The power of randomization tests for single-case phase designs

Journal of Experimental Education

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 231-239

  Ferron, John ^a   Onghena, Patrick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030506764     PISSN: 00220973     EISSN: 19400683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1996.9943805     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bullís, M. & Anderson, G. (1986). Single-subject research methodology: An underutilized tool in the field of deafness. American Annals of the Deaf, 131, 344-348.
2. Busk, P. L., & Marascuilo, L. A. (1988). Autocorrelation in single-subject research: A counterargument to the myth of no autocorrelation. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 229-242.
3. Busk, P. L., & Marascuilo, L. A. (1992). Statistical analysis in single-case research: Issues, procedures, and recommendations, with applications to multiple behaviors. In T. R. Kratochwill & F. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp.159-185). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Carlson, P. E. (1985). Updating and broadening the use of single subject designs in reading. Reading Psychology, 6, 251-265.
5. Edgington, E. S. (1980a). Random assignment and statistical tests for one-subject experiments. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 19-28.
6. Edgington, E. S. (1980b). Validity of randomization tests for one-subject experiments. Journal of Educational Statistics, 5, 235-251.
7. Edgington, E. S. (1987). Randomization tests. New York: Marcel Dekker.
8. Edgington, E. S. (1992). Nonparametric tests for single-case experiments. In T. R. Kratochwill & F. R. Levin (Eds.). Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp.133-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Ferron, J. M., & Ware, W. B. (1995). Analyzing single-case data: The power of randomization tests. The Journal of Experimental Education. 63, 167-178.
10. Foster, W. (1986). The application of single subject research methods to the study of exceptional ability and extraordinary achievement. Gifted Child Quarterly. 30. 33-37.
11. Greenwood, K. M., & Matyas, T. A. (1990). Problems with the application of interrupted time series analysis for brief single-subject data. Behavioral Assessment. 12, 355-370.
12. Harrop, J. W., & Velicer, W. F. (1985). A comparison of alternative approaches to the analysis of interrupted time-series. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 27-44.
13. Huitema, B. E. (1986). Autocorrelation in behavioral research: Wherefore art thou? In A. Poling & W. R. Fuqua (Eds.), Research methods in applied behavioral analysis: Issues and advances (pp. 187-208). New York: Plenum Press.
14. Huitema, B. E. (1988). Autocorrelation: 10 years of confusion. Behavioral Assessment. 10, 253-294.
15. Huitema, B. E., & McKean, J. W. (1991). Autocorrelation estimation and inference with small samples. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 291-304.
16. Knapp, T. J. (1983). Behavior analysts' visual appraisal of behavior change in graphic display. Behavioral Assessment, 5, 155-164.
17. Marascuilo, L. A., & Busk, P. L. (1988). Combining statistics for multiple-baseline AB and replicated ABAB designs across subjects. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 1-28.
18. Matyas, T. A., & Greenwood, K. M. (1991). Problems in the estimation of autocorrelation in brief time series and some implications for behavioral data. Behavioral Assessment, 13, 137-157.
19. McCormick, S. (1990). A case for the use of single-subject methodology in reading research. Journal of Research in Reading, 13, 69-81.
20. Meulders, M. (1994). The statistical conclusion validity of randomization tests for AB single-case designs. Unpublished master's thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
21. Onghena, P. (1992). Randomization tests for extensions and variations of ABAB single-case experimental designs: A rejoinder. Behavioral Assessment, 14, 153-171.
22. Onghena, P. (1994). The power of randomization tests for single-case designs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
23. Onghena, P., & Edgington, E. S. (1994). Randomization tests for restricted alternating treatment designs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 783-786.
24. SAS Institute Inc. (1988). SAS/IML user's guide (Release 6.08) [Software manual]. Cary, NC: author.
25. SAS Institute Inc. (1994). SAS/IML (Release 6.04) [Computer program]. Cary, NC: author.
26. Sharpley, C. (1981). Time-series analysis of counseling research. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 14, 149-157.
27. Tawney, J. W., & Gast, D. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
28. Velicer, W. F., & Harrop, J. (1983). The reliability and accuracy of time series model identification. Educational Review, 7, 551-560.