Tipping the balance: Autopoiesis and governance

Administration and Society

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 299-334

  Dunsire, Andrew ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030487892     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009539979602800302     Document Type: Article

References (126)

1. Artistotle. (1912). The politics (W. Ellis, Trans. ). London: Dent.
2. Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
3. Balch, G. I. (1980). The stick, the carrot and other strategies. In J. Brigham & D. W. Brown (Eds.), Policy implementation: Penalties or incentives? (pp. 43-67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bardach, E. (1989). Social regulation as a generic policy instrument. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), Beyond privatization: The tools of government action (pp. 197-223). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
6. Bardach, E., & Kagan, R. A. (1982). Going by the book: The problem of regulatory unreasonableness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
7. Barren, S., & Fudge, C. (Eds). (1981). Policy and action. London: Methuen.
8. Bayliss, L. E. (1966). Living control systems. London: English Universities Press.
9. Beavis, S. (1993, November 12). Eggar admits nuclear levy is anti-coal. Guardian, p. 16.
10. Beer, S. (1980). Preface. In H. R. Maturana & F. J. Varela, Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living (pp. 63-72). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.
11. Bercusson, B. (1988). Economic policy: State and private ordering. In T. Daintith (Ed.), Law as an instrument of economic policy: Comparative and critical approaches (pp. 359-400). New York and Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
12. Berger, S. (Ed.). (1986). Organizing interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, corporatism, and the transformation of politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Bernstein, M. H. (1955). Regulating business by independent commission. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Breyer, S. (1982). Regulation and its reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Brigham, J., & Brown, D. W. (Eds.). (1980). Policy implementation: Penalties or incentives? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. Broekstra, G. (1991). Consistency, configuration, closure and change. In R. J. In't Veld, L. Schaap, C.J.A.M. Termeer, & M.J.W. van Twist (Eds.), Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering (pp. 113-124). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
17. Bruijn, J. A. de, & Heuvelhof, E. F. ten (1991). Policy instruments for steering autopoietic actors. In R. J. In't Veld, L. Schaap, C.J.A.M. Termeer, & M.J.W. van Twist (Eds.), Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering (pp. 161-170). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
18. Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
19. Coleman, J. S. (1974). Power and the structure of society. New York: Norton.
20. Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. New York: Free Press and Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
21. Crouch, C. (1990). United Kingdom: The rejection of compromise. In G. Baglioni & amp; C. Crouch (Eds.), European industrial relations: The challenge of flexibility (pp. 325-355). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
22. Daintith, T. (Ed.). (1988). Law as an instrument of economic policy: Comparative and critical approaches. New York and Berlin: de Gruyter.
23. DeAngelis, D. L., Post, W. M., & Travis, C. C. (1986). Positive feedback in natural systems. New York and Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
24. Deutsch, K. (1963). The nerves of government. New York: Free Press.
25. Douglas, M. (1982). In the active voice. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
26. Dunleavy, P. (1991). Democracy, bureaucracy and public choice. London and New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
27. Dunsire, A. (1990). Holistic governance. Public Policy and Administration, 5, 3-18.
28. Dunsire, A. (1993a). Modes of governance. In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance: New government-society interactions (pp. 21-34). Newbury Park, Sage.
29. Dunsire, A. (1993b). Manipulating social tensions: Calibration as an alternative mode of government intervention (MPIFG Discussion Paper No. 93/7). Cologne, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
30. Dyson, K. (Ed.). (1992). The politics of regulation in Germany. London: Dartmouth.
31. Edelman, M. (1967). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
32. Edelman, M. (1971). Politics as symbolic action. Chicago: Markham.
33. Espejo, R., & Harnden, R. J. (Eds.). (1989). The viable system model. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
34. Fromm, E. (1942). The fear of freedom. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
35. Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state. London: Hamish Hamilton.
36. Galliher, J. F., & DeGregory, J. L. (1985). Violence in Northern Ireland: Understanding protestant perspectives. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.
37. Gleick, J. (1988). Chaos: Making a new science. London: Sphere.
38. Goodin, R. E. (1980). Manipulatory politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39. Green, T. H. (1895). Principles of political obligation. White Plains, NY: Longman.
