Competition and competitiveness in urban policy

Public Money and Management

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 21-26

  Stewart, Murray ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030495182     PISSN: 09540962     EISSN: 14679302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09540969609387929     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Boyle, M. and Hughes, G. (1991), The politics of the representation of the ‘real’: Discourses from the left on Glasgow’s role as European City of Culture, 1990. Area.
2. Burgess, J. (1982), Selling places: Environmental images for the executive. Regional Studies, 16, 1.
3. CEC (1994), Co-operation for European Territorial Development (Office for the Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).
4. Cheshire, P. C. and Hay D. G. (1986), Urban Problems in Western Europe.
5. de Groot, L. (1992), City Challenge: Competing in the urban regeneration game. Local Economy, 7, 3.
6. Gold, J. R. and Ward S. V. (1994), Place Promotion: The Use of Publicity and Marketing to Sell Towns and Regions (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester).
7. Hambleton, R. and Taylor, M. (1994), People in Cities: A Transatlantic Policy Exchange (School for Advanced Urban Studies, Bristol).
8. Hutchinson, J. (1994), The practice of partnership in local economic development. Local Government Studies, 20, 3.
9. King, D. (1990), Economic activity and the challenge to local government. In King, D. and Pierre, J. (Eds), Challenges to Local Government (Sage, London).
10. Logan, J. R. and Molotch, H. L. (1987), Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place (University of California Press).
11. Malpass, P. (1994), Policy making and local governance: How Bristol failed to secure City Challenge funding (twice). Policy and Politics, 22, 4.
12. Mawson J. et al. (1995), The Single Regeneration Budget: Stocktake I (Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham).
13. Mawson J. et al. (1996), The Single Regeneration Budget: Stocktake: A Review of Challenge Round II (Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham).
14. Oatley, N. and Lambert, C. (1995), Evaluating competitive urban policy: The City Challenge initiative. In Hambleton, R. and Thomas, H. (Eds), Urban Policy Evaluation (Paul Chapman Publishing, London).
15. Paddison, R. (1993), City marketing, image reconstruction and urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 30, 2.
16. Parkinson, M., Bianchini, F., Dawson, J., Evans, R. and Harding, A. (1992), Urbanization and the Functions of Cities in the European Community (DG XVI CEC, Brussels).
17. Peterson, P. E. (1981), City Limits (Chicago University Press, Chicago).
18. Peterson, P. E. and Rom, C. R. (1990), Welfare Magnets: A New Case for a National Standard (Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.).
19. Solesbury, W. (1993), Reframing urban policy. Policy and Politics, 21, 1.
20. Stewart, M. (1994), Value for money in urban public expenditure. Public Money & Management, 14, 4.
21. Stewart, M. et al. (1996), Partnership in the Regeneration of Urban Scotland (HMSO, London).
22. Tiebout, C.M. (1956), Apure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64.