Assessment of answers to questions about a text and knowledge of cognitive processes

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 313-328

  Meyer, Thierry ^a   Anis, Jacques ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030504097     PISSN: 02562928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf03172943     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Amalberti, R., Carbonnel, N., & Falzon, P. (1993). User's representations of computer systems in human-computer speech interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 547-566.
2. Anderson, R.C., & Pichert, J.W. (1978). Recall on previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 1-12.
3. Astington, J.W., Harris, P.L., & Olson, D. (Eds.) (1988). Developing theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bert-Erboul, A., Rouet, J.F., & Rossi, J.P. (1991). Langage et compréhension. In J.P. Rossi (Ed.), La recherche en psychologie: Domaines et méthodes (pp. 53-102). Paris: Dunod.
5. Butterworth, G.E., Harris, P.L., Leslie, A.M., & Wellman, H. (Eds.) (1991). Perspectives on the child's theory of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Caporael, L.R. (1981). The paralanguage of caregiving: Baby-talk to the institutionalized aged. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 876-884.
7. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization of physics problems by experts and by novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
8. Clarck, H.H., & Murphy, G.L. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference. In J.F. Le Ny & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 287-299). Amsterdam: North Holland.
9. Coirier, P., & Passerault, J.M. (1990). Expertise et stratégie dans le résumé de textes argumentatifs. L'Année Psychologique, 90, 359-380.
10. Colby, K.M., Hilf, F.D., Weber, S., & Kraemer, H.C. (1972). Turing-like indistinguability. Tests for the validation of a computer simulation of paranoids processes. Artificial Intelligence, 3, 199-222.
11. Denhière, G., & Baudet, S. (1992). Lecture, compréhension de textes et science cognitive. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
12. Falzon, P. (1990). Cooperatives dialogues. In J. Rasmussen, B. Brehmer, & J. Leplat (Eds.), Distributed decision making: Cognitive models for cooperative decision making (pp. 143-190). New York: John Wiley.
13. Farrimond, T. (1991). Machines, intelligence, and individuality. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 419-423.
14. Flavell, J.H. (1977). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Forgas, J.P. (1979). Social episodes: the study of interaction routines. London, New York: Academic Press.
16. Fussel, S.R., & Krauss, R.M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effect of speakers'assumptions about what other's know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 378-391.
17. Gopnick, R.M., & Astington, J.W. (1988). Children's understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance of reality. Child Development, 59, 26-37.
18. Graesser, A.C., & Kreuz, R.J. (1993). A theory of text generation during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 16, 145-160.
19. Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
20. Hinsz, V.B., & Tindale, R.S. (1992). Ambiguity and human versus technological sources of information in judgments involving base rate and individuating information. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 973-997.
21. Hogarth, R.M., & Einhorn, H.J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1-55.
22. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
23. Kennedy, A., Wilkes, A., Elder, L., & Murray, W.S. (1988). Dialogues with machines. Cognition, 30, 37-72.
24. Leslie, A. (1994). Pretending and believing: Issues in the theory of ToMM. Cognition, 50, 211-238.
25. Melot, A. (1993). Métacognition et théories de l'esprit. Journal International de Psychologie/International Journal of Psychology, 28, 581-593.
26. Meyer, T., & Anis, J. (1992). Comparer la machine à l'homme et l'homme à la machine: Approche expérimentale des représentations d'une génération automatique de récit. Langages, 106, 92-105.
27. Murphy G.L., & Medin, D.L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 292-316.
28. Noizet, G., & Caverni, J.-P. (1978). Psychologie de l'évaluation scolaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
29. Noordman, L.G.M., Vonk, W., & Kempff, H.J. (1992) Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 573-590.
30. Pereira, F.C.N., & Grosz, B.J. (1993). Introduction [special issue on natural language processing]. Artificial Intelligence, 63, 1-16.
31. Pitrat, J. (1985). Textes, ordinateurs et compréhension. Paris: Eyrolles.
32. Reder, L.M. (1987). Strategy selection in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 90-137.
33. Rimé, B. (1984). Langage et communication. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Psychologie sociale (pp. 415-446). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
34. Ross, L.D., Amabile, T. A., & Steinmetz, R.L. (1977). Social roles, social control and biaises in social perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485-494.
35. Salembier, P. (1991). Le Magicien d'Oz: Une technique de simulation et d'investigation des situations d'interaction avec un système "intelligent". In Y. Queinnec & F. Daniellou (Eds.), Designing for Everyone. Proceedings of the 11th congress of the International Ergonomics Association (pp. 552-554). London: Taylor & Francis.
36. Schwanz, N., Strack, F., Hilton, D.J., & Naderer, G. (1991). Base rates, representativeness and the logic of conversation: the contextual relevance of "irrelevant information". Social Cognition, 9, 67-84.
37. Schwartz, N., Strack, F., Hippler, H.J., & Bishop, G. (1991). The impact of administration mode on answer effects in survey measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 193-212.
38. Schwartz, N., & Südman, S. (1992). Context effects in social and psychological research. New York: Springer Verlag.
39. Searle, J. (1980). Mind, brains and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417-457.
40. Searle, J. (1990). Consciousness, explanatory inversion, and cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 585-642.
41. Springer, K. (1990). In defense of theories. Cognition, 25, 293-298.
42. Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K.A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 25, 401-421.
43. Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 433-460.
44. Wellman, H.M., & Gelman, S.A. (1992). Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337-375.
45. Wilkinson, L. (1990). SYSTAT: The system for statistics. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT, Inc.
46. Winograd, T. (1983). Language as a cognitive process. I: Syntax. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
47. Wixon, K.K. (1983). Postreading questions-answer interactions and children's learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 413-423.
48. Wyer, R.S., Srull, T.K., Gordon, S.E., & Hartwick, J. (1982). Effects of processing objectives on the recall of prose material. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 674-688.
49. Zock, M., & Sabah, G. (1992). La génération automatique de textes: trente ans déjà, ou presque. Langages. 106, 8-35.