Predictive validity of the SøDring Motor Evaluation Of Stroke Patients (SMES)

Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 211-216

  Wyller, Torgeir Bruun ^a   Sødring, Karen Margrethe ^a   Sveen, Unni ^a   Ljunggren, Anne Elisabeth ^a,b   Bautz Holter, Erik ^a  

^a ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Assessment; Cerebrovascular disorders; Motor activity; Physical therapy; Prognosis; Validity

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PROGNOSIS; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; ODDS RATIO; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0030497744     PISSN: 00365505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ashburn, A.: A physical assessment for stroke patients. Phys Ther 65: 109-113, 1982.
2. Carr, J. H., Shepherd, R. B., Nordholm, L. & Lynne, D.: Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 65: 175-180, 1985.
3. Chae, J., Johnston, M., Kim, H. & Zorowitz, R.: Admission motor impairment as a predictor of physical disability after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 74: 218-223, 1995.
4. Corriveau, H., Guarna, F., Dutil, E., Riley, E., Arsenault, A. B. & Drouin, G.: An evaluation of the hemiplegic subject based on the Bobath approach. Part II. The evaluation protocol. Scand J Rehabil Med 20: 5-11, 1988.
5. Dean, J. A., Dean, A. G., Burton, A. & Dicker R.: Epi Info. Computer programs for epidemiology. Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, 1988.
6. Dixon, W. J.: BMDP Statistical Software. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1992.
7. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Jääskö, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S. & Steglind, S.: The post stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 7: 13-31, 1975.
8. Fullerton, K. J., Mackenzie. G. & Stout, R. W.: Prognostic indices in stroke. Q J Med 66: 147-162, 1988
9. Hatano, S.: Experience from a multicentre stroke register: a preliminary report. Bull World Health Organ 54: 541-553, 1976.
10. Holbrook, M. & Skilbeck, C. E.: An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 12: 166-170, 1983.
11. Hosmer, D. W. & Lemeshow, S.: Applied logistic regression. John Wiley, New York, 1989.
12. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1980.
13. Jørgensen, H. S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H. O., Vive-Larsen, J., Støier, M. & Olsen, T. S. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76: 406-412, 1995.
14. Kalra, L. & Crome, P.: The role of prognostic scores in targeting stroke rehabilitation in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 41: 396-400, 1993.
15. Lincoln, N. & Leadbitter, D.: Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy 65: 48-51, 1979.
16. Lindmark, B. & Hamrin, E., Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention. Presentation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment and its reliability. Scand J Rehabil Med 20: 103-109, 1988.
17. Lindmark, B. & Hamrin, E.: Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention. Validation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment. Scand J Rehabil Med 20: 111-115, 1988.
18. Mahoney, F. I. & Barthel, D. W.: Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 14: 61-65, 1965
19. Mehta, C. & Patel N.: LogXact Turbo: Logistic regression software featuring exact methods. Cytel Software Corporation, Cambridge, MA., 1993.
20. Nakayama, H., Jørgensen, H. S., Raaschou, H. O. & Olsen, T S : The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 25. 808-813, 1994.
21. Olsen, T. S.: Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 21: 247-251, 1990.
22. Sackett, D. L., Haynes, R. B., Guyatt, G. H. & Tugwell, P.: Clinical epidemiology. A basic science for clinical medicine. Second edition. Little, Brown, Boston, 1991.
23. Schuling, J., de Haan, R., Limburg, M. & Groenier, K. H.: The Frenchay Activities Index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke 24: 1173-1177, 1993.
24. Sheikh, K., Brennan, P. J., Meade, T. W., Smith, D. S & Goldenberg, E.: Predictors of mortality and disability in stroke. J Epidemiol Community Health 37: 70-74, 1983.
25. Sødring, K. M.: The Sødring Evaluation Method of Stroke Patients. Manual. Clinic for Geriatric and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, 1994.
26. Sødring, K. M., Bautz-Holter, E., Ljunggren, A. E & Wyller, T. B.: Description and validation of a test of motor function and activities in stroke patients. The Sødring Motor Evaluation of Stroke Patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 27 211-217, 1995
27. Wade, D. T. & Collin C.: The Barthel ADL Index a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Studies 10: 64-67, 1988.
28. Wade, D. T., Legh-Smith, J. & Hewer, R. L.: Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med J. 176-181, 1985.
29. Wade, D. T., Skilbeck, C. E., Wood, V. A. & Hewer, R L. Long-term survival after stroke. Age Ageing 13: 76-82, 1984.