Physiology of carbon allocation in trees

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 11, Issue 2-3, 1996, Pages 115-127

  Ericsson, Tom ^a   Rytter, Lars ^a   Vapaavuori, Elina ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide; light intensity; mineral nutrients; plant water status; root; shoot ratio; soil acidity; soil texture; temperature

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; GROWTH KINETICS; METABOLISM; MINERALS; NUTRITION; OZONE; PH; PHYSIOLOGY; SOILS; TEXTURES;

CARBON ALLOCATION; PLANT GROWTH; SOIL ACIDITY; SOIL TEXTURE; TREES;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

EID: 0030512348     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0961-9534(96)00032-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (141)

1. 1. C. D. Elmore, The paradox of no correlation between leaf photosynthetic rate and crop yields. In Predicting Photosynthesis for Ecosystem Models (J. D. Hesketh and J. W. Jones, Eds), Vol. 2, pp. 155-167 (1980).
2. 2. A. J. S. McDonald, A summary criticism of photosynthetic studies and stem wood production. In Ecology and Management of Forest Biomass Production Systems (K. Perttu, Ed.), pp. 167-178. Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci., Dept. Ecol. Environ. Res., Rep. 15, Uppsala (1984).
3. 3. R. M. Gifford and L. T. Evans, Photosynthesis, carbon partitioning, and yield. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 32, 485-509 (1981).
4. 4. R. M. Gifford, J. H. Thorne, W. D. Hitz and R. T. Giaquinta, Crop productivity and photoassimilate partitioning. Science 225, 801-809 (1984).
5. 5. J. L. Monteith, Climate and efficiency of crop production in Britain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 281, 277-294 (1977).
6. 6. S. Linder, Potential and actual production in Australian forest stands. In Research for Forest Management (J. J. Landsberg and W. Parsons, Eds.), pp. 11-35. CSIRO, Melbourne (1985).
7. 7. M. G. R. Cannell, L. J. Sheppard and R. Milne, Light use efficiency and woody biomass production of poplar and willow. Forestry 61, 125-136 (1988).
8. 8. A. J. Bloom, F. S. Chapin III and H. A. Mooney, Resource limitation in plants - an economic analogy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 363-392 (1985).
9. 9. R. Hunt and P. S. Lloyd, Growth and partitioning. New Phytol. 106, 235-249 (1987).
10. 10. F. W. Snyder and G. E. Carlson, Selecting for partitioning of photosynthetic products in crops. Adv. Agron. 37, 47-72 (1987).
11. 11. J. B. Wilson, A review of evidence on the control of shoot:root ratio, in relation to models. Ann. Bot. 61, 433-449 (1988).
12. 12. R. E. Dickson, Carbon and nitrogen allocation in trees. Ann. Sci. For. 46 (Supl.), 631-647 (1989).
13. 13. R. E. Dickson, Assimilate distribution and storage. In Physiology of Trees (A. S. Raghavendra, Ed.), pp. 51-85. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1991).
14. 14. R. E. Dickson and J. G. Isebrands, Leaves as regulators of stress response. In Response of Plants to Multiple Stresses (H. A. Mooney, W. E. Winner and E. J. Pell, Eds), pp. 3-34. Academic Press, San Diego, CA (1991).
15. 15. R. J. Luxmoore, A source-sink framework for coupling water, carbon, and nutrient dynamics of vegetation. Tree Physiol. 9, 267-280 (1991).
16. 16. G. I. Ågren and F. Wikström, Modelling carbon allocation - a review. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 23, 343-353 (1993).
17. 17. T. Ericsson, Growth and shoot:root ratio of seedlings in relation to nutrient availability. Plant and Soil 168-169, 205-214 (1995).
18. 18. R. J. Luxmoore, R. Oren, D. W. Sheriff and R. B. Thomas, Source-sink-storage relationships of conifers. In Resource Physiology of Conifers (W. K. Smith and T. M. Hinckley, Eds), Acad. Press, San Diego, CA (1994).
