Soil heterogeneity and root distribution of mature loblolly pine stands in Piedmont soils

Soil Science Society of America Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 1920-1925

  Parker, M M ^a   Van Lear, D H ^b  

^a TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 0030513080     PISSN: 03615995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000060043x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson, J.L., and J. Bouma. 1976. Water movement in pedal soils: I. Saturated flow. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 41:413-418.
2. Carmean, W.H. 1975. Forest site quality estimation in the United States. Adv. Agron. 27:209-269.
3. Coile, T.S. 1936. Distribution of forest tree roots in North Carolina Piedmont soils. J. For. 35:247-257.
4. Copeland, O.L., Jr. 1952. Root mortality of shortleaf and loblolly pine in relation to soils and littleleaf disease. J. For. 50:21-25.
5. Day, P.R. 1965. Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis, p. 545-556. In C.A. Black et al. (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA, Madison, WI.
6. Environmental Systems Research Institute. 1991. ARC-INFO, Version 6.1. Environmental Systems Res. Inst., Redlands, CA.
7. Foil, R.R., and C.W. Ralston. 1967. The establishment and growth of loblolly pine seedlings in compacted soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31:565-568.
8. Harris, W.F., R.S. Kinerson, and N.T. Edwards. 1977. Comparison of below-ground biomass of natural deciduous forests and toblolly pine plantations. Pedobiologia 17:369-381.
9. Hewlett, I.D. 1961. Soil moisture as a source of base flow from steep mountain watersheds. USDA-Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Stn. Paper 132. Coweeta Hydrologic Lab., Otto, NC.
10. Jones, S.M. 1991. Landscape ecosystem classification for South Carolina, p. 59-68. In D.L. Mengel and D.T. Tew (ed.) Proc. Symp. on Ecological Landscape Classification: Applications to Identify Productive Potential of Southern Forests. Charlotte, NC. 7-9 Jan. 1991. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-68. USDA For. Serv., SE Forest Exp. Stn., Ashville, NC.
11. Kapeluck, P.R., and D.H. Van Lear. 1995. A technique for estimating below-stump biomass of mature loblolly pine plantations. Can. J. For. Res. 25:361-365.
12. Keyes, M.R., and C.C. Grier. 1981. Above- and below-ground net production in 40-year-old Douglas Fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Can. J. For Res. 11:599-605.
13. Kochenderfer, J.N. 1973. Root distribution under some forest types native to West Virginia. Ecology 54:445-448.
14. Lutz, H.J., and R.F. Chandler, Jr. 1955. Forest soils. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
15. Pehl, C.E., C.L. Tuttle, J.N. Houser, and D.M. Moehring. 1984. Total biomass and nutrients of 25-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). For. Ecol. Manage. 9:155-160.
16. Quisenberry, V.L., B.R. Smith, R.E. Phillips, H.D. Scott, and S. Nortcliff. 1993. A soil classification system for describing water and chemical transport. Soil Sci. 156:306-315.
17. Rogers, W.S., and G.C. Head. 1969. Factors affecting the distribution and growth of roots of perennial woody species. In W. J. Whittington (ed.) Root growth. Butterworths, London.
18. Safford, L.O., and S. Bell. 1972. Biomass of fine roots in a white spruce plantation. Can. J. For. Res. 2:169-172.
19. SAS Institute. 1985. SAS user's guide. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC. Schoenike, R.E., G.D. Kessler, and W.T. Ahern. 1975 The natural ranges of pine (Pinus spp.) species in South Carolina. Dep. of Forestry Technical Paper No. 3, Clemson Univ. Clemson, SC.
20. Shelton, M.G. 1984. Effects of the initial spacing of loblolly pine plantations on production and nutrition during the first 25 years. Ph.D. Diss. Mississippi State University, Starkville.
21. Trimble, S.W. 1974. Man-induced soil erosion on the southern Piedmont, 1700-1970. Soil Conserv. Soc. Am., Ankeny, IA
22. Van Lear, D.H. 1991. History of site classification in the South, p. 25-36. In D.L. Mengel and D.T. Tew (ed.) Ecological land classification: Applications to identify the productive potential of southern forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-68, USDA, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Exp. Stn., Asheville, NC.
23. Van Lear, D.H., J.E. Douglass, S.K. Cox, and M.K. Augspurger. 1985. Sediment and nutrient export in runoff from burned and harvested loblolly pine watersheds in the South Carolina Piedmont. J. Environ. Qual. 14:169-174.
24. Van Lear, D.H., and P.R. Kapeluck. 1995. Above- and below-stump biomass and nutrient content of a mature loblolly pine plantation. Can. J. For. Res. 25:366-371.
25. Van Lear, D.H., P.R. Kapeluck, and M.M. Parker. 1995. Distribution of carbon in a Piedmont soil as affected by loblolly pine management, p. 489-501. In W.W. McFee and J.M. Kelly (ed.) Proc. 8th North American Forest Soils Conf., Gainesville, FL. 9-13 May 1993. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
26. Van Rees, K.C. J. 1984. Root distribution of a slash pine plantation on a flatwoods spodosol. M.S. Thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville.
27. Waring, R.H., and W.H. Schlesinger. 1985. Forest ecosystems - Concepts and management. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL.
28. Wells, C.G., and J.R. Jorgensen. 1975. Nutrient cycling in loblolly pine plantations, p. 137-158. In B. Bernier and C H. Winget (ed.) Forest soils and land management. Proc. 4th North American Forest Soils Conf., Quebec. August 1973. Laval University, Quebec.