40. Gretschmann, K. (1986). Measuring the public sector: A contestable issue. In F-X. Kaufmann, G. Majone, & V. Ostrom, (Eds.), Guidance, control and evaluation in the public sector (pp. 139-158). New York and Berlin: de Gruyter.
41. Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns [Theory of communicative action]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
42. Hanf, K., & Scharpf, F. W. (Eds.). (1978). Interorganizational policy making. Beverly Hills, CA, and London: Sage.
43. Hayek, F. A. von. (1944). The road to serfdom. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
44. Hood, C. C. (1983). The tools of government. New York and London: Macmillan.
45. Horowitz, D. L. (1977). The courts and social policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
46. Ingraham, P. W., & Kettl, D. F. (Eds.). (1992). Agenda for excellence: Public service in America. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
47. In't Veld, R. J., Schaap, L., Termeer, C.J.A.M., & Twist, M.J.W. van (Eds.). (1991). Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
48. Jantsch, E. (1981). Autopoiesis: A central aspect of dissipative self-organization. In M. Zeleny (Ed.), Autopoiesis: A theory of living organization (pp. 65-88). New York: North Holland.
49. Jessop, B. (1992). The economy, the state and the law: Theories of relative autonomy and autopoietic closure. In G. Teubner & A. Febbrajo (Eds.), State, law and economy as autopoietic systems: Regulation and autonomy in a new perspective (European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law 1991-1992, pp. 187-263). Milan: Dott. A Giuffré Editore.
50. Jones, R. W. (1973). Principles of biological regulation: An introduction to feedback systems. New York and London: Academic Press.
51. Keeling, D. (1972). Management in government. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
52. Kickert, W.J.M. (1991). Applicability of autopoiesis to administration science. In R. J. In't Veld, L. Schaap, C.J.A.M. Termeer, & M.J.W. van Twist (Eds.), Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering (pp. 193-205). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
53. Koppen, I. J. (1991). Environmental mediation: An example of applied autopoiesis? In R. J. In't Veld, L. Schaap, C.J.A.M. Termeer, & M.J.W. van Twist (Eds.), Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering (pp. 143-150). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
54. Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The world revolution of our time. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55. Lasswell, H. D., & Fox, M. B. (1979). The signature of power: Buildings, communication and policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
56. Laszlo, E. (1986). Systems and societies: The basic cybernetics of social evolution. In F. Geyer & J. van der Zouwen (Eds.), Sociocybernetic paradoxes: Observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems (pp. 145-171). Beverly Hills: Sage.
57. Lehmbruch, G. (1991). The organization of society, administrative strategies, and policy networks. In R. Czada & A. Windhoff-Héritier (Eds.), Political choice: Institutions, rules and the limits of rationality (pp. 123-158). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag and Boulder, CO: Westview.
58. Lorenz, K. (1966). On aggression (M. Letzke, Trans.). London: Methuen.
59. Luhmann, N. (1966). Grundrechte als Institution [Basic law as institution]. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
60. Luhmann, N. (1981). Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat [Political theory in the welfare state]. München: Olzog.
61. Luhmann, N. (1982). The differentiation of society. New York: Columbia University Press.
62. Luhmann, N. (1985). Soziale Systeme: Grundriβe einer algemeinen Theorie [Social systems: Blueprint of a general theory]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
63. Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In F. Geyer & J. van der Zouwen (Eds.), Sociocybernetic paradoxes: Observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems (pp. 172-192). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
64. Luhmann, N. (1988). Closure and openness: On reality in the world of law. In G. Teubner (Ed.), Autopoietic law (pp. 335-350). Berlin: de Gruyter.
65. Marin, B., & Mayntz, R. (Eds.). (1991). Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.
66. Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R.A.W. (Eds.). (1991). Policy networks in British government. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
67. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.
68. Mayntz, R. (1979). Regulative Politik in der Krise? [Regulatory policy in a crisis?] In J. Matthes (Ed.), Sozialer Wandel in Westeuropa. Verhandlungen des 19. Deutschen Soziologentags in Berlin 1979 (pp. 55-81). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.
