How Initial Plans Mediate the Expansion and Resolution of Options in Writing

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 616-638

  Rau, Paul S ^a   Sebrechts, Marc M ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030507929     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755642     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aaronson, D., & Scarborough, H.S. (1977). Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative models. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 277-303.
2. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, S. (1987). Two models of composing processes. In The psychology of written composition (pp. 1-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Britton, J. (1980). Shaping at the point of utterance. In A. Freeman & I. Pringle (Eds.), Reinventing the rhetorical tradition (p. 61). Arkansas: L&S Books.
4. Burtis, P.J., Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M., & Tetroe, J. (1983). The development of planning in writing. In B.M. Kroll & G. Wells (Eds.), Explorations in the development of writing (p. 153). New York: Wiley.
5. Card, S., Robert, J., & Keenan, L. (1984). On-line composition of text. Proceedings of Intact 1984, 51-56. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.
6. Carey, L., Flower, L., Hayes, J., Shriver, K.A., & Haas, C. (1989). Differences in writers' initial task representations. (Tech. Rep. No. 34). Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Writing at University of California, Berkeley, and Carnegie Mellon University.
7. Collier, R.M. (1983). The word processor and revision strategies. College Composition and Communication, 34 (2), 149-155.
8. Daiute, C. (1986). Physical and cognitive factors in revising: Insights from studies with computers. Research in the Teaching of English, 4 (2), 141-159.
9. Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth-graders. National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL.
10. Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414.
11. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). The pregnant pause: An inquiry into the nature of planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 15 (8), 229-243.
13. Flower, L., Shriver, K.A., Carey, L., Haas, C., & Hayes, J. (1989). Planning in writing: The cognition of a constructive process (Tech. Rep. No. 35). Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Writing at University of California, Berkeley, and Carnegie Mellon University.
14. Galbraith, D. (1992). Conditions for discovery through writing. Instructional Science, 21, 45-72.
15. Gebhardt, R.C. (1982). Initial plans and spontaneous composition: Toward a comprehensive theory of the writing process. College English, 44, 620-627.
16. Gould, J.D. (1981). Composing letters with computer-based text editors. Human Factors, 23 (5), 593-606.
17. Haas, C., (1989a). Does the medium make a difference? Two studies of writing with pen and paper and with computers. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 149-169.
18. Haas, C. (1989b). How the writing medium shapes the writing process: Effects of word processing on planning. Research in the Teaching of English, 23 (2), 181-207.
19. Hawisher, G. (1987). The effects of word processing on the revision strategies of college freshman. Research in the Teaching of English, 21 (2), 145-159.
20. Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Kozma, R.B. (1991). The impact of computer-based tools and embedded prompts on writing processes and products of novice and advanced college writers. Cognition and Instruction, 8 (1), 1-27.
22. Lutz, J. (1987). A study of professional and experienced writers revising and editing at computer and with pen and paper. Research in the Teaching of English, 21 (4), 398-421.
23. Matsuhashi, A. (1987). Revising the plan and altering the text. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modeling production processes (pp. 197-223). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
24. Perl, D. (1979). The composing process of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317-336.
25. Robertson, S.P., & Black, J.B. (1983). Planning units in text editing behavior. Proceedings Computer-Human Interaction 1983, 217-221.
26. Rohman, D.G. (1965). Pre-writing: The stage of discovery in the writing process. College Composition and Communication, 16, 106-112.
27. Rosegrant, T. (1984). Fostering progress in literacy development: Technology and social interaction. Seminars in Speech and Language, 5 (1), 47-57.
28. Stallard, C.K. (1974). An analysis of the writing behavior of good student writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 8, 206-218.
29. Witte, S.P. (1987). Pre-text and composing. College Composition and Communication, 38 (4), 397-425.
30. Womble, G. (1985). Revising and computing. In J. Collins & E. Sommers (Eds.), Writing on-line (pp. 75-82). Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.