Time-intensity as a tool for the measurement of meat tenderness

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 7, Issue 3-4, 1996, Pages 193-204

  Butler, G ^a   Poste, L M ^a   Mackie, D A ^a   Jones, A ^a  

^a AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0030499093     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(96)00031-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. AMSA, 1978. Guidelines for the cookery and sensory evaluation of meat. American Meat Science Association and National Livestock and Meat Board. Chicago, II. 24 pp.
2. Box, G. E. P. & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B, 26, 211-243.
3. Cliff, M. & Heymann, H. (1993). Development and use of time-intensity methodology for sensory evaluation: a review. Food Res. Int., 26, 375-385.
4. Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 611 pp.
5. Duizer, L. M. (1992). An assessment of sensory time-intensity and instrumental methods for bovine muscle tenderness measurements. M. Sc. Thesis. University of Guelph, Ontario.
6. Duizer, L. M., Gullett, E. A. & Findlay, C. J. (1994). The effect of masticatory patterns as measured by time-intensity and electromyography on the perception of bovine muscle tenderness. J. Sensory Stud., 9, 33-46.
7. Genstat 5 Committee (1993). Genstat 5 Release 3 Reference Manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
8. Larson-Powers, N. & Pangborn, R. M. (1978). Paired comparison and time intensity measurements of the sensory properties of beverages and gelatins containing sucrose or synthetic sweeteners. J. Food Sci, 43, 41-46.
9. Lundahl, D. S. (1992). Comparing time-intensity to category scales in sensory evaluation. Food Technol., 46, 98-103.
10. Lee, W. E., III & Pangborn, R. M. (1986). Time-intensity: the temporal aspects of sensory perception. Food Technol., 40, 71-82.
11. Liu, Y. H. & MacFie, H. J. H. (1990). Methods for averaging time-intensity curves. Chem. Sens., 15, 471-484.
12. Moore, L. J. & Shoemaker, C. F. (1981). Sensory textural properties of stabilized ice cream. J. Food Sci, 46(2), 399-402.
13. Muñoz, A. M., Pangborn, R. M. & Noble, A. C. (1986). Sensory and mechanical attributes of gel texture. II. Gelatin, sodium alginate and kappa-carrageenan gels. J. Text. Stud., 17, 17-36.
14. Noble, A. C., Matysizk, N. L. & Bonnans, S. (1991). Factors affecting the time-intensity parameters of sweetness. Food Technol, 45, 121-124, 126.
15. Pangborn, R. M. & Koyasako, A. (1981). Time-course of viscosity, sweetness and flavour in chocolate desserts. J. Text. Stud., 12, 141-150.
16. Pangborn, R. M., Lewis, M. J. & Yamashita, J. F. (1983). Comparison of time-intensity with category scaling of bitterness of iso-α-acids in model systems and in beer. J. Inst. Brewing, 89, 349-355.
17. Poste, L. M., Butler, G., Mackie, D., Agar, V. E., Thompson, B. K., Cliplef, R. L. & McKay, R. M. (1993). Correlations of sensory and instrumental meat tenderness values as affected by sampling techniques. Food Qual. Pref., 4, 207-214.
18. Poste, L. M., Mackie, D. A., Butler, G. & Larmond E. (1991). Laboratory methods for sensory analysis of foods. Publ. 1864. Agriculture Canada. 90 pp.
19. SAS Institute Inc. (1989). SAS/STAT® User's Guide, version 6, 4th ed, Vol. 2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 846 pp.
20. Szczesniak, A. S. (1963). Classification of textural characteristics. J. Food Sci, 28, 385-389.
21. Szczesniak, A. S., Brandt, M. A. & Friedman, H. H. (1963). Development of standard rating scales for mechanical parameters of texture and correlation between the objective and sensory methods of texture evaluation. J. Food Sci., 28, 397-403.
22. Voisey, P. W. & Hansen, H. (1967). A shear apparatus for meat tenderness evaluation. Food Technol, 21, 355-360.