Nato's persistence after the cold war

International Organization

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 445-475

  McCalla, Robert B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030500957     PISSN: 00208183     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0020818300033440     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Barnett, Michael N., and Jack S. Levy. 1991. Domestic sources of alliances and alignments: The case of Egypt, 1962-73. International Organization 45:369-96.
2. Bennett, Andrew, Joseph Lepgold, and Danny Unger. 1994. Burden-sharing in the Persian Gulf War. International Organization 48:39-75.
3. Beschloss, Michael R., and Strobe Talbot. 1993. At the highest levels: The inside story of the end of the cold war. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
4. Blais, André, and Stéphane Dion, eds. 1991. The budget maximizing bureaucrat: Appraisals and evidence. Pittsburgh, Penn.: University of Pittsburgh Press.
5. Bland, Douglas L. 1991. The Military Committee of the North Atlantic Alliance: A study of structure and strategy. New York: Praeger.
6. Blau, Peter M., and Marshall W. Meyer. 1987. Bureaucracy in modern society. 3d ed. New York: Random House.
7. Boyer, Mark A. 1993. International cooperation and public goods: Opportunities for the Western alliance. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Brown, Michael E. 1995. The flawed logic of NATO expansion. Survival 37:34-52.
9. Bruce, Erika v.C. 1992. NATO's public opinion seminar indicates continuing, but not unshakeable support. NATO Review 40(2): 3-8.
10. Carpenter, Ted Galen, ed. 1994. The future of NATO. A special issue of The Journal of Strategic Studies 17:1-169.
11. Christensen, Thomas J., and Jack Snyder. 1990. Chain gangs and passed bucks: Predicting alliance patterns in multipolarity. International Organization 44:137-68.
12. Christopher, Warren. August 1993. Towards a NATO summit. NATO Review 41(4): 3-6.
13. _. 1995. Post-election foreign policy: America's leadership, America's opportunity. Foreign Policy 98:6-27.
14. Clarke, Jonathan. 1993/94. Replacing NATO. Foreign Policy 93:22-40.
15. Cohen, Benjamin J. 1982. Balance-of-payments financing: Evolution of a regime. International Organization 36:457-78.
16. Cook, Don. 1989. Forging the alliance: NATO, 1945-1950. London: Seeker and Warburg.
17. Cowhey, Peter F. 1993. Domestic institutions and the credibility of international commitments: Japan and the United States. International Organization 47:299-326.
18. DePorte, Anton W. 1990. NATO and detente: Cycles in history. In NATO after forty years, edited by Lawrence S. Kaplan, S. Victor Papacosma, Mark R. Rubin, and Ruth V. Young. Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources.
19. Domke, William K., Richard C. Eichenberg, and Catherine M. Kelleher. 1987. Consensus lost? Domestic politics and the "crisis" in NATO. World Politics 39:382-407.
20. Duffield, John S. 1992. International regimes and alliance behavior: Explaining NATO conventional force levels. International Organization 46:819-55.
21. _. 1994/95. NATO's functions after the cold war. Political Science Quarterly 109:763-87.
22. _. 1995. NATO and alliance theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, 21-25 February, Chicago.
23. Eckstein, Harry. 1975. Case study and theory in political science. In Strategies of inquiry. Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7. Edited by Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
24. Eichenberg, Richard C. 1989. Public opinion and national security in Western Europe: Consensus lost? New York: Macmillan.
25. Eide, Vigleik. 1992. The military dimension in the transformed alliance. NATO Review 40(4): 20-25.
26. Flynn, Gregory, and Hans Rattinger. 1985. The public and Atlantic defense. In The public and Atlantic defense, edited by Gregory Flynn and Hans Rattinger. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.
27. _, eds. 1985. The public and Atlantic defense. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld.
28. George, Alexander L. 1979. Case studies and theory development: The method of structured, focused comparison. In Diplomacy: New approaches in history, theory, and policy, edited by Paul G. Lauren. New York: The Free Press.
29. Glaser, Charles L. 1993. Why NATO is still best: Future security arrangements for Europe. International Security 18:5-50.
30. Gordon, Colin. 1978. The Atlantic alliance: A bibliography. London: Frances Pinter.
31. Hall, Richard H. 1991. Organizations: Structures, processes and outcomes, 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
32. Hellmann, Gunther, and Reinhard Wolf. 1993. Neorealism, neoliberal institutionalism, and the future of NATO. Security Studies 3:3-43.
33. Holden, Matthew, Jr. 1966. 'Imperialism' in bureaucracy. American Political Science Review 60:943-51.
34. Holsti, Ole R., P. Terrence Hopmann, and John D. Sullivan. 1973. Unity and disintegration in international alliances: Comparative studies. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
35. Jervis, Robert. 1982. Security regimes. International Organization 36:357-78.
36. Kegley, Charles W., Jr., and Gregory A. Raymond. 1990. When trust breaks down: Alliance norms and world politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
37. Keohane, Robert O. 1982. The demand for international regimes. International Organization 36:325-55.
38. _. 1984. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
39. _. 1988. Alliances, threats, and the uses of neorealism. International Security 13:169-76.
40. _. 1989. International institutions and state power: Essays in international relations theory. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
41. _. 1993. Institutional theory and the realist challenge after the cold war. In Neorealism and neoliberalism: The contemporary debate, edited by David A. Baldwin. New York: Columbia University Press.
42. Keohane, Robert O., and Lisa Martin. 1995. The promise of institutionalist theory. International Security 20:39-51.
