A note on item homogeneity defined by multivariate symmetry

Studia Psychologica

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 199-202

  Rost, J ^a   Langeheine, R ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION   (Germany)

Author keywords

(quasi) symmetry models; Contingency tables; Item homogeneity; Log linear representation; Rasch models

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030495244     PISSN: 00393320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. AGRESTI, A., 1993, Computing conditional maximum likelihood estimates for generalized Rasch models using simple loglinear models with diagonal parameters. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 20, 63-71.
2. BISHOP, Y.M.M., FIENBERG, S.E., HOLLAND, P.W., 1975, Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
3. CONAWAY, M.R., 1989, Analysis of repeated categorical measurements with conditional likelihood methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 53-62.
4. HAGENAARS, J.A., 1990, Categorical longitudinal data. Log-linear panel, trend and cohort analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
5. KELDERMAN, H., 1984, Log-linear Rasch model tests. Psychometrika, 39, 223-245.
6. KELDERMAN, H., 1995, The polytomous Rasch model within the class of generalized symmetry models. In: G.H. Fischer, I.W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer, 307-323.
7. LIENERT, G.A., RAATZ, U., 1981, Item homogeneity defined by multivariate symmetry. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 263-269.
8. LORD, F.M., NOVICK, M.R., 1968, Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
9. MADANSKY, A., 1963, Tests of homogeneity for correlated samples. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 97-119.
10. McNEMAR, Q., 1974, Note on sampling error of the differences between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika, 12, 153.