Selecting microfilm for digital preservation: A case study from Project Open Book

Library Resources and Technical Services

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 67-77

  Conway, Paul ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030502926     PISSN: 00242527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5860/lrts.40n1.67     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Association of Research Libraries. 1990. Guidelines for bibliographic records for preservation microform masters. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.
2. Atkinson, Ross. 1986. Selection for preservation: A materialistic approach. Library resources & technical services 30: 341-53.
3. Bates, Marcia J. 1979. Information search tactics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 30: 205-14.
4. _. 1989. Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment. Library resources & technical services 33: 400-12.
5. Bates, Marcia J., Deborah N. Wilde, and Susan Siegfried. 1993. An analysis of search terminology used by humanities scholars: The Getty online searching project report number 1. Library quarterly 63: 1-39.
6. Case, Donald Owen. 1991. The collection and use of information by some American historians: A study of motives and methods. Library quarterly 61: 61-82.
7. Child, Margaret. 1990. Selection for microfilming. American archivist 53: 250-55.
8. _. 1992. Selection for preservation. In Advances in preservation and access. Vol. 1. Ed. Barbra Buckner Higginbotham and Mary E. Jackson. Westport, Conn.: Meckler, 147-58.
9. Commission on Preservation and Access. 1993. Preservation of archival materials: A report of the task forces on archival selection to the Commission on Preservation and Access. Washington, D.C.: Commission on Preservation and Access.
10. Conway, Paul. 1994. Digitizing preservation: Microfilm and paper go electronic. Library journal 119: 42-45.
11. Conway, Paul, and Shari Weaver. 1994. The setup phase of Project Open Book. Washington, D.C.: Commission on Preservation and Access.
12. Cox, Richard J. 1989. Selecting historical records for microfilming: Some suggested procedures for repositories. Library & archival security 9: 21-41.
13. Davis, Stephen Paul. 1995. Digital image collections: Cataloging data model & network access. Internet document available at: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/libraries/ins ide/projects/diap/paper.html
14. Demas, Samuel. 1994. Setting preservation priorities at Mann Library: A disciplinary approach. Library hi tech 12, no.3: 81-88.
15. De Stephano, Paula. 1995. Use-based selection for preservation microfilming. College & research libraries 56: 409-18.
16. Elkington, Nancy E. 1992. RLG preservation microfilming handbook. Mountain View, Calif.: Research Libraries Group.
17. Farr, George F. 1992. NEH's program for the preservation of brittle books. In Advances in preservation and access, vol. 1, eds. Barbra Buckner Higginbotham and Mary E. Jackson. Westport, Conn.: Meckler, 49-60.
18. Gordon, Ann D. 1992. Using the nation's documentary heritage: The report of the Historical Documents Study. Washington, D.C.: National Historical Publications and Records Commission.
19. Gould, Constance. 1989. Information needs in the humanities: An assessment. Stanford: Research Libraries Group.
20. Gwinn, Nancy E. 1987. Preservation microfilming: A guide for librarians and archivists. Chicago: ALA.
21. Gwinn, Nancy E., and Paul H. Mosher. 1983. Coordinating collection development: The RLG conspectus. College & research libraries 44: 128-40.
22. Hazen, Dan C. 1995. Collection development policies in the information age. College & research libraries 56: 29-31.
23. Hitchcock, Jennette E. 1953. The Yale library classification. Yale University library gazette 27: 95-109.
24. Johnson, Bruce C., ed. 1995. Guidelines for bibliographic description of reproductions. Chicago: ALA.
25. Lancaster, F. W., and others. 1991. Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs. Library resources & technical services 35: 377-91.
26. Markey, Karen. 1987. Searching and browsing in the Dewey Decimal Classification in an online catalog. Cataloging & classification quarterly 7: 37-68.
27. Riecken, Henry. 1990. The agony of choice: Strategies for preservation and scholarship. In Annual report 1989-90. Washington, D.C.: Commission on Preservation and Access, 7-13.
28. Stam, David H. 1993. The questions of preservation. In Research libraries - Yesterday, today, and tomorrow, ed. William J. Welsh. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 303-18.
29. Tibbo, Helen. 1993. Abstracting, information retrieval and the humanities: Providing access to historical literature. ACRL publications in librarianship, no. 48. Chicago: ALA.
30. Walker, Gay. 1983. Preserving intellectual content of deteriorated library materials. In The preservation challenge: A guide to conserving library materials, ed. Carolyn Clark Morrow. White Plains, N.Y.: Knowledge Industry Publications, 93-113.
31. Walker, Gay, and others. 1985. The Yale survey: A large-scale survey of book deterioration in the Yale University Library. College & research libraries 46: 111-32.
32. Waters, Donald J. 1991. From microfilm to digital imagery. Washington, D.C.: Commission on Preservation and Access.
33. Waters, Donald J., and Shari Weaver. 1992. The organizational phase of Project Open Book. Washington, D.C.: Commission on Preservation and Access.
34. Wiberley, Stephen E., Jr. 1983. Subject access in the humanities and the precision of the humanists' vocabulary. Library quarterly 53: 420-33.
35. Wildemuth, Barbara M., and Ann L. O'Neill. 1995. The "known" in known-item searches: Empirical support for user-centered design. College & research libraries 56: 265-81.
36. Yee, Martha M. 1991. System design and cataloging meet the user: User interfaces to online public access catalogs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42: 78-98.