19. 19. R. Brouwer, Nutritive influences on the distribution of dry matter in the plant. Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 10, 399-408 (1962).
20. 20. J. F. Reynolds and J. H. M. Thornley, A shoot:root partitioning model. Ann. Bot. 49, 585-597 (1982).
21. 21. R. C. Dewar, A root-shoot partitioning model based on carbon-nitrogen-water interactions and Münch phloem flow. Functional Ecol. 7, 356-369 (1993).
22. 22. T. Ericsson and M. Kähr, Growth and nutrition of birch seedlings in relation to potassium supply rate. Trees 7, 78-85 (1993).
23. 23. T. Ericsson and M. Kähr, Growth and nutrition of birch seedlings at varied relative addition rates of magnesium. Tree Physiol. 15, 85-93 (1995).
24. 24. A. Göransson, Growth and nutrition of small Betula pendula plants at different relative addition rates of manganese. Tree Physiol. 14, 375-388 (1994).
25. 25. S. Linder and D. A. Rook, Effects of mineral nutrition on carbon dioxide exchange and partitioning of carbon in trees. In Nutrition of Plantation Forests (G. D. Bowen and E. K. S Nambiar, Eds.), pp. 211-236. Academic Press, London (1984).
26. 26. H. Lambers, Growth, respiration, exudation and symbiotic associations: the fate of carbon translocated to the roots. In Root Development and Function (P. J. Gregory, J. V. Lake and D. A. Rose, Eds), pp. 125-145. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987).
27. 27. K. J. Nadelhoffer and J. W. Raich, Fine root production estimates and belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Ecology 73, 1139-1147 (1992).
28. 28. D. I. Dickmann and K. S. Pregitzer, The structure and dynamics of woody plant root systems. In Ecophysiology of Short Rotation Forest Crops (C. P. Mitchell, J. B. Ford-Robertson, T. Hinckley and L. Sennerby-Forsse, Eds), pp. 95-123. Elsevier Applied Science, London (1992).
29. 29. W. Böhm, Methods of Studying Root Systems. Ecol. Studies 33, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (1979).
30. 30. H. M. Taylor, D. R. Upchurch and B. L. McMichael, Applications and limitations of rhizotrons and minirhizotrons for root studies. Plant Soil 129, 29-35 (1990).
31. 31. R. L. Hendrick and K. S. Pregitzer, The demography of fine roots in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 73, 1094-1104 (1992).
32. 32. R.-M. Rytter and A.-C. Hansson, Seasonal amount, growth and depth distribution of fine roots in an irrigated and fertilized Salix viminalis L. plantation. Biomass and Bioenergy, in press (1996).
33. 33. K. J. Nadelhoffer, J. D. Aber and J. M. Melillo, Fine roots, net primary production, and soil nitrogen availability: a new hypothesis. Ecology 66, 1377-1390 (1985).
34. 34. T. J. Fahey and J. W. Hughes, Fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. J. Ecol. 82, 533-548 (1994).
35. 35. A. W. Schoettle and T. J. Fahey, Foliage and fine root longevity of pines. Ecol. Bull. 43, 136-153 (1994).
36. 36. T. Ingestad, A definition of optimum nutrient requirements in birch seedlings II. Physiol. Plant. 24, 118-125 (1971).
37. 37. T. Ingestad, Nitrogen stress in birch seedlings. II. N, K, P, Ca, and Mg nutrition. Physiol. Plant. 45, 149-157 (1979).
38. 38. S. Linder, Responses to water and nutrients in coniferous ecosystems. Ecol. Studies 61, 180-202. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg (1987).
39. 39. A. J. S. McDonald, Nitrate availability and shoot area development in small willow (Salix viminalis). Plant Cell Environ. 12, 417-424 (1989).
40. 40. E. D. Ford, The dynamics of plantation growth. In Nutrition of Plantation Forests (G. D. Bowen and E. K. S Nambiar, Eds.), pp. 17-52. Academic Press, London (1984).
