The case study as a jury research methodology

Journal of Criminal Justice

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 351-360

  Levine, James P ^a  

^a JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030511725     PISSN: 00472352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0047-2352(96)00016-5     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adler, S. (1994). The jury: Trial and error in the American courtroom. New York: Times Books.
2. Allison, G. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown.
3. Belknap, M. (1994). American political trials. Rev. and enl. Westport, CT: Praeger.
4. Bennett, W., and Feldman, M. (1981). Reconstructing reality in the courtroom: Justice and judgment in American culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
5. Blanck, P. (1987). The "process" of field research in the courtroom. Law and Human Behavior 11:337-58.
6. Blanck, P., Rosenthal, R., and Cordell, L. (1985). The appearance of justice: Judges' verbal and nonverbal behavior in criminal jury trials. Stanford Law Review 38:89-164.
7. Brams, S. (1980). Biblical games: A strategic analysis of stories in the Old Testament. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
8. Brill, S. (1989). Trial by jury. New York: American Lawyers Books/Touchstone.
9. Butler, P. (1995). Racially based jury nullification: Black power in the criminal justice system. Yale Law Journal 105:677-725.
10. Campbell, D. (1988). Qualitative knowing in action research. In Methodology and epistemology for the social sciences: Selected papers, ed. E. Samuel Overman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Campbell, D., and Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi experimental designs for research. New York: Rand McNally.
12. Ellsworth, P. (1993). Some steps between attitudes and verdicts. In Inside the juror: The psychology of juror decision making, ed. R. Hastie, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Festinger, L., Riecken, H., and Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails: A social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction of the world. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
14. Fletcher, G. (1988). A crime of self-defense: Bernhard Goetz and the law on trial. New York: Free Press.
15. Garrow, D. (1994). Liberty and sexuality: The right to privacy and the making of Roe v. Wade. New York: Macmillan.
16. Geis, G. (1991). The case study method in sociological criminology. In A case for the case study, eds. J. Feagin, A. Orum, and G. Sjoberg. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
17. Gerbasi, K., Zuckerman, M., and Reis, H. (1977). Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. Psychological Bulletin 84:323-45.
18. Gottlieb, M. (1995). Racial split at the end, as at the start. The New York Times, October 4, A1, A12.
19. Green G. (1995). The juror. New York: Warner Books.
20. Hagan F. (1993). Research methods in criminal justice and criminology. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillian.
21. Horowitz, I. (1985). The effects of jury nullification instructions on verdicts and jury functioning in criminal trials. Law and Human Behavior 9:25-36.
22. Horowitz, I. (1988). The impact of judicial instructions, argument, and challenges on jury decision making. Law and Human Behavior 12:439-53.
23. Jacobs, J. (1977). Stateville: The penitentiary in mass society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Kalven, H., and Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little Brown.
25. Klockars, C. (1974). The professional fence. New York: Free Press.
26. Kluger, R. (1976). Simple justice: The history of Brown v. Board of Education and black America's struggle for equality. New York: Knopf.
27. Lempert, R. (1991). Telling tales in court: Trial procedure and the story model. Cardozo Law Review 13:559-73.
28. Long, D. (1971). The trial of Dr. Spock. In Government lawlessness in America, eds. T. Becker and V. Murray. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Maxfield, M., and Babbie, E. (1995). Research methods in criminal justice and criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
30. Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. London: Oxford University Press.
31. Orum, A., Feagin, J., and Sjoberg, G. (1991). Introduction: The nature of the case study. In A case for the case study, eds. J. Feagin, A. Orum, and G. Sjoberg. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
32. Pennington, N., and Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision-making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14:521-33.
33. Rossi, P., and Freeman, G. (1993). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
34. Simon R. (1980). The jury: Its role in American society. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
35. Skolnick, J. (1966). Justice without trial: Law enforcement in democratic society. New York: John Wiley.
36. Sutherland, E. (1937). The professional thief. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Timothy, M. (1975). Jury woman: The story of the trial of Angela Y. Davis. San Francisco: Glide Publications.
38. Travis, L. (1983). The case study in criminal justice research: Applications to policy analysis. Criminal Justice Review 8:46-51.
39. Vidmar, N. (1995). Medical malpractice and the American jury: Confronting the myth about jury incompetence, deep pockets, and outrageous damage awards. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
40. Weiten, W., and Diamond, S. (1979). A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: The case of defendant characteristics. Law and Human Behavior 3:71-93.
41. Whyte, W. (1943). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Yin R. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Rev. ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
43. Yin, R., and Heald, K. (1981). Using the case survey to analyze policy studies. Administrative Science Quarterly 20:371-81.