Women who tell and men who ask: Perceptions of men and women departing from gender stereotypes during initial interaction

Sex Roles

Volumn 34, Issue 11-12, 1996, Pages 767-786

  Lindsey, A Elizabeth ^a   Zakahi, Walter R ^b  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030494104     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF01544315     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allen, B. P. (1995). Gender stereotypes are not accurate: A replication of Martin (1987) using diagnostic vs. self-report and behavioral criteria. Sex Roles, 32, 583-600.
2. Anderson, S. M., & Bem, S. L. (1981). Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in response to physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 74-86.
3. Aries, E. (1987). Gender and communication. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and Gender (pp. 124-148). Newbury Park CA: Sage.
4. Bem, S. L. (1981). The Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
5. Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 122-144). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6. Berger, C. R., & Bradac, J. J. (1982). Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty reduction in interpersonal relations. London: Edward Arnold.
7. Bierhoff, H.-W. (1989). Person perception and attribution. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8. Bradley, P. H. (1981). The folk-linguistics of women's speech: An empirical examination. Communication Monographs, 48, 73-90.
9. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations theory: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55, 58-79.
10. Burgoon, M., Birk, T. S., Hall, J. R. (1991). Compliance and satisfaction with physician-patient communication: An expectancy theory interpretation of gender differences. Human Communication Research, 18, 177-208.
11. Burgoon, M., & Miller, G. R. (1985) An expectancy interpretation of language and persuasion. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Recent advances in language communication and social psychology (pp. 199-229). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Canary, D. J., & Hause, K. S. (1993). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication? Communication Quarterly, 41, 129-144.
13. Cappella, J. N., & Greene, J. O. (1982). A discrepancy-arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant-adult interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 89-114.
14. Costrich, N., Feinstein, J., Kidder, L., Marecek, J., & Pascale, L. (1975). When stereotypes hurt: Three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 520-530.
15. Davis, J. D. (1978). When boy meets girl: Sex roles and the negotiation of intimacy in an acquaintance exercise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 684-692.
16. Deaux, K. (1977). Sex differences. In T. Blass (Ed.), Personality variables in social behavior (pp. 357-377). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
17. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987) . Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369-389.
18. Derlega, V., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Derlega, V., Winstead, B., Wong, P., & Hunter, S. (1985). Gender effects in an initial encounter: A case where men exceeded women in disclosure. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 25-44.
20. Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106-124.
21. Douglas, W. (1990). Uncertainty, information-seeking, and liking during initial interaction. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 66-81.
22. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Fishman, P. M. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, 25, 397-406.
24. Frable, D. E. S. (1989). Sex typing and gender ideology: Two facets of the individual's gender psychology that go together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 95-108.
25. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Harding, S. (1975). Women and words in a Spanish village. In R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women. New York: Monthly Review Press.
27. Holsti, O. R. (1968). Content analysis. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, (vol. 3, pp. 596-692). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
28. Jones, E. E., & McGillis, D. (1976). Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.) New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 389-420). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Jussim, L., Coleman, L. M., & Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536-546.
30. Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and women's place. New York: Harper & Row.
31. Lockheed, M. E., & Hall, K. P. (1976). Conceptualizing sex as a status characteristics: Applications to leadership training strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 111-124.
32. Martin, C. L. (1987). A ratio measure of sex stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 489-499.
33. McCloskey, L. A. (1987). Gender and conversation: Mixing and matching styles. In D. B. Carter (Ed.), Current conceptions of sex roles and sex typing: Theory and research (pp. 139-153).
34. McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261-266.
35. McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1979). The reliability and validity of scales for the measurement of interpersonal attraction and homophily. Paper presented at the Eastern Communication Association Convention, Philadelphia.
36. McKenzie-Mohr, D., & Zanna, M. P (1990). Treating women as sexual objects: Look to the (gender-schematic) male who has viewed pornography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 296-308.
37. McKinney, D. H., & Donaghy, W. C. (1993). Dyad gender structure, uncertainty reduction, and self-disclosure during initial interaction. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 33-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
38. Park, B., & Hahn, S. (1988). Sex-role identity and the perception of others. Social Cognition, 6, 61-87.
39. Petronio, S., Martin, J., & Littlefield, R. (1984). Prerequisite conditions for self-disclosure: A gender issue. Communication Monographs, 51, 268-273.
40. Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730-738.
41. Schneider, D. J., Hastorf, A. H., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1979). Person perception (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
42. Smith-Lovin, L., & Robinson, D. T. (1992). Gender and conversational dynamics. In C. L. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender, interaction, and inequality (pp. 122-156). NY: Springer-Verlag.
43. Skrypnek, B. J., & Snyder, M. (1982). On the self-perpetuating nature of stereotypes about women and men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 277-291.
44. Spence, J. T. (1991). Gender-related traits and gender: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624-635.
45. Spender, D. (1980). Man made language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
46. Stokes, J., Childs, L., & Fuehrer (1981). Gender and sex roles as predictors of self-disclosure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 510-514.
47. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.