41. 41. A. J. S. McDonald, T. Lohammar and T. Ingestad, Net assimilation rate and shoot area development in birch (Betula pendula Roth.) at different steady-state values of nutrition and photon flux density. Trees 6, 1-6 (1992).
42. 42. D. B. Shank, Effects of phosphorus, nitrogen and soil moisture on top-root ratios of inbred and hybrid maize. J. Agric. Res. 70, 365-377 (1945).
43. 43. J. H. M. Thornley, A balanced quantitative model for root:shoot ratios in vegetative plants. Ann. Bot. 36, 431-441 (1972).
44. 44. A. Göransson, Growth and nutrition of small Betula pendula plants at different relative addition rates of iron. Trees 8, 32-38 (1993).
45. 45. J. Willenbrink, Über Bezieungen zwischen Proteinumsatz und Schwefelversorgung der Chloroplasten. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 56, 427-438 (1967).
46. 46. A. J. S. McDonald, A. Ericsson and T. Lohammar, Dependence of starch storage on nutrient availability and photon flux density in small birch (Betula pendula Roth.). Plant Cell Environ. 9, 433-438 (1986).
47. 47. B. Thorsteinsson and J.-E. Tillberg, Carbohydrate partitioning and growth in Lemna gibba L. G3. II The effect of phosphorus limitation. Plant Physiol. 71, 271-276 (1987).
48. 48. T. Ericsson and T. Ingestad, Nutrition and growth of birch seedlings at varied relative phosphorus addition rates. Physiol. Plant. 72, 227-235 (1988).
49. 49. B. Thorsteinsson, E. Tillberg and T. Ericsson, Levels of IAA, ABA and carbohydrates in source and sink leaves of Betula pendula Roth. Scand. J. For. Res. 5, 347-354 (1990).
50. 50. H. D. Cooper and D. T. Clarkson, Cycling of amino-nitrogen and other nutrients between shoots and roots in cereals - a possible mechanism intergrating shoot and root in the regulation of nutrient uptake. J. Exp. Bot. 40, 753-762 (1989).
51. 51. W. D. Jeschke, C. A. Atkins and J. S. Pate, Ion circulation via phloem and xylem between root and shoot of nodulated white lupin. J. Plant Physiol. 117, 319-330 (1985).
52. 52. H. Lambers, R. J. Simpson, V. C. Beilharz and M. J. Dalling, Growth and translocation of C and N in wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown with a split root system. Physiol. Plant. 56, 421-429 (1982).
53. 53. M. Mattsson, Nitrate assimilation in barley: effects of nitrogen limitation, ontogeny and genotype. Dissertation, Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci., Dept. Crop Genetics and Breeding, 56 pp., Svalöv, Sweden (1992).
54. 54. R. J. Simpson, H. Lambers and M. J. Dalling, Translocation of nitrogen in vegetative wheat plant (Triticum aestivum). Physiol. Plant. 56, 11-17 (1982).
55. 55. R. E. Dickson, Carbon fixation and distribution in young Populus trees. In Crown and Canopy Structure in Relation to Productivity (T. Fujimori and D. Whitehead, Eds), pp. 409-426. Forestry and For. Res. Inst., Ibaraki, Japan (1986).
56. 56. O. Björkman, Responses to different quantum flux densities. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology (O. L. Lange, P. S. Nobel, C. B. Osmond and H. Ziegler, Eds), pp. 57-107. New Series Vol. 12A, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1981).
57. 57. W. J. Corré, Growth and morphogenesis of sun and shade plants. I. The influence of light intensity. Acta Bot. Neerl. 32, 49-62 (1983).
58. 58. T. Ingestad and A. J. S. McDonald, Interaction between nitrogen and photon flux density in birch seedlings at steady-state nutrition. Physiol. Plant. 77, 1-11 (1989).
59. 59. E. Van Volkenburg and R. E. Cleland, Separation of cell enlargement and division in bean leaves. Planta 146, 245-247 (1979).
