The analysis of three-way contingency tables by three-mode association models

Psychometrika

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 465-483

  Anderson, Carolyn J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Association models; Loglinear models; Three factor interactions; Tucker's 3 mode components model

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030502315     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02294550     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Becker, M. P. (1989). Models for the analysis of association in multivariate contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 1014-1019.
2. Becker, M. P. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation of the RC(M) association model. Applied Statistics, 39, 152-167.
3. Becker, M. P., & Clogg, C. C. (1989). Analysis of sets of two-way contingency tables using association models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 142-151.
4. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5. Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika, 35, 283-319.
6. Choulakian, V. (1988a). Exploratory analysis of contingency tables by loglinear formulations and generalizations of correspondence analysis. Psychometrika, 53, 235-250.
7. Choulakian, V. (1988b). Errata. Psychometrika, 53, 593.
8. Clogg, C. C. (1982a). Some models for the analysis of association in multiway cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 803-815.
9. Clogg, C. C. (1982b). Using association models in sociological research: some examples. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 115-134.
10. Clogg, C. C. (1986). Statistical modeling versus singular value decomposition. International Statistical Review, 54, 284-288.
11. Clogg, C. C., Eliason, S. R., & Wahl, R. J. (1990). Labor-market experience and labor-force outcomes. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 53-62.
12. Faust, K., & Wasserman, S. (1993). Correlation and association models for studying measurements on ordinal relations. Sociological Methodology, 23, 177-215.
13. Gilula, Z., & Haberman, S. J. (1988). The analysis of multiway contingency tables by restricted canonical and restricted association models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Theory and Methods, 83, 760-771.
14. Goodman, L. A. (1979). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 537-552.
15. Goodman, L. A. (1981). Association models and canonical correlation models in the analysis of cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 320-334.
16. Goodman, L. A. (1985). The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered and/or unordered categories: Association models, correlation models, and asymmetry models for contingency tables with or without missing entries. The Annals of Statistics, 13, 10-69.
17. Goodman, L. A. (1986). Some useful extensions of the usual correspondence analysis approach and the usual log-linear models approach in the analysis of contingency tables. International Statistical Review, 54, 243-309.
18. Goodman, L. A. (1991). Measures, models, and graphical displays in the analysis of cross-classified data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 1085-1111.
19. Harshman, R. A., & Lundy, M. E. (1984). The PARAFAC model for three-way factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. In H. G. Law, C. W. Synder, J. Hattie, & R. P. McDonald (Eds), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp 122-215). New York, NY: Praeger.
20. Kapteyn, A., Neudecker, H., & Wansbeek, T. (1986). An approach to n-mode component analysis. Psychometrika, 51, 269-275.
21. Kramer, L., & Gottman, J. M. (1992). Becoming a sibling: "With a little help from my friends." Developmental Psychology, 28, 685-699.
22. Kroonenberg, P. M. (1983). Three-mode principal component analysis: Theory and applications. Leiden, The Netherlands: DWSO Press.
23. Kruskal, J. B. (1984). Multilinear models. In H. G. Law, C. W. Synder, J. Hattie, & R. P. McDonald (Eds), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp 36-62). New York, NY: Praeger.
24. Mooijaart, A. (1992). Three-factor interaction models by log-trilinear terms in three-way contingency tables. Statistica Applicata, 4, 669-677.
25. Sherkat, D. E. (1993). Theory and method in religious mobility research. Social Science Research, 22, 208-227.
26. Smith, H. L., & Garnier, M. A. (1987). Scaling via models for the analysis of association: Social background and educational careers in France. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology, (pp. 205-246) Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
27. ten Berge, J. M. F., de Leeuw, J., & Kroonenberg, P. M. (1987). Some additional results on principal components analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms. Psychometrika, 52, 183-191.
28. Tucker, L. R. (1964). The extension of factor analysis to three-dimensional matrices. In N. Fredieriksen & H. Gulliksen (Eds.), Contributions to mathematical psychology (pp. 110-127). NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
29. Tucker, L. R. (1966). Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 31, 279-311.
30. van der Heijden, P. G. M., de Falguerolles, A., & de Leeuw, J. (1989). A combined approach to contingency table analysis using correspondence analysis and log-linear modeling. Applied Statistics, 2, 249-292.
31. van der Heijden, P. G. M., & de Leeuw, J. (1985). Correspondence analysis used complementary to loglinear analysis. Psychometrika, 50, 429-447.
32. van der Heijden, P. G. M., & de Leeuw, J. (1989). Correspondence analysis with special attention to the analysis of panel data and event history data. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 43-87). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
33. Xie, Y. (1991). Model fertility schedules revisited: the log-multiliplicative model approach. Social Science Research, 20, 355-368.
34. Xie, Y. (1992). The log-multiplicative layer effect model for comparing mobility tables. American Sociological Review, 57, 380-395.
35. Xie, Y., & Pimentel, E. E. (1992). Age patterns of maritial fertility: Revising the Coale-Trussell method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 977-984.