Patterns of knowledge communities in the social sciences

Library Trends

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 204-225

  Pahre, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030496429     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Barnes, B. (1983). On the conventional character of knowledge and cognition. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 19-52). London, England: Sage.
2. Bauer, H. (1990). The antithesis. Social Epislemology, 4(2), 215-227.
3. Becher, T. (1990). The counter-culture of specialisation. European Journal of Education, 25(3), 333-346.
4. Becher, T. (1994). Interdisciplinarity and community. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Academic community: Discourse or discord (pp. 55-71). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
5. Ben-David, J. (1973). How to organize research in the social sciences. Daedalus, 102(2), 39-51.
6. Berger, G. (1972). Opinions and facts. In L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs, & M. Guy (Eds.), Report of the Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI) (pp. 23-76). Paris, France: OECD. Paris,France:OECD
7. de Bie, P. (1970). Problem-focused research. In Main trends of research in the social and human sciences. Part One: Social Sciences (pp. 578-645). Paris/The Hague: Mouton/Unesco.
8. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London, England: Routledge Kegan Paul.
9. Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 1(6), 19-47.
10. Boxer, M. (1982). For and about women: The theory and practice of women's studies in the United States. Signs, 7(3), 661-695.
11. Campbell, D. T. (1969). Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the Fish-Seale Model of Omniscience. In M. Sherif & C. W. Sherif (Eds.), Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences (pp. 328-348). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
12. Campbell, D. T. (1979). A tribal model of the social system vehicle carrying scientific knowledge. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(2), 181-201.
13. Campbell, D. T. (1986). Science policy from a naturalistic sociological epistemology. In P. D. Asquith & P. Kitcher (Eds.), PSA 1984 (vol. 2, pp. 14-29). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
14. Campbell, D. T. (1994). Foreword: Toward a sociology of scientific validity. In K-M Kim (Ed.), Explaining scientific consensus: The case of Mendelian genetics (pp. ix-xviii). New York: The Guilford Press.
15. Campbell, D. T. & Paller, B. T. (1989). Extending evolutionary epistemology to "justifying" scientific beliefs (A sociological rapprochement with a fallibilist perceptual foundationalism?). In K. Hahlweg & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Issues in evolutionary epistemology (pp. 231-257). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
16. Chubin, D. E. (1976). The conceptualization of scientific specialties. Sociological Quarterly, 17(4), 448-476.
17. Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18. Cole, S. (1992). Making science: Between nature and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Collins, H. M. (1981). Stages in the empirical programme of relativism. Social Studies of Science, 11, 3-10.
20. Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. J. (1979). The construction of the paranormal: Nothing unscientific is happening. In R. Wallis (Ed.), On the margins of science: The social construction of rejected knowledge (Sociological Review Monograph No. 27) (pp. 237-270). Staffordshire, England: University of Keele.
21. Collins, R. (1992). Replies and objections. Social Epistemology, 6(3), 267-272.
22. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23. Deardorff, A. V. (1984). Testing trade theories and predicting trade flows. In R. W. Jones & P. B. Kenen (Eds.), Handbook of international economics (vol. 1, pp. 467-517). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
24. Delamont, S. (1987). Three blind spots? A comment on the sociology of science by a puzzled outsider. Social Studies of Science, 17(1), 163-170.
25. Dogan, M., & Pahre, R. (1990). Creative marginality: Innovation at the intersections of social sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26. Feigenbaum, S., & Levy, D. M. (1993). The market for (ir)reproducible econometrics. Social Epistemology, 7(3), 215-232.
27. Fuller, S. (1987). On regulating what is known: A way to social epistemology. Synthese, 73(1), 145-183.
28. Fuller, S. (1988). Social epistemology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
29. Fuller, S. (1993). Disciplinary boundaries and the rhetoric of the social sciences. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity (pp. 125-149). Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
30. Giere, R. N. (1985). The philosophy of science naturalized. Philosophy of Science, 52(3), 331-356.
31. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795.
32. Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin Books.
33. Goldman, A. I. (1987). Foundations of social epistemics. Synthese, 73(1), 109-144.
34. Goldman, H. (1995). Innovation and change in the production of knowledge. Social Epistemology, 9(3), 211-232.
35. Gunew, S. (1990). Feminist knowledge: Critique and construct. In S. Gunew (Ed.), Feminist knowledge: Critique and construct (pp. 13-35). London, England: Routledge.
36. Harbers, H., & de Vries, G. (1993). The empirical consequences of the "double hermeneutic." Social Epistemology, 7(2), 183-192.
37. Heckhausen, H. (1972). Discipline and interdisciplinarity. In L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs, & G. Michaud (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (Report of the Centre for Educational Research and Innovation [CERI]) (pp. 83-88). Paris: OECD.