43. Knopf, Jeffrey W. 1993. Beyond two-level games: Domestic-international interaction in the intermediate-range nuclear forces negotiations. International Organization 47:599-628.
44. Krasner, Stephen D., ed. 1983. International regimes. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
45. Kriendler, John. 1993. NATO's changing role: Opportunities and constraints for peacekeeping. NATO Review 41(3): 16-23.
46. Kupchan, Charles A. 1988. NATO and the Persian Gulf: Examining intra-alliance behavior. International Organization 42:317-46.
47. Kupchan, Charles A., and Clifford A. Kupchan. 1995. The promise of collective security. International Security 20:52-61.
48. Legge, Michael. 1991. The making of NATO's new strategy. NATO Review 39(6): 9-14.
49. Lepgold, Joseph. 1994. Does Europe have a place in U.S. foreign policy? A domestic politics argument. In Discord and collaboration in a new Europe: Essays in honor of Arnold Wolfers, edited by Douglas T. Stuart and Stephen F. Szabo. Washington, D.C.: Johns Hopkins Foreign Policy Institute.
50. _. 1995. Does the United States make sense in NATO after the cold war? On what terms? In Post-cold war policy: The international context, edited by William Crotty. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
51. Lijphart, Arend. 1971. Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review 65:682-93.
52. Liska, George. 1962. Nations in alliance: The limits of interdependence. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press.
53. Mearsheimer, John J. 1990. Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the cold war. International Security 15:5-56.
54. _. 1994/95. The false promise of international institutions. International Security 19:5-49.
55. _. 1995. A realist reply. International Security 20:82-93.
56. Morgenthau, Hans. 1959. Alliances in theory and practice. In Alliance policy in the cold war, edited by Arnold Wolfers. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press, 1959.
57. Morrow, James D. 1993. Arms versus allies: Trade-offs in the search for security. International Organization 47:207-33.
58. Ness, Gayl D., and Steven R. Brechin. 1988. Bridging the gap: International organizations as organizations. International Organization 42:245-73.
59. Niskanen, William A. 1975. Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics 18:617-43.
60. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). December 1990. North Atlantic Council Ministerial Communiqué. NATO Review 38(6): 22-24.
61. _. 1991. The alliance's new Strategic Concept. NATO Review 39(6): 25-32.
62. _. 1995. NATO handbook. Brussels: NATO Information Service.
63. Oneal, John R., and Mark A. Elrod. 1989. NATO burden sharing and the forces of change. International Studies Quarterly 33:435-56.
64. Osgood, Robert E. 1968. Alliances and American foreign policy. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press.
65. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerald R. Salancik. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
66. Podeh, Elie. 1995. The quest for hegemony in the Arab world: The struggle over the Baghdad Pact. New York: E.J. Brill.
67. Reilly, John E. 1995. The public mood at mid-decade. Foreign Policy 98:76-93.
68. Riker, William H. 1962. The theory of political coalitions. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
69. Ruggie, John Gerard. 1995. The false premise of realism. International Security 20:62-70.
70. Scott, Richard W. 1987. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. 2d ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
71. Snyder, Glenn H. 1991a. Alliances, balance, and stability. International Organization 45:121-42.
72. _. 1991b. Alliance theory: A neorealist first cut. In The evolution of theory in international relations, edited by Robert L. Rothstein. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
73. Stein, Arthur. 1983. Coordination and collaboration: Regimes in an anarchic world. In International regimes, edited by Stephen D. Krasner. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
74. Stuart, Douglas. 1993. NATO's future as a pan-European security institution. NATO Review 41(4): 15-19.
75. Stuart, Douglas, and William Tow. 1990. The limits of alliance: NATO's out-of-area problems since 1949. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
76. Taft, William H., IV. 1991. European security: Lessons learned from the Gulf War. NATO Review 39(3): 7-11.
77. U.S. Congress. 1989. NATO at forty: Bibliographic resources. Congressional Research Service report for Congress, no. 89-175L. March.
78. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1992. NATO: A changing alliance faces new challenges. NSIAD-92-252. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
79. van Foreest, Herpert. 1993. Shared civil/military usage of NATO infrastructure. NATO Review 41(4): 23-25.
80. Wallander, Celeste A., and Robert O. Keohane. 1995. Toward an institutional theory of alliances. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, 21-25 February, Chicago.
81. Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The origins of alliances. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
82. _. 1988. Testing theories of alliance formation: The case of Southwest Asia. International Organization 42:275-316.
83. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
84. Ward, Michael Don. 1982. Research gaps in alliance dynamics. Monograph Series in World Affairs, vol. 19, no. 1. Denver, Colo.: Graduate School of International Studies.
85. Weber, Steve. 1992. Shaping the postwar balance of power: Multilateralism in NATO. International Organization 46:633-80.
86. Wendt, Alexander. 1995. Constructing international politics. International Security 20:71-81.
87. Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
88. Wörner, Manfred. 1991. The Atlantic Alliance in a new era. NATO Review 39(1): 3-10.
89. _. 1992. A vigorous alliance: A motor for peaceful change in Europe. NATO Review 40(6): 3-9.