60. 60. H. Smith and G. Whitelam, Phytochrome, a family of photoreceptors with multiple physiological roles. Plant Cell Environ. 13, 695-707 (1990).
61. 61. J. P. Bryant, F. S. Chapin III and D. R. Klein, Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40, 357-368 (1983).
62. 62. R. H. Waring, A. J. S. McDonald, S. Larsson, T. Ericsson, A. Wirén, E. Arwidsson, A. Ericsson and T. Lohammar, Differences in chemical composition of plants grown at constant relative growth rates with stable mineral nutrition. Oecologia 66, 157-160 (1985).
63. 63. R. Pettersson and A. J. S. McDonald, Effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentration on photosynthesis and growth of small birch plants (Betula pendula Roth.) at optimal nutrition. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 911-919 (1992).
64. 2 and nitrogen supply. Plant Cell Environ. 16, 1115-1121 (1993).
65. 65. M. H. Unsworth and D. P. Ormrod (Eds), Effects of Gaseous Air Pollution in Agriculture and Horticulture. Butterworth Scientific, London (1982).
66. 66. M. J. Koziol and F. R. Whatley (Eds), Gaseous Air Pollutants and Plant Metabolism. Butterworth, London (1984).
67. 67. M. Treshow (Ed.), Air Pollution and Plant Life. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1984).
68. 68. R. L. Heath, Initial events in injury to plants by air pollutants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31, 395-431 (1980).
69. 2 exposure causes a linear decline in soybean yield. Environ. Pollut. 34, 345-355 (1984).
70. 70. D. R. Cooley and W. J. Manning, The impact of ozone on assimilate partitioning in plants: a review. Environ. Pollut. 47, 95-113 (1987).
71. 71. S. Meier, L. F. Grand, M. M. Schoeneberger, R. A. Reinert and R. I. Bruck, Growth, ectomycorrhizae and nonstructural carbohydrates of loblolly pine seedlings exposed to ozone and soil water deficit. Environ. Pollut. 64, 11-27 (1990).
72. 72. H. A. Constantinidou and T. T. Kozlowski, Effects of sulfur dioxide and ozone on Ulmus americana seedlings. II Carbohydrates, proteins and lipids. Can. J. Bot. 57, 176-184 (1979).
73. 73. P. B. Reich, A. W. Schoettle, H. F. Stroo and R. G. Amundsen, Acid rain and ozone influence mycorrhizal infection in tree seedlings. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 36, 724-726 (1986).
74. 74. A. Fangmeier, A. Hadwiger-Fangmeier, L. Van der Eerden and H.-J. Jäger, Effects of atmospheric ammonia on vegetation - a review. Environ. Pollut. 86, 43-82 (1994).
75. 75. L. W. A. Van Hove, E. H. Adema and W. J. Vredenberg, The uptake of atmospheric ammonia by leaves. In Air Pollution and Ecosystems (P. Mathy, Ed.), pp. 734-742. Reidel, Dordrecht (1987).
76. 76. B.-G. Encke, Stickstoff und Waldsterbe. Allg. Forst Zeitschr. 41, 922-923 (1986).
77. 77. L. J. M. Van der Eerden, M. Pérez-Soba and T. A. Dueck, Responses of Pinus sylvestris to atmospheric ammonia. In Proc. Int. Congr. on Forest Decline Research, Friedrichshafen, Germany, Oct. 1989, Poster Summary (1990).
78. 78. L. J. M. Van der Eerden and M. Pérez-Soba, Physiological responses of Pinus sylvestris to atmospheric ammonia. Trees 6, 48-53 (1992).
79. 79. O. A. M. Lewis, B. Fulton and A. A. A. von Zelewski, Differential distribution of carbon in response to nitrate, ammonium, and nitrate + ammonium nutrition in wheat. In Inorganic Nitrogen Metabolism (W. R. Ullrich, P. J. Aparicio, P. J. Syrett and F. Castillo, Eds), pp. 240-246, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1987).
