Exact probabilities for first-order and second-order interactions in 2 × 2 × 2 contingency tables

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 843-847

  Mielke Jr , Paul W ^a   Berry, Kenneth J ^b  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030490412     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164496056005012     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bartlett, M. S. (1935). Contingency table interactions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Supplement, 2, 248-252.
2. Berry, K. J., & Mielke, P. W. (1985). Subroutines for computing exact chi-square and Fisher's exact probability tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 153-159.
3. Darroch, J. N. (1962). Interactions in multi-factor contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 24, 251-263.
4. Darroch, J. N. (1974). Multiplicative and additive interaction in contingency tables. Biometrika, 61, 207-214.
5. Haber, M. (1983). Sample sizes for the exact test of "no interaction" in 2 × 2 × 2 tables. Biometrics, 39, 493-498.
6. Haber, M. (1984). A comparison of tests for the hypothesis of no three-factor interaction in 2 × 2 × 2 contingency tables. Journal of Statistical Computing and Simulation, 20, 205-215.
7. Mielke, P. W., & Berry, K. J. (1992). Fisher's exact probability test for cross-classification tables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 97-101.
8. Mielke, P. W., Berry, K. J., & Zelterman, D. (1994). Fisher's exact test of mutual independence for 2 × 2 × 2 cross-classification tables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 110-114.
9. Odoroff, C. L. (1970). A comparison of minimum logit chi-square estimation and maximum likelihood estimation in 2 × 2 × 2 and 3 × 2 × 2 contingency tables: Tests for interaction. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 1617-1631.
10. O'Neill, M. E. (1982). A comparison of the additive and multiplicative definitions of second-or-der interaction in 2 × 2 × 2 contingency tables. Journal of Statistical Computing and Simulation, 15, 33-50.
11. Plackett, R. L. (1962). A note on interactions in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 24, 162-166.
12. Pomar, M. I. (1984). Demystifying loglinear analysis: Four ways to assess interaction. Sociological Perspectives, 27, 111-135.
13. Quetelet, M. A. (1849). Letters addressed to H.R.H. the Grand Duke of Saxe Coburg and Gotha on the theory of probabilities as applied to the moral and political sciences (O. G. Downes, Trans.). London: Charles & Edwin Layton.
14. Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 13, 238-241.
15. Zachs, S., & Solomon, H. (1976). On testing and estimating the interaction between treatments and environmental conditions in binomial experiments: The case of two stations. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, A, 5, 197-223.