69. Mayntz, R. (1980). Die Entwicklung des analytischen Paradigmas der Implementationsforschung [The development of analytical paradigms of implementation research]. In R. Mayntz (Ed.), Implementation politischer Programme I (pp. 1-19). Königstein/Ts, Germany: Anton Hain.
70. Mayntz, R. (1983a). The conditions of effective public policy: A new challenge for policy analysis. Policy and Politics, 11, 123-143.
71. Mayntz, R. (1983b). Implementation von regulativer Politik [Implementation of regulatory policy]. In R. Mayntz (Ed.), Implementation politischer Programme II: Ansätze zur Theoriebildung (pp. 50-74). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
72. Mayntz, R. (1993). Governing failures and the problem of governability: Some comments on a theoretical paradigm. In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance: New government-society interactions (pp. 9-20). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73. Mazmanian, D., & Sabatier, P. (Eds.). (1981). Effective policy implementation. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
74. Mingers, J. (1989). An introduction to autopoiesis - implications and applications. Systems Practice, 2, 159-180.
75. Mitnick, B. M. (1980). The political economy of regulation: Creating, designing and removing regulatory forms. New York: Columbia University Press.
76. Mohl, R. (1862). Staatsrecht, Völkerrecht und Politik [Constitutional law, international law, and politics]. Tübingen, Germany: Laupp.
77. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills: Sage.
78. Noback, C. R., & Demarest, R. J. (1982). The human nervous system: Basic principles of neurobiology (3rd ed.). New York and Tokyo: McGraw-Hill. (Original work published in 1967)
79. Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (1978). Law and society in transition. New York: Harper & Row.
80. Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The political business cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42, 169-190.
81. Offe, C. (1986). The attribution of public status to interest groups: Observations on the West German case. In S. Berger (Ed.), Organizing interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, corporatism, and the transformation of politics (pp. 123-158). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
83. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
84. Ostrom, V. (1974). The intellectual crisis in American public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
85. Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
86. Rehn, G., & Viklund, B. (1990). Changes in the Swedish model. In G. Baglioni & C. Crouch (Eds.), European industrial relations: The challenge of flexibility (pp. 300-325). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
87. Richardson, J. J. (Ed.). (1982). Policy styles in Western Europe. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
88. Rosenbloom, D. H. (1986). Understanding management, politics and law in the public sector. New York: Random House.
89. Ross, E. A. (1920). The principles of sociology. New York: Century.
90. Salamon, L. M. (1981). Rethinking public management: Third-party government and the changing forms of government action. Public Policy, 29, 256.
91. Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (1989). Beyond privatization: The tools of government action. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
92. Savas, E. S. (Ed.). (1977). Alternatives of delivering public services. Boulder, CO: Westview.
93. Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Interest intermediation and regime governability in contemporary Western Europe and North America. In S. Berger (Ed.), Organizing interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, corporatism, and the transformation of politics (pp. 285-305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
94. Schultze, C. L. (1977). The public use of private interest. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
95. Schwartz, M., & Thompson, M. (1990). Divided we stand: Redefining politics, technology, and social choice. New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
96. Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict (K. H. Wolff, Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published in 1908)
97. Simon, H. A., Smithburg, D. W., & Thompson, V. A. (1950). Public administration. New York: Knopf.
98. Spinoza, B. de. (1958). Tractatus politicus. In A. G. Wenham (Ed. and Trans.), The political works. Oxford: Clarendon. (Original work published in 1677)
99. Stebut, D. von. (1988). Subsidies as an instrument of economic policy. In T. Daintith (Ed.), Law as an instrument of economic policy: Comparative and critical approaches (pp. 137-152). New York and Berlin: de Gruyter.
100. Stewart, R. B. (1988). Regulation and the crisis of legalisation in the United States. In T. Daintith (Ed.), Law as an instrument of economic policy: Comparative and critical approaches (pp. 97-136). New York and Berlin: de Gruyter.
101. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2, 3-21.