80. 80. L. J. M. Van der Eerden, L. J. A. Lekkerkerk, S. M. Smeulders and A. E. Jansen, Effects of atmospheric ammonia and ammonium sulphate on Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Environ. Pollut. 76, 1-9 (1992).
81. 81. G. Hofmann and D. Heinsdorf, Zur landschaftsökologischen Wirkung von Stickstoff-Emissionen aus Tierproduktionanlagen, insbesondere auf Waldbestände. Tierzucht 44, 500-504 (1990).
82. 82. W. J. Davies and J. Zhang, Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 55-76 (1991).
83. 83. T. F. Neales, A. Masia, J. Zhang and W. J. Davies, The effects of partially drying part of the root system of Helianthus annuus on the abscisic acid content of the roots, xylem sap and leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 40, 1113-1120 (1989).
84. 84. D. J. Gowing, W. J. Davies and H. G. Jones, A positive root-sourced signal as an indicator of soil drying in apple, Malus x domestica Borkh., J. Exp. Bot. 41, 1535-1540 (1990).
85. 85. G. D. Bowen, Roots as a component of tree productivity. In Attributes of Trees as Crop Plants (M. G. R. Cannell and J. E. Jackson, Eds), pp. 303-315 (1985).
86. 86. J. Zhang and W. J. Davies, Abscisic acid produced in dehydrating roots may enable the plant to measure the water status of the soil. Plant Cell Environ. 12, 73-81 (1989).
87. 87. R. Munns and R. W. King, Abscisic acid is not the only stomatal inhibitor in the transpiration stream. Plant Physiol. 88, 703-708 (1988).
88. 88. D. W. Lawlor, The effects of water deficit on photosynthesis. In Environment and Plant Metabolism. Flexibility and Acclimation (N. Smirnoff, Ed.), pp. 129-160. Bios Scientific, Oxford (1995).
89. 89. E.-D. Schulze and F. S. Chapin III, Plant specialization to environments of different resource availabilities. In Potentials and Limitations of Ecosystem Analysis (E.-D. Schulze and H. Ziegler, Eds), pp. 120-148. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1987).
90. 90. H. L. Gholz, K. C. Ewel and R. O. Teskey, Water and forest productivity. For. Ecol. Mgmt 30, 1-18 (1990).
91. 91. T. C. Hsiao, Plant response to water stress. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 25, 519-570 (1973).
92. 14C translocates in sugarcane. Plant Physiol. 42, 338-346 (1967).
93. 14C translocation in corn (Zea mays L.). Plant Physiol. 52, 436-439 (1973).
94. 94. F. J. M. Sung and D. R. Krieg, Relative sensitivity of photosynthetic assimilation and translocation of 14 Carbon to water stress. Plant Physiol. 64, 852-856 (1979).
95. 95. J. E. Dale and J. F. Sutcliffe, Phloem transport. In Plant Physiology - a Treatise, Vol. 9: Water and Solutes in Plants (F. C. Steward, Ed.), pp. 455-549. Academic Press, New York (1986).
96. 96. M. H. Zimmermann and C. L. Brown, Trees: Structure and Function. 336 pp. Springer-Verlag, New York (1971).
97. 97. H. Lyr and G. Hoffmann, Growth rates and growth periodicity of tree roots. Int. Rev. For. Res. 2, 186-206 (1967).
98. 98. R. O. Teskey and T. M. Hinckley, Influence of temperature and water potential on root growth of white oak. Physiol. Plant. 52, 363-369 (1981).
99. 99. S. T. Gower, H. L. Gholz, K. Nakane and V. C. Baldwin, Production and carbon allocation patterns of pine forests. Ecol. Bull. 43, 115-135 (1994).
100. 100. R.-M. Rytter and L. Rytter, Seasonal growth patterns of fine roots and shoots in lysimeter-grown basket willows and grey alders. In Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. 'The Tree', 11-16 Sept. 1995, Montpellier, France, in press (1996).
