Are we going into town? Differential construal and group-based expectations mediating popularity ratings

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 839-844

  Bosveld, Willem ^a   Koomen, Willem ^b   Van Woerden, Cathelijne W ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030485836     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199609)26:5<839::AID-EJSP772>3.0.CO;2-I     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bosveld, W., Koomen, W., Van der Pligt, J., & Plaisier, J. W. (1995). Differential construal as an explanation for False Consensus and False Uniqueness Effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, in press.
2. Bosveld, W., Koomen, W., & Van der Pligt, J. (1995). Estimating group size: Effects of category membership, differential construal and selective exposure. European Journal of Social Psychology, in press.
3. Gilovich, T. (1981). Seeing the past in the present: The effect of associations to familiar events on judgements and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 797-808.
4. Gilovich, T. (1990). Differential construal and the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 623-634.
5. Griffin, D. W., & Ross, L. (1991). Subjective construal, social inference, and human misunderstanding. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 24, pp. 319-359). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Kunda, Z., & Sherman-Williams, B. (1993). Stereotypes and the construal of individuating information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 90-99.
7. Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 215-221.
8. Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1990). Consensus estimation in social context. In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds), European review of social psychology. Chichester: Wiley.
9. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
10. Van Woerden, C. W. (1994). Bouquetromans en Studio Sport: De invloed van onderwerp en eigen positie op consensus schattingen en op de interpretatie van een ambigu onderwerp. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam.