41. Greenwald, A.G., Pratkanis, A.R., Leippe, M.R., and Baumgardner, M.H. (1986). Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psychological Review, 93, 216-229.
42. Hanson, N.R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Hanson, N.R. (1970). A picture theory of theory meaning. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), The nature and function of scientific theories (pp. 233-274). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
44. Holland, J., Holyoak, K.J., Nisbett, R.E., and Thagard, P. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning and discovery. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
45. Jenkins, H.M., and Ward, W.C. (1965). Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 79, (1, Whole No. 594).
46. Jennings, D.L., Amabile, T., and Ross, L. (1982). Informal covariation assessment: Data-based versus theory-based judgments. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 211-230). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
47. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
48. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Lane, D.M., Anderson, C.A., and Kellam, K.L. (1985). Judging the relatedness of variables: The psychophysics of covariation detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 640-649.
50. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51. Lord, C.G., Ross, L., and Lepper, M.R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequent evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2110.
52. Mahoney, M.J. (1976). Scientist as subject: The psychological imperative. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger.
53. Mahoney, M.J., and DeMonbreun, B.G. (1978). Psychology of the scientist: An analysis of problem-solving bias. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 229-238.
54. McArthur, L.Z. (1980). Illusory causation and illusory correlation: Two epistemological accounts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 507-519.
55. McArthur, L.Z., and Baron, R.M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
56. McClelland, J.L., and Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive model of context effects in letter perception: L An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
57. Mitroff, I. (1974). The subjective side of science. New York: Elsevier.
58. Neimeyer, R.A., Shadish, W.R., Freedman, E.G., Gholson, B., and Houts, A.C. (1989). A preliminary research agenda for the psychology of science. In B. Gholson, W.R. Shadish, R.A. Neimeyer, and A.C. Houts. (Eds.), Psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 429-448). New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Nisbett, R.E., and Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
60. Palmer, S.E. (1978). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In L. Gregg (Ed.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
61. Peterson, C.R. (1980). Recognition of noncontingency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 727-734.
62. Scheffler, I. (1982). Science and subjectivity (second edition). Indianapolis: Hackett.
63. Schneider, D.J. (1973). Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 294-309.
64. Schneider, W., and Shifirrin, R.M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
65. Shadish, W.R., and Fuller, S. (Eds.). (1994). The social psychology of science. New York: Guilford Press.
66. Shaklee, H., and Mims, M. (1982). Sources of error in judging event covariation; Effects of memory demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 206-224.
67. Smedslund, J. (1963). The concept of correlation in adults. Scandanavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 165-173.
68. Smith, E.E., Shoben, E.J., and Rips, L.J. (1974). Structure and processes in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 81, 214-241.
69. Solomon, M. (1992). Scientific rationality and human reasoning. Philosophy of Science, 59, 439-455.
70. SPSS, Inc. (1983). SPSS-X Users' Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill.
71. Trolier, T.K., and Hamilton, D.L. (1986). Variables influencing judgments of correlational relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 879-888.
72. Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
73. Tweney, R.D., Doherty, M.E., Worner, W.J., Pliske, D.B., Mynatt, C.R., Gross, K.A., and Arkkelin, D.L. (1980). Strategies of rule discovery in an inference task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 109-123.
74. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 214-241.
75. Ward, W.C., and Jenkins, H.M. (1965). The display of information and the judgment of contingency. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 19, 231-241.
76. Weckert, J. (1986). The theory-ladenness of observations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 17, 115-127.
77. Wright, J.C., and Murphy, G.L. (1984). The utility of theories in intuitive statistics: The robustness of theory-based judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 301-322.