101. 101. J. Deans and E. D. Ford, Seasonal patterns of radial root growth and starch dynamics in plantation-grown Sitka spruce trees in differing ages. Tree Physiol. 1, 241-251 (1986).
102. -. Plant Cell Environ. 9, 535-543 (1986).
103. 103. J. F. Farrar, Temperature and the partitioning and translocation of carbon. In Plants and Temperature (S. P. Long and F. I. Woodward, Eds), pp. 203-235. The Cambridge Company of Biologists (1988).
104. 104. D. T. Clarkson, M. J. Earnshaw, P. J. White and H, D. Cooper, Temperature dependent factors influencing nutrient uptake: an analysis of responses at different levels of organization. In Plants and Temperature (S. P. Long and F. I. Woodward, Eds), pp. 281-309. The Cambridge Company of Biologists (1988).
105. 105. D. J. C. Friend, The effect of light and temperature on the growth of cereals. In The Growth of Cereals and Grasses (F. L. Milthorpe and J. D. Ivins, Eds), pp. 181-199. Butterworth, London (1965).
106. 2 exchange rates in control and desert races of A triplex lentiformis. Oecologia 26, 245-255 (1976).
107. 107. D. R. Geiger and J. C. Servaites, Carbon allocation and response to stress. In Response of Plants to Multiple Stresses (H. A. Mooney, W. E. Winner and E. J. Pell, Eds), pp. 103-127. Academic Press, London (1991).
108. 108. R. M. Lanner, Temperature and the diurnal rhythm of height growth in pines. J. For. 62, 493-495 (1964).
109. 109. M. Kanninen, Studies in the shoot elongation in Scots pine: diurnal variations in relation to temperature. Univ. Helsinki, Dept. Silviculture, Res. Notes 50, pp. 1-69 (1984)
110. 110. M. Kanninen, Shoot elongation in Scots pine: diurnal variations and response of temperature. J. Exp. Bot. 36, 1760-1770 (1985).
111. 111. J. D. Deans, Fluctuations of the soil environment and fine root growth in a young Sitka spruce plantation. Plant Soil 52, 195-208 (1979).
112. 112. M. R. Kuhns, H. E. Garrett, R. O. Teskey and T. M. Hinckley, Root growth of black walnut trees related to soil temperature, soil water potential, and leaf water potential. For. Sci. 31, 617-629 (1985).
113. 113. R. K. Hermann, Growth and production of tree roots: a review. In The Belowground Ecosystem (J. K. Marshall, Ed.), pp. 7-27. Range Sci. Dept, Sci. Ser. 26, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO (1977).
114. 114. M. K. Burke and D. J. Raynal, Fine root growth phenology, production, and turnover in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Plant Soil 162, 135-146 (1994).
115. 115. M. R. Kaufmann, Soil temperature and drying cycle effects on water relations of Pinus radiatat. Can. J. Bot. 55, 2412-2418 (1977).
116. 116. W. Lopushinsky and M. R. Kaufmann, Effects of cold soil on water relations and spring growth of Douglas-fir seedlings. For. Sci. 30, 628-634 (1984).
117. 117. C. P, Andersen, E. I. Sucoff and R. K. Dixon, Effects of root zone temperature on root initiation and elongation in red pine seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 16, 666-670 (1986).
118. 118. W. Lopushinsky and T. A. Max, Effect of soil temperature on root and shoot growth and bud burst timing in conifer seedling transplants. New Forests 4, 107-124 (1990).
119. 119. E. H. DeLucia, Effect of low root temperature on net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and carbohydrate concentration in Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) seedlings. Tree Physiol. 2, 143-154 (1986).
120. 2 concentration in seedlings of Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry). Plant Cell Environ. 10, 333-338 (1987).
121. 121. E. H. DeLucia and W. K. Smith, Air and soil temperature limitations on photosynthesis in Engelmann spruce during summer. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 527-533 (1987).