102. Stigler, G. J. (1975). The citizen and the state: Essays on regulation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
103. Stone, D. (1975). Where the law ends: The social control of corporate behavior. New York: Harper & Row.
104. Streeck, W. (1984). Co-determination: The fourth decade. In B. Wilpert & A. Sorge (Eds.), International perspectives on organizational democracy (pp. 391-422). New York: John Wiley.
105. Teubner, G. (1986). After legal instrumentalism? Strategic models of post-regulatory Law. In G. Teubner (Ed.), Dilemmas of law in the welfare state (pp. 299-325). New York and Berlin: de Gruyter.
106. Teubner, G. (1987). Juridification of social spheres. Berlin: de Gruyter.
107. Teubner, G. (Ed.). (1988). Autopoietic law: A new approach to law and society. New York and Berlin: de Gruyter.
108. Teubner, G. (1989). Recht als autopoietisches System [Law as autopoietic system]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
109. Teubner, G. (1992). Social order from legislative noise? Autopoietic closure as a problem for legal regulation. In G. Teubner & A. Febbrajo (Eds.), State, law and economy as autopoietic systems: Regulation and autonomy in a new perspective (European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law 1991-1992, pp. 609-649). Milan: Dott. A. Giuffré Editore.
110. Teubner, G., & Febbrajo, A. (Eds.). (1992). State, law and economy as autopoietic systems: Regulation and autonomy in a new perspective (European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law 1991-1992). Milan: Dott. A Giuffré Editore.
111. Teubner, G., & Willke, H. (1984). Kontext und Autonomie: Gesellschaftliche Selbststeuerung durch reflexives Recht [Context and autonomy: Social self-government through reflexive law]. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 5, 4-35.
112. Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Boulder, CO: Westview.
113. Toates, F. M. (1975). Control theory in biology and experimental psychology. London: Hutchinson Educational.
114. Trubek, D. (Ed.). (1983). Reflexive law and the regulatory crisis. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
115. van Twist, M.J.W., & Schaap, L. (1991). Introduction to autopoiesis theory and autopoietic steering. In R. J. In't Veld, L. Schaap, C.J.A.M. Termeer, & M.J.W. van Twist (Eds.), Autopoiesis and configuration theory: New approaches to societal steering (pp. 31 -44). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
116. Van Horn, C. (1979). Policy implementation in the federal system. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
117. Voigt, R. (Ed.). (1980). Verrechtlichung: Analysen zu Funktion und Wirkung von Parlamentarisierung, Bürokratisierung und Justizialisierung sozialer, politischer und ökonomischer Prozesse [Juridification: Analyses on the function and working of the parliamentsrizing, bureacratizing, and justicializing of social, political, and economic processes]. Königstein/Ts, Germany: Athenaeum.
118. Voigt, R. (Ed.). (1983). Abschied vom Recht? [Exit from the law?] Frankfurt a.M., Germany: Suhrkamp.
119. Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. (Original work published in 1922)
120. Weidenbaum, M. L. (1969). The modern public sector; new ways of doing the government's business. New York: Basic Books.
121. Wight, M., Bull, H., & Holbraad, C. (Eds.). (1979). Power Politics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
122. Willke, H. (1982). Gesellschaftliche Kriterien ökonomischer Rationalität [Social criteria of economic rationality]. Unpublished manuscript, University of Cologne, Germany.
123. Willke, H. (1983). Entzauberung des Staates. Überlegungen zu einer sozietalen Steuerungstheorie [Breaking the state's spell: Considerations on a societal control theory]. Königstein, Germany: Athenäum Verlag.
124. Zeleny, M. (Ed.). (1981). Autopoiesis: A theory of living organization. New York: North Holland.
125. Zifcak, S. (1994). New managerialism: Administrative reform in Whitehall and Canberra. Buckingham, UK, and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
126. Zolo, D. (1992). The epistemological status of the theory of autopoiesis and its applications to the social sciences. In G. Teubner & A. Febbrajo (Eds.), State, law and economy as autopoietic systems: Regulation and autonomy in a new perspective (European Yearbook in the Sociology of Law 1991-1992, pp. 67-124). Milan: Dott. A. Giuffré Editore.