38. Hirshleifer, J. (1985). The expanding domain of economics. American Economic Review, 72(6), 53-68.
39. Huber, L. (1990). Disciplinary cultures and social reproduction. European Journal of Education, 25(3), 241-261.
40. Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, & practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
41. Klein, J. T. (1993). Blurring, cracking, and crossing: Permeation and the fracturing of discipline. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity (pp. 185-211). Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
42. Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
43. Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1983). The ethnographic study of scientific work: Towards a constructivist interpretation of science. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 90, 115-140). London, England: Sage.
44. Knorr-Cetina, K. D., & Mulkay, M. (1983). Introduction: Emerging principles in social studies of science. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 1-18). London, England: Sage.
45. Knorr-Cetina, K. D., & Mulkay, M. (Eds.). (1983). Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science. London, England: Sage.
46. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-196). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
48. Lakatos, I. (1978). Mathematics, science and epistemology: Philosophical papers (vol. 2, J. Worrall & G. Currie, eds.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
50. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
51. Leamer, E. E., & Stern, R. M. (1970). Quantitative international economics. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
52. Livingston, E. (1993). The disciplinarity of knowledge at the math-physics interface. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity (pp. 368-393). Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
53. Lynch, W. (1993). What does the double hermeneutic explain/justify? Social Epistemology, 7(2), 193-204.
54. Lynch, M.; Livingston, E.; & Garfinkel, H. (1983). Temporal order in laboratory work. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 205-238). London, England: Sage.
55. Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and utopia. London, England: Routledge Kegan Paul.
56. McCloskey, D. N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
57. Merton, R. K. (1938/1970). Science, technology and society in seventeenth century England. New York: H. Fertig.
58. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
59. Messer-Davidow, E. (forthcoming). Dollars for scholars: The real politics of humanities scholarship and programs. In G. Levine & E. A. Kaplan (Eds.), The politics of research. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
60. Moran, G., & Mallory, M. (1991). Some ethical considerations regarding scholarly communication. Library Trends, 40(2), 338-356.
61. Mulkay, M. J. (1977). Sociology of the scientific research community. In I. Spiegel-Rosing &D. de S. Price (Eds.), Science, technology, and society (pp. 93-147). London, England: Sage.
62. Mulkay, M. (1979). Science and the sociology of knowledge. London, England: Allen & Unwin.
63. Mulkay, M.; Potter, J.; & Yearley, S. (1983). Why an analysis of scientific discourse is needed. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 171-203). London, England: Sage.
64. Mullins, N. C. (1973). The development of specialties in social science: The case of ethnomethodology. Science Studies, 3(July), 245-273.
65. North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: W.W. Norton.
66. Pahre, R. (1995). Positivist discourse and social scientific communities: Towards an epistemological sociology of science. Social Epistemology, 9(3), 233-255.
67. Pahre, R. (1996). Mathematical discourse and crossdisciplinary communities: The case of political economy. Social Epistemology, 10(1), 55-73.
68. Pawluch, D., &. Woolgar, S. (1985). How shall we move beyond constructivism? Social Problems, 33(December), 159-162.
69. Pinch, T. J. (1979). Normal explanations of the paranormal: The demarcation problem and fraud in parapsychology. Social Studies of Science, 9(3), 329-348.
70. Pinch, T.J. (1990). The culture of scientists and disciplinary rhetoric. European Journal of Education, 25(3), 295-305.
71. Pöyhönen, P. (1963). A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90, 93-99.
72. Quine, W. V. O. (1969). Epistemology naturalized. In W. V. O. Quine (Ed.), Ontological relativity and other essays (pp. 69-90). New York: Columbia University Press.
73. Schmaus, W.; Segerstrale, U.; & Jesseph, D. (1992). Symposium on the "hard program" in the sociology of scientific knowledge: A manifesto. Social Epistemology, 6(3), 243-265.
74. Small, H., & Garfield, E. (1985). The geography of science: Disciplinary and national mappings. Journal of Information Science, 11(4), 147-149.
75. Sheridan, S. (1990). Feminist knowledge, women's liberation, and women's studies. In S. Gunew (Ed.), Feminist knowledge: Critique and construct (pp. 36-55). London, England: Routledge.
76. Stoan, S. K. (1991). Research and information retrieval among academic researchers: Implications for library instruction. Library Trends, 39(3), 238-257.
77. Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
78. Wallerstein, I. (1991). Unthinking social science: The limits of nineteenth-century paradigms. Cambridge, England: Polity Press and Basil Blackwell.
79. Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
80. Woolgar, S. (1983). Irony in the social study of science. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 239-266). London, England: Sage.
81. Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States, New York: The Free Press.