122. 122. E. M. Vapaavuori, R. Rikala and A. Ryyppö, Effects of root temperature on growth and photosynthesis in conifer seedlings during shoot elongation. Tree Physiol. 10, 217-230 (1992).
123. 123. A. Ryyppö, E. M. Vapaavuori, R. Rikala and M.-L. Sutinen, Fatty acid composition of microsomal phospholipids and H + - ATPase activity in the roots of Scots pine seedlings grown at different root temperatures during flushing. J. Exp. Bot. 45, 1533-1539 (1994).
124. 124. C. Körner and W. Larcher, Plant life in cold climates. In Plants and Temperature (S. P. Long and F. I. Woodward, Eds), pp. 25-57. The Cambridge Company of Biologists (1988).
125. 125. T. Ingestad, A definition of optimum nutrient requirements in birch seedlings. III. Influence of pH and temperature of nutrient solution. Physiol. Plant. 46, 31-35 (1979).
126. 126. K. A. Santarius, Sites of heat sensitivity in chloroplasts and different inactivation of cyclic and noncyclic photophosphorylation by heating. J. Term. Biol. 1, 101-107 (1975).
127. 127. E. Weis and J. A. Berry, Plants and high temperature stress. In Plants and Temperature (S. P. Long and F. I. Woodward, Eds), pp. 329-346. The Cambridge Company of Biologists, (1988).
128. 128. M. M. Ludlow, Light stress at high temperature. In Photoinhibition (D. J. Kyle, C. B. Osmond and C. J. Arntzen. Eds), pp. 89-109. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1987).
129. 129. J. A. Berry and O. Björkman, Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31, 491-543 (1980).
130. 130. D. M. Rizzo and T. C. Harrington, Root movement and root damage of red spruce and balsam fir on subalpine sites in the White Mountains New Hampshire. Can. J. For. Res. 18, 991-1001 (1988).
131. 131. T. Ericsson and I. Lindsjö, The influence of pH on growth and nutrition of some energy forest tree species. Swed. Univ. Agric. Sci., Energy For. Proj., Tech., Rep. 11, 7 pp., Uppsala (in Swedish) (1981).
132. 132. M. P. Coutts, Factors affecting the direction of growth of tree roots. Ann. Sci. For. 46 (Suppl.), 277-287 (1989).
133. 133. D. M. Eissenstat and K. C. J. Van Rees, The growth and function of pine roots. Ecol. Bull. 43, 76-91 (1994).
134. 14C partitioning in cottonwood. Tree Physiol. 3, 157-171 (1987).
135. 14C)-Jabeled photosynthates within intensively cultured Populus clones during the establishment year. Physiol. Plant. 59, 9-18 (1983).
136. 136. N. D. Nelson and J. G. Isebrands, Late-season photosynthesis and photosynthate distribution in an intensively-cultured Populus nigra laurifolia clone. Photosynthetica 17, 537-549 (1983).
137. 137. C. C. Grier, K. A. Vogt, M. R. Keyes and R. L. Edmonds, Biomass distribution and above-and below-ground production in young and mature Abies amabilis zone ecosystems of the Washington Cascades. Can. J. For. Res. 11, 155-167 (1981).
138. 138. W. F. Harris, R. S. Kinerson and N. T. Edwards, Comparison of belowground biomass of natural deciduous forests and loblolly pine plantations. Pedobiologia 17, 369-381 (1977).
139. 139. H. G. Miller, Carbon nutrient interactions - the limitations to productivity. Tree Physiol. 2, 373-385 (1986).
140. 140. P. M. Wargo and M. E. Montgomery, Colonization by Armillaria mellea and Agrilus bilineatus of oaks injected with ethanol. For. Sci. 29, 848-857 (1983).
141. 141. R. A. Gregory, M. W. Williams Jr, B. L. Wong and G. J. Hawley, Proposed scenario for dieback and decline for Acer saccharum in northeastern U.S.A. and southeastern Canada.. IAWA Bull. 7, 357-369 (1986).