Modelling the effects of spatial variability in rainfall on catchment response. 2. Experiments with distributed and lumped models

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 175, Issue 1-4, 1996, Pages 89-111

  Shah, S M S ^a   O'Connell, P E ^b   Hosking, J R M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY   (Pakistan)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c IBM RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENT RESPONSE; RAINFALL MODEL;

EID: 0030483133     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80007-2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abbott, M.B., Bathurst, J.C., Cunge, J.A., O'Connell, P.E. and Rasmussen, J., 1986a. An introduction to European Hydrological System - Système Hydrologigue Européen 'SHE', I : History and philosophy of a physically-based distributed modelling system. J. Hydrol., 87: 45-59.
2. Abbott, M.B., Bathurst, J.C., Cunge, J.A., O'Connell, P.E. and Rasmussen, J., 1986b. An introduction to European Hydrological System - Système Hydrologique Européen 'SHE', 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system. J. Hydrol., 87: 61-77.
3. Amorocho, J., 1982. Stochastic modelling of rainfall in time and space. In: V.P. Singh (Editor), Statistical Analysis of Rainfall. Proc. Int. Symp. on Rainfall Runoff Modelling, Mississipi, 18-21 May 1981. Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 3-20.
4. Bathurst, J.C., 1986a. Physically-based distributed modelling of an upland catchment using the Système Hydrologique Européen. J. Hydrol., 87: 79-102.
5. Bathurst, J.C., 1986b. Sensitivity analysis of Système Hydrologique Européen for an upland catchment. J. Hydrol., 87: 103-123.
6. Bathurst, J.C. and Cooley, K.R., 1996. Use of the SHE hydrological modelling system to investigate basin response to snowmelt at Reynolds Creek, Idaho. J. Hydrol., 175: 181-211.
7. Beven, K. and Hornberger, G.H., 1982. Assessing the effect of spatial pattern of precipitation in modelling streamflow hydrographs. Water Resour. Bull., 18(5): 823-829.
8. Bowles, D.R. and O'Connell, P.E. (Editors), 1991. Recent Advances in the Modelling of Hydrologic Systems, Proc. NATO Advanced Study Institute, Sintra, Portugal, 10-23 July 1988. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
9. Box, G.E.P. and Jenkins, G.M., 1970. Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. Holden Day, San Francisco, CA.
10. Dawdy, D.R. and Bergman, J.M., 1969. Effect of rainfall variability on streamflow simulation. Water Resour. Res., 5: 958-966.
11. Hamlin, M.J., 1983. The significance of rainfall in the study of hydrological processes at basin scale. J. Hydrol., 65: 73-94.
12. Klemes, V., 1983. Conceptualisation and scale in hydrology. J. Hydrol., 65: 1-24.
13. Mellor, D., 1996. The Modified Turning Bands (MTB) model for space-time rainfall. I. Model definition and properties. J. Hydrol., 175: 113-127.
14. Milly, P.C.D. and Eagleson, P.S., 1982. Infiltration and evaporation at inhomogeneous land surfaces. Tech. Rep. 278, Ralph M. Parsons Lab., Dept. of Civil Eng., Mass. Inst. of Tech., Cambridge, MA.
15. Milly, P.C.D. and Eagleson, P.S., 1988. Effect of storm scale on surface runoff volume. Water Resour. Res., 24(4): 620-624.
16. Moore, R.J., 1980. Real-time forecasting of flood events using Transfer Function Noise (TFN) models: Part 2. Report, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
17. Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. 1: A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol., 10: 282-290.
18. Newson, M.D. and Harrison, J.G., 1978. Channel studies in the Plynlimon experimental catchments. Rep. 47, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, UK, 61 pp.
19. Nicks, A.D., 1982. Space-time quantification of rainfall inputs for hydrological transport models. J. Hydrol., 59: 249-260.
20. Obled, Ch., Wendling, J. and Beven, K., 1994. The sensitivity of hydrological models to spatial rainfall patterns: an evaluation using observed data. J. Hydrol., 159: 305-333.
21. Shah, S.M.S., O'Connell, P.E. and Hosking, J.R.M., 1996. Modelling the effects of spatial variability in rainfall on catchment response. I. Formulation and calibration of a stochastic rainfall field model. J. Hydrol., 175: 67-88.
22. Sivapalan, M., Beven, K.J. and Wood, E.F., 1987. On hydrological similarity: II. A scaled model of storm runoff production. Water Resour. Res., 23(12): 2266-2278.
23. Todini, E., 1996. The ARNO rainfall-runoff model. J. Hydrol., 175: 339-382.
24. Todini, E. and Wallis, J., 1977. Using CLS for daily or longer period rainfall-runoff modelling. In: T.A. Ciriani, U. Maione and J.R. Wallis (Editors), Mathematical Models for Surface Water Hydrology. Wiley, London, pp. 149-168.
25. Wilson, C.B., Valdes, J.B. and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., 1979. On the influence of the spatial distribution of rainfall on storm runoff. Water Resour. Res., 15: 321-328.
26. Wood, E.F., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K. and Band, L., 1988. Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrological modelling. J. Hydrol., 102: 29-47.
27. Young, P.C., 1986. Time-series methods and recursive estimation in hydrological systems analysis. In: D.A. Kraijenhoff and J.R. Moll (Editors), River Flow Modelling and Forecasting. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 129-180.
28. Young, P.C., Shellswell, S.H. and Neethling, C.G., 1971. A recursive approach to time-series analysis. CUED/B-Control/TRK, Dept. of Eng., University of Cambridge.