Sensitivity of a salmon population model to alternative formulations and initial conditions

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 88, Issue 1-3, 1996, Pages 215-226

  Bartholow, John M ^a,b  

^a US National Biological Service   (United States)

^b National Ecology Research Center

Author keywords

Fisheries; Population dynamics; Salmon; Sensitivity analysis; Spatial patterns; Water dynamics

Indexed keywords

FISHERY; POPULATION MODEL;

USA, CALIFORNIA, TRINITY RIVER;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 0030484693     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3800(95)00108-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bartholow, J.M. and Waddle, T.J., 1994. A salmon population model for evaluating alternative flow regimes. In: D.G Fontane and H.N. Tuvel (Editors), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference, Water Resources Planning and Management Division, ASCE, 23-26 May 1994, Denver, CO, pp. 877-889.
2. Bartholow, J.M., Laake, J.L., Stalnaker, C.B. and Williamson, S.C., 1993. A salmonid population model with emphasis on habitat limitations. Rivers, 4: 265-279.
3. Bovee, K.D., 1982. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper 12, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, FWS/OBS-82/26, 248 pp.
4. Bovee, K.D., 1988. Use of the instream flow incremental methodology to evaluate influences of microhabitat variability on trout populations in four Colorado streams. Proceedings of the Western Division of the American Fisheries Society, Albuquerque, NM, 31 pp.
5. Brandt, S.B., Mason, D.M. and Patrick, E.V., 1992. Spatially-explicit models of fish growth rate. Fisheries, 17: 23-35, and front cover.
6. Frankoski, L., 1994. The effects of spatial resolution in modeling the North Fork drainage of the Gunnison River basin. In: D.G Fontane and H.N. Tuvel (Editors), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference, Water Resources Planning and Management Division, ASCE, 23-26 May 1994, Denver, CO, pp. 29-32.
7. Grant, J.W.A. and Kramer, D.L., 1990. Territory size as a predictor of the upper limit to population density of juvenile salmonids in streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 47: 1724-1737.
8. Hay, D.W., 1986. Salmon studies in the Girnock Burn. Scot. Fish. Bull., 49: 17-21.
9. Houston, M., DeAngelis, D. and Post, W., 1988. New computer models unify ecological theory. BioScience, 38: 682-691.
10. Keenleyside, M.H.A. and Dupuis, H.M.C., 1988. Comparison of digging behavior by female pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) before and after spawning. Copeia, 4: 1092-1095.
11. McNeil, W.J., 1964. Redd superimposition and egg capacity of pink salmon spawning beds. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 21: 1385-1396.
12. McNeil, W.J., 1967. Randomness in the distribution of pink salmon redds. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 24: 1629-1634.
13. Milhous, R.T., Updike, M.A. and Schneider, D.M., 1989. Physical habitat simulation system reference manual-version II. Instream Flow Information Paper No. 26, U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Biol. Rep. 89(16), v.p.
14. Morhardt, J.E., Hanson, D.F. and Coulston, P.J., 1983. Instream flow: Increased accuracy using habitat mapping. In: Waterpower '83, Vol. 3. Environmental Impacts. An International Conference on Hydropower, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, TN, pp. 1294-1304.
15. Nehlsen, W., Williams, J.E. and Lichatowich, J.A., 1991. Pacific salmon at the crossroads: Stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries, 16: 4-21.
16. Nehring, R.B. and Anderson, R.M., 1993. Determination of population-limiting critical salmonid habitats in Colorado streams using the Physical Habitat Simulation System. Rivers, 4: 1-19.
17. Neilson, J.D. and Banford, C.E., 1983. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) spawner characteristics in relation to redd physical features. Can. J. Zool., 61: 1524-1531.
18. Orians, G.H. and Wittenberger, J.F., 1991. Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection. Am. Nat., 137 (Suppl.): S29-S49.
19. Parenskiy, V.A., 1990. Relation between the spawning success of sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka, and behavior on spawning grounds. J. Ichthyol., 30: 48-58. (Originally published in Voprosy Ikhtiologii (1989), 29: 985-993.)
20. Parenskiy, V.A., 1990. Relation between the spawning success of sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka, and behavior on spawning grounds. J. Ichthyol., 30: 48-58. (Originally published in Voprosy Ikhtiologii (1989), 29: 985-993.)
21. Semenchenko, N.N., 1988. Mechanisms of innate population control in sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. J. Ichthyol., 28: 149-157. (Originally published in Voprosy Ikhtiologii (1988), 1: 44-52.)
22. Semenchenko, N.N., 1988. Mechanisms of innate population control in sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. J. Ichthyol., 28: 149-157. (Originally published in Voprosy Ikhtiologii (1988), 1: 44-52.)
23. Waddle, T. and Sandelin, J., 1994. Managing reservoir storage for fish production. In: D.G Fontane and H.N. Tuvel (Editors), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference, Water Resources Planning and Management Division, ASCE, 23-26 May 1994, Denver, CO, pp. 49-52.
24. Wiens, J.A., 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct. Ecol., 3: 385-397.
25. Williamson, S.C., Bartholow, J.M. and Stalnaker, C.B., 1993. Conceptual model for quantifying pre-smolt production from flow-dependent physical habitat and water temperature. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 8: 15-28.